rewrite-chapter
Skill0 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Revise an existing chapter draft using its review feedback, style bible, chapter plan, and continuity constraints when the chapter needs a real rewrite instead of a fresh draft or a high-level plan.
In this repository27 other files it gives its agents.
- beta-reader-passSkill
- build-distributionSkill
- chapter-reviewSkill
- continuity-checkSkill
- create-character-bibleSkill
- define-style-bibleSkill
- draft-chapterSkill
- generate-high-level-outlineSkill
- if-design-dialogueSkill
- if-design-mapSkill
- if-design-progressionSkill
- if-design-structureSkill
- if-draft-inkSkill
- if-init-projectSkill
- if-load-contextSkill
- if-plan-ink-sliceSkill
- if-playtest-reviewSkill
- if-sync-stateSkill
- ink-docSkill
- init-story-projectSkill
- load-story-contextSkill
- manuscript-reviewSkill
- plan-chapterSkill
- prepare-exportSkill
- sync-story-bibleSkill
- update-character-stateSkill
- update-timelineSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
21 rules. About 0 are common, 17 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈17
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Use this skill to rewrite a drafted chapter after editorial feedback.
- Distinctive: line 14
Use this skill when:
- Very specific: line 21
Do not use this skill to create a first draft from scratch.
- Distinctive: line 35
Ask questions only when the target chapter or review scope is genuinely unclear.
- Distinctive: line 48
Read these when present and relevant:
- Very specific: line 71
Read story.language before rewriting.
- Distinctive: line 72
Keep file and folder names in English.
- Distinctive: line 73
Write the chapter body and revision note in the selected story language.
- Distinctive: line 74
Use correct orthography, accents, and normal Unicode for that language.
- Very specific: line 75
If story.language is missing, gather it before writing.
- Very specific: line 76
If the target files use a different language than story.language, flag the mismatch and resolve it deliberately.
- Distinctive: line 80
Read the current chapter and its review completely before rewriting.
- Distinctive: line 85
Read the minimum surrounding context needed to preserve continuity and chapter-to-chapter flow.
- Distinctive: line 88
If a review point would require changing the story beyond the chapter's remit, defer it explicitly instead of improvising a larger fix.
- Distinctive: line 89
Write a revision artifact that records what changed.
- Distinctive: line 118
no hidden structural rewrite happened without being documented.
- Distinctive: line 123
After running the skill, provide:
- Distinctive: line 142
Do not place editorial notes inside the chapter body.
- Distinctive: line 143
Do not turn a chapter rewrite into a full-book rewrite.
- Distinctive: line 144
Do not resolve review comments by inventing canon-breaking shortcuts.
- Distinctive: line 145
Do not discard the existing draft's useful material without reason.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Rewrite Chapter
Overview
Use this skill to rewrite a drafted chapter after editorial feedback. It should produce a stronger chapter draft while leaving a separate revision artifact that explains which review findings were applied, deferred, or left unresolved.
When To Use
Use this skill when:
- a chapter draft already exists;
- a chapter review identifies issues that require rewriting rather than minor line edits;
- the chapter needs to absorb feedback without re-planning the whole manuscript;
- the user wants a revised chapter plus a traceable record of changes.
Do not use this skill to create a first draft from scratch. Use draft-chapter for that.
Required Inputs
Gather or infer these inputs:
story.yamlmetadata;- target chapter number;
- existing chapter draft;
- chapter review;
- chapter plan or outline context;
- style and continuity constraints;
- adjacent chapter context only when needed for transitions.
Ask questions only when the target chapter or review scope is genuinely unclear.
Files To Read
Always read:
story.yaml05_draft/chapter_XX.md06_review/chapter_XX.review.md01_style/voice.md01_style/prose_rules.md01_style/pov.md
Read these when present and relevant:
01_style/taboo_list.md01_style/lexical_notes.md04_outline/chapter_XX.plan.md02_story/chapter_list.md- relevant files under
03_characters/ - adjacent chapters in
05_draft/ 07_continuity/*
Files To Write
Write or update:
05_draft/chapter_XX.md06_review/chapter_XX.revision.md
The revision note must remain separate from the chapter body.
Language Rules
This skill depends on story.yaml as the source of truth for project metadata.
- Read
story.languagebefore rewriting. - Keep file and folder names in English.
- Write the chapter body and revision note in the selected story language.
- Use correct orthography, accents, and normal Unicode for that language.
- If
story.languageis missing, gather it before writing. - If the target files use a different language than
story.language, flag the mismatch and resolve it deliberately.
Procedure
- Read the current chapter and its review completely before rewriting.
- Classify the review findings into:
- must apply now;
- can defer safely;
- conflicts with canon, outline, or other accepted constraints.
- Read the minimum surrounding context needed to preserve continuity and chapter-to-chapter flow.
- Rewrite the chapter so that the accepted feedback is reflected in the narrative itself, not in commentary.
- Preserve the project voice, POV, tense, and canon boundaries.
- If a review point would require changing the story beyond the chapter's remit, defer it explicitly instead of improvising a larger fix.
- Write a revision artifact that records what changed.
Output Requirements
Revised Chapter
05_draft/chapter_XX.md should contain only:
- chapter heading or identifier consistent with project convention;
- the revised narrative text;
- optional minimal metadata only if already used by the project.
Revision Artifact
06_review/chapter_XX.revision.md should include:
- short summary of the revision pass;
- review findings applied;
- findings deferred;
- findings rejected due to conflict with canon or structure;
- continuity or structural risks that remain;
- recommended next skill.
Quality Bar
The revised chapter should make it clear that:
- the key review issues were addressed inside the prose;
- the chapter remains aligned with style and continuity;
- no hidden structural rewrite happened without being documented;
- another agent can continue from the new state without ambiguity.
Output
After running the skill, provide:
- a short summary of the rewrite;
- the most important changes applied;
- any findings explicitly deferred;
- the recommended next step, usually
continuity-checkorupdate-character-state.
Definition Of Done
This skill is done when:
- the chapter draft has been revised;
- a separate revision note exists;
- the rewrite respects
story.language; - the rewritten chapter is cleaner without breaking canon or outline;
- deferred issues are explicit rather than silently ignored.
Restrictions
- Do not place editorial notes inside the chapter body.
- Do not turn a chapter rewrite into a full-book rewrite.
- Do not resolve review comments by inventing canon-breaking shortcuts.
- Do not discard the existing draft's useful material without reason.
Example Invocation
Use $rewrite-chapter to revise chapter 2 from its review feedback, preserving the current tone and continuity while tightening the scene logic.Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

