node-connect
Skill57 starsChanged 4 days agoMITView on GitHub
Diagnose OpenClaw Control UI browser and native Android, iOS, or macOS node connection failures across route, auth, pairing, QR/setup-code, and reconnect states.
17 other projects use a version of this, 3 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- QVerisAI/QVerisBottheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- OpenClawAndroid/openclaw-android-assistantedited, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- molt-bot/clawdbotedited, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- steipete/warelayword for word, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- friuns2/openclaw-android-assistantedited, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- moltbot/clawdbotword for word, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use taskflow-inbox-triage.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AtomicBot-aiSkilltaskflow-inbox-triage
Also in 6 projects that use this
Other versions17 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 6
- moltbot/clawdbot★ 394k100% same
- steipete/warelay★ 394k100% same
- steipete/clawdis★ 394k100% same
- moltbot/moltbot★ 394k100% same
- clawdbot/clawdbot★ 394k100% same
- openclaw/openclaw★ 394k100% same
Edited · 3
- molt-bot/clawdbot★ 391k97% same
- friuns2/openclaw-android-assistant★ 57397% same
- OpenClawAndroid/openclaw-android-assistant★ 55697% same
Wrote their own version · 8
- spinabot/brigade★ 11ksame name
- the-open-agent/openagent★ 5.7ksame name
- casibase/casibase★ 5.7ksame name
- OpenBMB/EdgeClaw★ 1.2ksame name
- AtomicBot-ai/atomicbot★ 325same name
- QVerisAI/QVerisBot★ 184same name
- hkyutong/OneClaw★ 1same name
- OpenGitCode/OpenShell★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository109 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- extensions/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- scripts/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- test/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ui/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-transcriptSkill
- auto-qaSkill
- autoreviewSkill
- channel-message-flowsSkill
- clawdtributorSkill
- claw-scoreSkill
- clawsweeperSkill
- control-ui-e2eSkill
- crabboxSkill
- discord-clawdSkill
- discord-e2eSkill
- discord-user-postSkill
- discrawlSkill
- gitcrawlSkill
- graincrawlSkill
- notcrawlSkill
- openclaw-changelog-updateSkill
- openclaw-ci-limitsSkill
- openclaw-debuggingSkill
- openclaw-docker-e2e-authoringSkill
- openclaw-ghsa-maintainerSkill
- openclaw-live-updaterSkill
- openclaw-parallels-smokeSkill
- openclaw-performanceSkill
- openclaw-pr-maintainerSkill
- openclaw-qa-testingSkill
- openclaw-refactor-docsSkill
- openclaw-release-validationSkill
- openclaw-repair-sweepSkill
- openclaw-secret-scanning-maintainerSkill
- openclaw-test-heap-leaksSkill
- openclaw-testingSkill
- openclaw-test-performanceSkill
- openclaw-updateSkill
- parallels-discord-roundtripSkill
- plugin-sdk-impactSkill
- proof-videoSkill
- prototype-openclaw-tuiSkill
- pr-simplifySkill
- release-openclaw-announcementSkill
- release-openclaw-ciSkill
- release-openclaw-macSkill
- release-openclaw-maintainerSkill
- release-openclaw-plugin-testingSkill
- security-triageSkill
- slack-e2eSkill
- slacrawlSkill
- solidSkill
- tag-duplicate-prs-issuesSkill
- technical-documentationSkill
- telegram-e2e-userbotSkill
- test-auditSkill
- update-team-serverSkill
- verify-releaseSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 11 edited versions we read keep these.
8
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Use the named deployment wrapper/profile for every config, log, service, device, and node command.
- Very specific: line 15
Never drift to a bare openclaw, proof environment, or similarly named deployment.
- Distinctive: line 16
If the global executable is stale, invoke the target through its owner.
- Distinctive: line 17
Verify status, config, logs, and process identity describe the same Gateway.
- Distinctive: line 32
Run these through the locked target:
- Distinctive: line 50
No matching Gateway attempt: route, DNS, TLS, origin, or proxy problem.
- Distinctive: line 62
When Tailscale is involved, inspect live state rather than inferring it from OpenClaw config:
- Very specific: line 82
If logs say pairing required, re-list devices and approve the exact request ID.
- Very specific: line 84
After a repeated 1006, preserve auth/pairing and inspect reconnect evidence.
- Very specific: line 98
If the app reports pairing required:
- Distinctive: line 111
Before approval, match available request, device/public-key, client, mode/role, platform, address, user, and retry-time facts.
- Distinctive: line 119
no immediate auth, pairing, or reconnect failure follows.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 11 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Node Connect
Goal: fix one exact client against one exact Gateway, then prove that client's fresh connection.
1. Lock the target
Record the target environment/profile, OpenClaw binary, config/state root, Gateway URL/port, and service before changing anything.
- Use the named deployment wrapper/profile for every config, log, service, device, and node command.
- Never drift to a bare
openclaw, proof environment, or similarly named deployment. - If the global executable is stale, invoke the target through its owner.
- Verify status, config, logs, and process identity describe the same Gateway.
Identify the target Gateway before changing pairing or auth.
2. Classify the client
Classify from the request and Gateway log before choosing commands:
- Control UI browser: the user says browser, dashboard, Control UI, or webchat; logs show
client=openclaw-control-uiormode=webchat. - Native mobile/node: the official app shows Connect, Scan QR, or setup code; logs/request metadata show a native client or
role=node.
A phone can be either client. Do not use openclaw qr or openclaw nodes status for a phone browser; those belong to native mobile/node pairing.
3. Observe the failing attempt
Run these through the locked target:
openclaw gateway status --deep
openclaw logs --follow --json
openclaw devices list
openclaw config get gateway.mode
openclaw config get gateway.bind
openclaw config get gateway.remote.url
openclaw config get gateway.auth.mode
openclaw config get gateway.auth.allowTailscale
openclaw config get gateway.tailscale.modeHave the client retry once while logs are live. Correlate its client ID, mode, platform, address, auth result, device ID, user, and close code. Ignore other paired devices.
Interpret the first failed transition:
- No matching Gateway attempt: route, DNS, TLS, origin, or proxy problem.
token_missing,password_missing, mismatch, or Tailscale identity failure: auth failed before pairing, so an empty pending list is expected.pairing required: route and auth succeeded; approve the exact pending request.client connected: matchconn,client,mode, androleto the exact client. Admission precedes the hello response; if followed by1006, preserve auth/pairing and inspect hello delivery, lifecycle, transport, proxy, or reconnect. Older builds use overlappingauthenticated user connected/webchat connectedrecords that omit ephemeral clients.1006without a matching application-level admission record does not prove auth/pairing; inspect the earlier handshake transition.
4. Prove the route
Choose one topology: same machine, LAN, tailnet, or public reverse proxy. Do not mix them.
- Browser Control UI needs HTTPS or localhost for browser device identity. A remote plain-HTTP Tailnet/LAN URL is not a valid substitute.
gateway.tailscale.mode=offmeans OpenClaw is not managing Serve/Funnel. It does not prove that Tailscale or an externally managed Serve route is absent.- When Tailscale is involved, inspect live state rather than inferring it from OpenClaw config:
tailscale status --json
tailscale serve status --jsonMatch the client's URL to the listener/proxy route reaching the locked Gateway.
5A. Control UI browser lane
Restore browser auth before looking for a pairing request:
- For token/password auth, enter the credential in Control UI settings. Never put permanent secrets in chat, logs, or URLs.
- Prefer
openclaw dashboardon the Gateway host for a one-time signed handoff. Use--no-openonly when the operator can retrieve that host's clipboard, and keep the host browser/clipboard outside agent tooling. Never capturedashboard --json: it can expose the handoff and shared credentials. Never relay, rewrite, or send a loopback handoff URL to a remote phone. - For Tailscale Serve, verify the live route and forwarded identity. Enable
gateway.auth.allowTailscaleonly for that intended trust boundary. Verified Tailscale Control UI auth with browser device identity can skip pairing.
After auth succeeds:
- Retry; never infer pairing from the pre-auth attempt. Token/password auth can reveal
pairing required; verified Tailscale identity can skip it. - If logs say
pairing required, re-list devices and approve the exact request ID. - A successful verified-Tailscale connection may correctly create no pending or paired-device row.
- After a repeated
1006, preserve auth/pairing and inspect reconnect evidence.
5B. Native mobile/node lane
Inspect the native route through the locked target without exposing the setup credential:
openclaw qr --json | jq '{gatewayUrl, gatewayUrls, auth, access, accessDowngraded, urlSource}'For a CLI controlling a remote Gateway, add --remote before --json; it selects gateway.remote.url and remote credentials. If the redaction filter is unavailable, do not run raw QR JSON in agent-visible output.
Verify gatewayUrl and urlSource. The setup code is password-equivalent: have the operator copy it from Control UI → Devices → Pair device, or run openclaw qr --setup-code-only in a terminal outside agent tooling and paste it directly into the official app. Never relay it through agent/chat/tool output. Generate a fresh code after a URL/auth fix or expiry.
If the app reports pairing required:
openclaw devices list
openclaw devices approve --latest # preview only; exits without approval
openclaw devices approve <requestId>
openclaw nodes status--latest only previews the current request; never treat it as approval. Re-list immediately before the exact-ID command because retries can supersede the request. Never approve by position, age, or similarity.
6. Correlate and finish
Before approval, match available request, device/public-key, client, mode/role, platform, address, user, and retry-time facts.
Declare success only after a new attempt made after the final change proves all applicable checks:
- the exact client reaches the locked Gateway;
- intended auth succeeds;
- the browser completes initial requests, or the native node appears in
openclaw nodes status; - approval used the exact request ID; and
- no immediate auth, pairing, or reconnect failure follows.
A QR/setup code, launched browser, empty pending list, approval, paired-device count, or Tailscale ping proves only one transition.
Report the diagnosis, chosen route/auth lane, exact-client evidence, and any remaining failed transition.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

