agentleFS
bighamxbighamx/openclaw-android-node-apk/.agents/skills/openclaw-test-performance/SKILL.md

openclaw-test-performance

Skill59 starsChanged 16 days agoMITView on GitHub

Benchmark, diagnose, and optimize OpenClaw test and plugin-suite runtime, import hotspots, CPU/RSS, heap growth, and slow coverage paths.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

23 rules. 15 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.

  • 15

    Common

    Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 8

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use evidence first. The goal is real pnpm test, plugin-suite, and plugin-inspector speed/RSS improvement with coverage intact, not runner …

    line 8
  2. Common:

    Read the relevant local AGENTS.md files before editing:

    line 14
  3. Common:

    If a full-suite grouped run reports a lane failure but JSON says tests passed, capture that as harness/noise and verify the suspect file …

    line 37
  4. Common:

    Prefer dependency injection, loaded-plugin-only lookup, explicit fixtures, and pure helpers over broad mocks.

    line 50
  5. Common:

    Keep schedulers/background loops off unless the test proves scheduling.

    line 53
  6. Common:

    Do not delete a slow integration proof unless the exact production composition is extracted into a named helper and tested.

    line 57
  7. Common:

    Keep one cheap integration smoke when cross-component wiring matters.

    line 59
  8. Common:

    Update the running report when requested or when this thread is tracking one.

    line 63
  9. Common:

    Use this section when perf work involves bundled plugins, plugin-inspector, SDK barrels, package-boundary tests, or extension suites.

    line 71
  10. Very specific:

    all bundled source tests: pnpm test:extensions

    line 78
  11. Common:

    Start narrow, then widen:

    line 82
  12. Common:

    Treat plugin-inspector failures as product signals:

    line 90
  13. Very specific:

    Follow $openclaw-testing for host selection.

    line 96
  14. Very specific:

    If plugin performance is package-artifact sensitive, switch to release-openclaw-plugin-testing and Package Acceptance rather than trusting …

    line 100
  15. Very specific:

    Use openclaw-test-heap-leaks when RSS keeps growing across intervals, workers OOM, or the suspect command has app-object retention.

    line 148
  16. Very specific:

    Test plugin registry seeded in beforeAll while runtime state resets in afterEach.

    line 167
  17. Common:

    Always run the targeted test surface that proves the change.

    line 228
  18. Very specific:

    Run pnpm build when touching lazy-loading, bundled artifacts, package boundaries, dynamic imports, build output, or public surfaces.

    line 231
  19. Very specific:

    If deps are missing/stale, run pnpm install and retry the exact failed command once.

    line 240
  20. Common:

    Use the report format:

    line 242
  21. Common:

    Keep the final concise:

    line 254
  22. Common:

    Before/after wall, Vitest/import, CPU, and RSS numbers where available.

    line 259
  23. Common:

    Commit hash and push status.

    line 265

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

OpenClaw Test Performance

Use evidence first. The goal is real pnpm test, plugin-suite, and plugin-inspector speed/RSS improvement with coverage intact, not runner tuning by guesswork.

Workflow

  1. Read the relevant local AGENTS.md files before editing:
    • src/agents/AGENTS.md for agent/import hotspots.
    • src/channels/AGENTS.md and src/plugins/AGENTS.md for plugin/channel laziness.
    • src/gateway/AGENTS.md for server lifecycle tests.
    • test/helpers/AGENTS.md and src/channels/plugins/contracts/test-helpers/AGENTS.md for shared contract helpers.
    • src/infra/outbound/AGENTS.md for outbound/media/action tests.
  2. Establish a baseline before changing code:
    • Prefer pnpm test:perf:groups --full-suite --allow-failures --output <file> for full-suite ranking.
    • For bundled plugin breadth, run the smallest relevant pnpm test:extensions:batch <plugin[,plugin...]> or plugin-inspector command before jumping to the full extension sweep.
    • For a scoped hotspot use: /usr/bin/time -l pnpm test <file-or-files> --maxWorkers=1 --reporter=verbose
    • For import-heavy suspicion add: OPENCLAW_VITEST_IMPORT_DURATIONS=1 OPENCLAW_VITEST_PRINT_IMPORT_BREAKDOWN=1.
  3. Separate wall/runner noise from real file cost:
    • Compare Vitest duration, test body timing, import breakdown, wall time, and max RSS.
    • Re-run single files when grouped/full-suite numbers look stale or noisy.
    • If a full-suite grouped run reports a lane failure but JSON says tests passed, capture that as harness/noise and verify the suspect file directly.
  4. Pick the next attack by return and risk:
    • High return: one file/test dominates seconds or RSS and has a clear root.
    • High leverage: one plugin or SDK barrel causes every plugin-inspector or extension-batch run to load broad runtime.
    • Lower risk: static descriptors, target parsing, routing, auth bypass, setup hints, registry fixtures, or test server lifecycle.
    • Higher risk: real memory/runtime behavior, live providers, protocol contracts, or broad production refactors.
  5. Fix the root cause, not the symptom:
    • Move static metadata/parsing into narrow helpers or lightweight artifacts reused by full runtime and fast paths.
    • Prefer dependency injection, loaded-plugin-only lookup, explicit fixtures, and pure helpers over broad mocks.
    • Reuse suite-level servers/clients when a fresh handshake is irrelevant.
    • Keep schedulers/background loops off unless the test proves scheduling.
    • In plugin paths, move static metadata into manifest/lightweight artifacts and keep runtime plugin loads behind explicit execution boundaries.
  6. Preserve coverage shape:
    • Do not delete a slow integration proof unless the exact production composition is extracted into a named helper and tested.
    • Keep one cheap integration smoke when cross-component wiring matters.
    • State explicitly what incidental coverage was removed, if any.
  7. Re-benchmark the same command after the change and compute seconds plus percent gain.
  8. Update the running report when requested or when this thread is tracking one. Include before/after commands, artifacts, coverage notes, verification, and next attack order.
  9. Stage the intended paths, commit with standard Git, and push when the user asked for commits/pushes. Stage only files touched for this attack.

Plugin-Suite Workflow

Use this section when perf work involves bundled plugins, plugin-inspector, SDK barrels, package-boundary tests, or extension suites.

  1. Map the suite shape first:
    • source tests: pnpm test extensions/<id> or pnpm test:extensions:batch <id>
    • package boundaries: pnpm run test:extensions:package-boundary:canary and pnpm run test:extensions:package-boundary:compile
    • all bundled source tests: pnpm test:extensions
    • plugin import memory: pnpm test:extensions:memory -- --json .artifacts/test-perf/extensions-memory.json
    • plugin-inspector/report work: keep report primitives in plugin-inspector; keep wrappers thin and collect peak RSS when the command supports it.
  2. Start narrow, then widen:
    • one plugin changed: run that plugin's tests and plugin-inspector slice.
    • SDK/public barrel changed: add representative provider, channel, memory, and feature plugins.
    • loader/runtime mirror changed: add package-boundary checks and build/package proof as needed.
    • unknown shared plugin behavior: run test:extensions:batch groups before pnpm test:extensions.
  3. Treat plugin-inspector failures as product signals:
    • JSON must parse.
    • warnings/errors must be classified, not hidden.
    • runtime capture should be quiet and config-tolerant.
    • command output should include wall time, exit code, and peak RSS when available.
  4. Follow $openclaw-testing for host selection. Trusted source benchmarks can run locally with comparable machine/load conditions. Use $crabbox when clean packaging, Linux/platform behavior, isolation, or an explicit remote request is part of the proof; reuse and clean up only the owned lease.
  5. If plugin performance is package-artifact sensitive, switch to release-openclaw-plugin-testing and Package Acceptance rather than trusting source-only timing.

Metric Collection

Collect at least one stable metric before and after. Prefer the same machine and same command. For Testbox comparisons, use the same tbx_... id when possible.

MetricUse forPreferred source
wall timeuser-visible suite cost/usr/bin/time -l, test wrapper duration, Testbox run time
Vitest durationtest body/import costVitest output per file/shard
import durationbroad barrel/runtime loadsOPENCLAW_VITEST_IMPORT_DURATIONS=1
max RSSmemory pressure and OOM risk/usr/bin/time -l, pnpm test:extensions:memory, wrapper memory summaries
CPU/user/sysCPU-bound vs wait-bound split/usr/bin/time -l locally, Testbox job timing when local CPU is noisy
heap evidencereal leak vs retained module graphopenclaw-test-heap-leaks workflow

Local scoped command with CPU/RSS:

timeout 240 /usr/bin/time -l pnpm test <file> --maxWorkers=1 --reporter=verbose

Plugin import memory profile:

pnpm build
pnpm test:extensions:memory -- --top 20 --json .artifacts/test-perf/extensions-memory.json

Targeted plugin import memory:

pnpm test:extensions:memory -- --extension discord --extension telegram --skip-combined

Heap/RSS escalation:

pnpm test:perf:groups \
  --config test/vitest/vitest.unit-fast.config.ts \
  --allow-failures \
  --output .artifacts/test-perf/unit-fast-memory.json
pnpm test:perf:profile:runner -- \
  --output-dir .artifacts/test-perf/vitest-runner-profile -- <file>

Use openclaw-test-heap-leaks when RSS keeps growing across intervals, workers OOM, or the suspect command has app-object retention. Do not call RSS growth a leak until snapshots or retainers support it.

Common Root Causes

  • Full bundled channel/plugin runtime loaded for static data.
  • getChannelPlugin() fallback used when an already-loaded fixture or pure parser would suffice.
  • Broad api.ts, runtime-api.ts, test-api.ts, or plugin-sdk barrels pulled into hot tests.
  • SDK root aliases or package barrels pulling focused subpaths back into a broad plugin graph.
  • Plugin-inspector loading runtime code just to render metadata, reports, or CI policy scores.
  • Bundled plugin capture reusing real config/home state instead of synthetic, redacted, isolated state.
  • Partial-real mocks using importActual() around broad modules.
  • vi.resetModules() plus fresh imports in per-test loops.
  • Test plugin registry seeded in beforeAll while runtime state resets in afterEach.
  • Per-test gateway/server/client startup when state reset would suffice.
  • Runtime/default model/auth selection paid by idle snapshots or fixtures.
  • Plugin-owned media/action discovery triggered before checking whether args contain plugin-owned fields.
  • Parallel Vitest runs sharing node_modules/.experimental-vitest-cache without distinct OPENCLAW_VITEST_FS_MODULE_CACHE_PATH values.

Benchmark Commands

Scoped file:

timeout 240 /usr/bin/time -l pnpm test <file> --maxWorkers=1 --reporter=verbose

Scoped file with import breakdown:

timeout 240 /usr/bin/time -l env \
  OPENCLAW_VITEST_IMPORT_DURATIONS=1 \
  OPENCLAW_VITEST_PRINT_IMPORT_BREAKDOWN=1 \
  pnpm test <file> --maxWorkers=1 --reporter=verbose

Grouped suite:

pnpm test:perf:groups --full-suite --allow-failures \
  --output .artifacts/test-perf/<name>.json

Extension batch:

pnpm test:extensions:batch <plugin[,plugin...]> -- --reporter=verbose

All extension tests:

pnpm test:extensions

Package-boundary plugin checks:

pnpm run test:extensions:package-boundary:canary
pnpm run test:extensions:package-boundary:compile

Reuse an existing Vitest JSON report:

pnpm test:perf:groups --report <vitest-json> \
  --output .artifacts/test-perf/<name>.json

Verification

  • Always run the targeted test surface that proves the change.
  • Source changes: focused local tests + targeted typecheck/lint/format before push; pnpm check:changed optional. PR CI = broad proof. Testbox only for CI/local gaps, immediate grant; warmed Testbox reuse when selected.
  • For test-only changes, run pnpm test:changed or the exact edited tests.
  • Run pnpm build when touching lazy-loading, bundled artifacts, package boundaries, dynamic imports, build output, or public surfaces.
  • For plugin SDK/barrel/runtime changes, compare exact commits with pnpm plugin-sdk:api:diff -- --base <base-sha> --head <head-sha> when the public API surface may drift. For PR-local proof, use the branch merge base as <base-sha> and the exact tested head commit as <head-sha>.
  • For plugin-suite perf fixes, verify at least one representative plugin batch plus the changed gate; use Package Acceptance if the bug only exists in a packed artifact.
  • If deps are missing/stale, run pnpm install and retry the exact failed command once.
  • Use the report format:
| Metric         | Before |  After |          Gain |
| -------------- | -----: | -----: | ------------: |
| File wall time |   `Xs` |   `Ys` |  `-Zs` (`P%`) |
| Max RSS        |  `XMB` |  `YMB` | `-ZMB` (`P%`) |
| CPU user/sys   | `X/Ys` | `A/Bs` |       explain |

Handoff

Keep the final concise:

  • Root cause.
  • Suite/plugin scope.
  • Files changed.
  • Before/after wall, Vitest/import, CPU, and RSS numbers where available.
  • Leak classification if memory was involved: real leak, retained module graph, or inconclusive.
  • Coverage retained.
  • Verification commands.
  • Testbox ID or workflow URL for remote proof.
  • Commit hash and push status.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.