openclaw-docker-e2e-authoring
Skill59 starsChanged 16 days agoMITView on GitHub
Author OpenClaw Docker E2E and live provider Docker lanes.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Use this when adding or changing Docker E2E lanes, release-path Docker tests, or live-provider Docker proof.
- Distinctive: line 17
Prefer both when they prove different risks: deterministic for byte/payload routing, live for actual provider behavior.
- Very specific: line 22
Test-only helpers live in test/helpers or scripts/e2e/lib/<lane>/, not src/, unless production imports them.
- Very specific: line 28
Add the package script and scripts/lib/docker-e2e-scenarios.mjs lane in the same change.
- Distinctive: line 30
If a lane installs a plugin from npm, default the spec via env so published and local override paths are both testable.
- Distinctive: line 36
Use neutral filenames, neutral prompts, and no metadata leaks.
- Very specific: line 45
Wait for completion with agent.wait.
- Distinctive: line 48
Keep originating channel/account metadata only when the bug path needs queued inbound/channel context.
- Distinctive: line 53
Run the smallest proof that covers the touched lane:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
OpenClaw Docker E2E Authoring
Use this when adding or changing Docker E2E lanes, release-path Docker tests, or live-provider Docker proof.
Lane Choice
- Deterministic Docker: fake the dependency/server and assert the exact runtime contract crossing the boundary.
- Live Docker: use real provider credentials/model only when user-visible behavior needs the real service.
- Prefer both when they prove different risks: deterministic for byte/payload routing, live for actual provider behavior.
Authoring Rules
- Test-only helpers live in
test/helpersorscripts/e2e/lib/<lane>/, notsrc/**, unless production imports them. - Package-installed app runs from
/app; mount only explicit harness/helper paths read-only. - Fake servers should log boundary requests as JSONL and clients should assert the real dependency payload, not just process success.
- Add the package script and
scripts/lib/docker-e2e-scenarios.mjslane in the same change. - If a lane installs a plugin from npm, default the spec via env so published and local override paths are both testable.
Media And Vision
- Expected answer must exist only in pixels or provider output being tested.
- Use neutral filenames, neutral prompts, and no metadata leaks.
- Random bitmap/OCR tokens reuse the repo OCR-safe alphabet
24567ACEFunless the test owns a stronger glyph set. - Make the expected answer unique per run when proving real image understanding.
chat.send E2E
- Require
chat.sendto returnstatus: "started"and a stringrunId. - Wait for completion with
agent.wait. - Assert final user-visible text via
chat.historywhen event ordering is not the behavior under test. - Keep originating channel/account metadata only when the bug path needs queued inbound/channel context.
Verification
Run the smallest proof that covers the touched lane:
pnpm exec oxfmt --write <changed files>
node --check <new .mjs files>
bash -n <new .sh files>
node scripts/run-vitest.mjs test/scripts/docker-e2e-plan.test.ts
OPENCLAW_SKIP_DOCKER_BUILD=1 pnpm test:docker:<lane>For real-provider lanes, run the matching live Docker script after deterministic
Docker is green. Finish with $autoreview before commit/PR.
Other versions11 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 11
- steipete/warelay★ 394k100% same
- moltbot/clawdbot★ 394k100% same
- moltbot/moltbot★ 394k100% same
- clawdbot/clawdbot★ 394k100% same
- steipete/clawdis★ 394k100% same
- openclaw/openclaw★ 394k100% same
- molt-bot/clawdbot★ 391k100% same
- friuns2/openclaw-android-assistant★ 573100% same
- OpenClawAndroid/openclaw-android-assistant★ 556100% same
- clawsouls/soulclaw★ 9100% same
1 more not listed
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use openclaw-performance.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
clawdbotSkillopenclaw-performance
Performance work in OpenClaw: a slow or heavy flow (latency, CPU, memory, SQL, RPC, renders), writing or reviewing a perf PR, or adding a cache. Count the work, delete waste first, cache last.
Also in 6 projects that use this
In this repository107 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- extensions/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- scripts/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- test/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ui/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-transcriptSkill
- auto-qaSkill
- autoreviewSkill
- channel-message-flowsSkill
- clawdtributorSkill
- claw-scoreSkill
- clawsweeperSkill
- control-ui-e2eSkill
- crabboxSkill
- discord-clawdSkill
- discord-e2eSkill
- discord-user-postSkill
- discrawlSkill
- gitcrawlSkill
- graincrawlSkill
- notcrawlSkill
- openclaw-changelog-updateSkill
- openclaw-ci-limitsSkill
- openclaw-debuggingSkill
- openclaw-ghsa-maintainerSkill
- openclaw-live-updaterSkill
- openclaw-parallels-smokeSkill
- openclaw-pr-maintainerSkill
- openclaw-qa-testingSkill
- openclaw-refactor-docsSkill
- openclaw-release-validationSkill
- openclaw-repair-sweepSkill
- openclaw-secret-scanning-maintainerSkill
- openclaw-test-heap-leaksSkill
- openclaw-testingSkill
- openclaw-test-performanceSkill
- openclaw-updateSkill
- parallels-discord-roundtripSkill
- plugin-sdk-impactSkill
- proof-videoSkill
- prototype-openclaw-tuiSkill
- pr-simplifySkill
- release-openclaw-announcementSkill
- release-openclaw-ciSkill
- release-openclaw-macSkill
- release-openclaw-maintainerSkill
- release-openclaw-plugin-testingSkill
- security-triageSkill
- slack-e2eSkill
- slacrawlSkill
- solidSkill
- tag-duplicate-prs-issuesSkill
- technical-documentationSkill
- telegram-e2e-userbotSkill
- test-auditSkill
- update-team-serverSkill
- verify-releaseSkill
- 1passwordSkill
- apple-notesSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

