plugin-sdk-impact
Skill59 starsChanged 16 days agoMITView on GitHub
Query how many public plugins use a Plugin SDK method, optionally by recent release date, and assess SDK deprecation or behavior changes using live ClawHub evidence.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 2 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
2
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Use the current ClawHub inventory to inform the maintainer's compatibility decision.
- Common: line 54
Never infer permission from the count.
- Common: line 92
Do not dismiss a security issue just because no consumers were observed.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Plugin SDK impact
Use the current ClawHub inventory to inform the maintainer's compatibility decision. Static usage identifies dependencies; it does not prove execution or reliance on a particular behavior. Keep the approval and deprecation rules in the SDK boundary guide authoritative.
Investigate
- Identify every affected public surface from source, including alternate SDK exports and runtime paths. Verify spelling against the definition and known callers; an incorrect key can return a convincing zero. Search bundled callers locally as well: the registry only covers published public plugins.
Query each canonical key using the bundled helper:
node {baseDir}/scripts/query.mjs 'api-member:api.registerTool'For “updated within the last three months”, add
--months 3. This means the latest eligible public release was uploaded within three calendar months of now, measured in UTC (month ends are clamped). Listing edits and rescans do not count as updates. The stored release date is its creation/upload time; public approval can happen later.--since 2026-07-16T12:00:00Zaccepts an explicit cutoff. Report the exact inclusive cutoff fromreleaseWindow, not a guessed date. Both consumers and coverage use the same window on every page.The helper follows all usage and coverage pages, including empty intermediate pages. Counts and coverage include every result;
items,gaps, andwarningscontain bounded examples with omitted counts inoutput.omitted. Mixed references count in both runtime and type totals. For an investigation needing every consumer or gap, save--fulloutput to a file and read it in sections:node {baseDir}/scripts/query.mjs 'api-member:api.registerTool' --full > sdk-usage.json--helpdocuments local endpoint and traversal limits.- Inspect matched evidence against the proposed change. A method call may not use the behavior being changed. Type-only consumers still matter for type/export removal. Query related members separately; a module import does not prove use of every export. Repeated references in a plugin count as one consumer.
- For a usage-count question, report the key, query time, exact release window (if requested), distinct plugins, and coverage gaps. For a proposed SDK change, also report matched evidence, local callers, and your compatibility recommendation. Finish change investigations with the maintainer's decision: preserve behavior, deprecate with migration, or proceed under existing policy. Never infer permission from the count.
Canonical keys
| Surface | Example |
| SDK module | sdk-module:openclaw/plugin-sdk/core |
| Named SDK export | sdk-export:openclaw/plugin-sdk/core#OpenClawPluginApi |
| Plugin API method | api-member:api.registerTool |
| Host runtime member | runtime-member:runtime.channel.reply.dispatchReplyFromConfig |
| Named hook | hook:hook.before_agent_start |
| Manifest contract | manifest-contract:manifest.contracts.tools:example_tool |
Keys describe SDK identities, not local aliases. api.runtime members normalize
to runtime.*. The inventory includes supported and deprecated references;
nonempty deprecationCodes selects entries associated with existing warnings.
Per-plugin inspection is available at
https://clawhub.ai/api/v1/sdk-usage/plugin?package=<encoded-name>; follow its
nextCursor until null to obtain the full inventory.
Interpret the result
| Result | Report |
| Observed consumers | “N current public plugins reference this surface.” Inspect their evidence before judging a behavior change. |
| No observed consumers, complete coverage | “No static references detected across N eligible public plugin artifacts.” This excludes private/unpublished plugins and unbundled dependencies; it is not proof that nobody uses the API. |
| Partial, failed, missing, incompatible, or unresolved analysis | State observed matches, gap counts, and representative gaps. Zero matches leaves impact unknown. |
| Empty corpus | No eligible plugins were observed; this provides no ecosystem assurance. |
| Unavailable endpoint, malformed result, or incomplete traversal | Impact is unknown. Preserve the error and use local evidence; never substitute zero. |
Coverage is tied to current release/artifact and analysis versions. Eligible
reports have inputKind: "artifact"; a source-checkout benchmark cannot establish
what a published package contains. An old scan
timestamp alone does not make an immutable artifact stale. Evidence is sampled;
each scan reports its evidence/unknown limits. Pages are live reads, not one
snapshot: rerun if releases or visibility change during the investigation. The
helper flags changes it observes but cannot establish a transaction-wide snapshot.
Do not dismiss a security issue just because no consumers were observed. Describe how usage evidence affects compatibility risk; security and SDK owners still decide the fix and any exception to the normal migration window.
Trending
Surging: 3 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 6
- steipete/warelay★ 394k54% same
- moltbot/clawdbot★ 394k54% same
- moltbot/moltbot★ 394k54% same
- clawdbot/clawdbot★ 394k54% same
- steipete/clawdis★ 394k54% same
- openclaw/openclaw★ 394k54% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use openclaw-performance.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
clawdbotSkillopenclaw-performance
Performance work in OpenClaw: a slow or heavy flow (latency, CPU, memory, SQL, RPC, renders), writing or reviewing a perf PR, or adding a cache. Count the work, delete waste first, cache last.
Also in 6 projects that use this
In this repository107 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- extensions/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- scripts/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- test/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ui/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-transcriptSkill
- auto-qaSkill
- autoreviewSkill
- channel-message-flowsSkill
- clawdtributorSkill
- claw-scoreSkill
- clawsweeperSkill
- control-ui-e2eSkill
- crabboxSkill
- discord-clawdSkill
- discord-e2eSkill
- discord-user-postSkill
- discrawlSkill
- gitcrawlSkill
- graincrawlSkill
- notcrawlSkill
- openclaw-changelog-updateSkill
- openclaw-ci-limitsSkill
- openclaw-debuggingSkill
- openclaw-docker-e2e-authoringSkill
- openclaw-ghsa-maintainerSkill
- openclaw-live-updaterSkill
- openclaw-parallels-smokeSkill
- openclaw-pr-maintainerSkill
- openclaw-qa-testingSkill
- openclaw-refactor-docsSkill
- openclaw-release-validationSkill
- openclaw-repair-sweepSkill
- openclaw-secret-scanning-maintainerSkill
- openclaw-test-heap-leaksSkill
- openclaw-testingSkill
- openclaw-test-performanceSkill
- openclaw-updateSkill
- parallels-discord-roundtripSkill
- proof-videoSkill
- prototype-openclaw-tuiSkill
- pr-simplifySkill
- release-openclaw-announcementSkill
- release-openclaw-ciSkill
- release-openclaw-macSkill
- release-openclaw-maintainerSkill
- release-openclaw-plugin-testingSkill
- security-triageSkill
- slack-e2eSkill
- slacrawlSkill
- solidSkill
- tag-duplicate-prs-issuesSkill
- technical-documentationSkill
- telegram-e2e-userbotSkill
- test-auditSkill
- update-team-serverSkill
- verify-releaseSkill
- 1passwordSkill
- apple-notesSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

