slack-e2e
Skill59 starsChanged 16 days agoMITView on GitHub
Test Slack with Convex-leased user OAuth or QA bots; check credentials, exercise owned messages, prove Gateway behavior, and distinguish API evidence from real Slack client interactions.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 17
Start from a source checkout with normal dependencies and an existing Convex login.
- Distinctive: line 36
Read user OAuth setup and recovery for the pool payload, permissions, result interpretation, and failure handling.
- Distinctive: line 44
Use the source-checkout QA Lab owner for Gateway proof, not a separate bot runner.
- Distinctive: line 49
Use the existing Convex login above.
- Distinctive: line 68
Run the native lifecycle recipe:
- Distinctive: line 82
Read the summary, evidence, and cleanup result before claiming success.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Slack agent E2E
Choose the proof
| Goal | Entry point | Boundary |
| Check shared user OAuth | Read-only command below | User/workspace identity and channel history; no Gateway |
| Exercise user-authored text | Same command with --smoke | Create, read, edit, delete, verify absence; no Gateway reply claim |
| Prove OpenClaw ingress, replies, tools, files, or restart | Existing QA Lab lane below | Leased driver/SUT bots and an isolated Gateway |
| Prove real clicks, slash commands, or rendering | Authorized Slack client | Actual client observation, not reconstructed API data |
Start from a source checkout with normal dependencies and an existing Convex
login. If needed, ask the operator to run convex login or the cached
bunx --no-install convex login. The broker provides the authorized pool;
agents do not need to copy Slack tokens. Login alone cannot supply a missing
pool credential or grant Slack permissions.
User OAuth: no QA Lab run
node .agents/skills/slack-e2e/scripts/user-oauth-smoke.mjs
node .agents/skills/slack-e2e/scripts/user-oauth-smoke.mjs --smokeThe default is read-only in Slack; both modes acquire, heartbeat, and release
a Convex lease. --smoke creates one synthetic, unmentioned top-level message,
checks stored authorship, edits it, and deletes that exact message. Existing
workspace listeners can still observe it. Each command uses a new private
artifact directory and prints a safe result plus its path.
Read user OAuth setup and recovery for the pool payload,
permissions, result interpretation, and failure handling. This skill-owned
command reuses the existing lease helper; it changes no QA Lab code or release
lane and starts no Gateway or model. It does not add a user-driver option to
qa slack.
Existing Gateway lane
Use the source-checkout QA Lab owner for Gateway proof, not a separate bot runner. A run owns a leased driver/SUT pair, a temporary Gateway, native fixture receipts, and private artifacts. The driver has no Socket Mode connection: the SUT Gateway exclusively owns the app token and event delivery.
- Use the existing Convex login above. No Slack tokens, broker secrets, model credentials, app creation, or scope grants belong in the command line.
Inspect the available scenarios and run readiness:
pnpm openclaw qa slack --list-scenarios pnpm openclaw qa slack --doctor --output-dir .artifacts/qa-e2e/slack-doctorDoctor checks the actual lease: distinct bot identities in one workspace, both bots' channel access, the owned Gateway connection, and advertised OAuth scopes. Known missing scopes fail with their actor and exact names. Missing scope metadata means mutation capability is unverified, not granted. Missing optional file/reaction scopes do not block text-only flows; they block the affected native operations before dispatch. Doctor's full lifecycle capability verdict remains separate from mandatory connection readiness. A pool/login/permission failure is an owner prerequisite, not a reason to rotate credentials until one passes. Every subsequent run checks its own lease.
Run the native lifecycle recipe:
pnpm openclaw qa slack \ --scenario-file qa/scenarios/channels/slack-e2e-lifecycle.yaml \ --output-dir .artifacts/qa-e2e/slack-lifecycle--doctorand--scenario-filedefault to Convex, the CI role, andmock-openai. This is real Slack/Gateway transport with a deterministic model. Explicit overrides remain available; ordinary curatedqa slackdefaults do not change. Use a unique output directory per run. Additional--scenario-filearguments select additional complete YAML scenarios.- Read the summary, evidence, and cleanup result before claiming success. Choose feature recipes for native operations or model-tool evidence, and runtime recipes for config/restart, custom flows, cancellation, artifacts, and recovery.
Evidence boundary
| Surface | What automation proves |
| Mention/quiet ingress, owned edits/deletes, reactions, upload, thread replies | Fixture/API operations and explicit stored readback; not model tool calls |
| Correlated SUT reply | A stored reply from the leased SUT after ingress; mock or live model must be named |
| Gateway debug-proxy capture | Slack accepted a Gateway API write; neither Socket Mode event delivery nor rendering |
| Block Kit, file IDs, reaction state | Stored structure/identity only |
| Human slash invocation, real button clicks, Agent View, visible rendering, human typing | Manual/Mantis client lane; bot/API evidence is insufficient |
For visual or human-interaction requests, use an authorized, logged-in Slack
client; the maintained Mantis workflow is in
docs/concepts/qa-e2e-automation/operator-flow.md. Check which surface it actually
captured: --approval-checkpoints renders API message data, not the Slack client.
A Slack sign-in screenshot is not proof of a workspace action.
Preserve inspected client screenshots alongside native evidence. Posting slash
text through the API is not a slash invocation; Gateway approval RPCs are not
button clicks. Do not infer typing from assistant status or start another Socket
Mode recorder with the SUT app token.
Completion
Report scenario/model lane, stored native identities or safe counts, artifact paths, cleanup outcome, missing permissions, and any manual-only gap. Keep raw Gateway capture, channel IDs, messages, media, and lease material private; publish only sanitized proof. A successful API response with failed stored readback, an uncertain send, or failed cleanup is not an end-to-end pass.
Other versions9 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 9
- steipete/warelay★ 394k100% same
- moltbot/clawdbot★ 394k100% same
- moltbot/moltbot★ 394k100% same
- clawdbot/clawdbot★ 394k100% same
- steipete/clawdis★ 394k100% same
- openclaw/openclaw★ 394k100% same
- molt-bot/clawdbot★ 391k100% same
- friuns2/openclaw-android-assistant★ 573100% same
- OpenClawAndroid/openclaw-android-assistant★ 556100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use openclaw-performance.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
clawdbotSkillopenclaw-performance
Performance work in OpenClaw: a slow or heavy flow (latency, CPU, memory, SQL, RPC, renders), writing or reviewing a perf PR, or adding a cache. Count the work, delete waste first, cache last.
Also in 6 projects that use this
In this repository107 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- extensions/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- scripts/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- test/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ui/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-transcriptSkill
- auto-qaSkill
- autoreviewSkill
- channel-message-flowsSkill
- clawdtributorSkill
- claw-scoreSkill
- clawsweeperSkill
- control-ui-e2eSkill
- crabboxSkill
- discord-clawdSkill
- discord-e2eSkill
- discord-user-postSkill
- discrawlSkill
- gitcrawlSkill
- graincrawlSkill
- notcrawlSkill
- openclaw-changelog-updateSkill
- openclaw-ci-limitsSkill
- openclaw-debuggingSkill
- openclaw-docker-e2e-authoringSkill
- openclaw-ghsa-maintainerSkill
- openclaw-live-updaterSkill
- openclaw-parallels-smokeSkill
- openclaw-pr-maintainerSkill
- openclaw-qa-testingSkill
- openclaw-refactor-docsSkill
- openclaw-release-validationSkill
- openclaw-repair-sweepSkill
- openclaw-secret-scanning-maintainerSkill
- openclaw-test-heap-leaksSkill
- openclaw-testingSkill
- openclaw-test-performanceSkill
- openclaw-updateSkill
- parallels-discord-roundtripSkill
- plugin-sdk-impactSkill
- proof-videoSkill
- prototype-openclaw-tuiSkill
- pr-simplifySkill
- release-openclaw-announcementSkill
- release-openclaw-ciSkill
- release-openclaw-macSkill
- release-openclaw-maintainerSkill
- release-openclaw-plugin-testingSkill
- security-triageSkill
- slacrawlSkill
- solidSkill
- tag-duplicate-prs-issuesSkill
- technical-documentationSkill
- telegram-e2e-userbotSkill
- test-auditSkill
- update-team-serverSkill
- verify-releaseSkill
- 1passwordSkill
- apple-notesSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

