agentleFS
bighamxbighamx/openclaw-android-node-apk/.agents/skills/openclaw-qa-testing/SKILL.md

openclaw-qa-testing

Skill59 starsChanged 16 days agoMITView on GitHub

Run, watch, debug, extend, or explain OpenClaw qa-lab and qa-channel scenarios, artifacts, and live lanes.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

30 rules. 6 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 16 are very specific to this project.

  • 6

    Common

    Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 8

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 16

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use this skill for qa-lab / qa-channel work.

    line 8
  2. Very specific:

    Do not pass --model, --alt-model, or --fast by default.

    line 23
  3. Common:

    Read the scenario pack and current suite implementation.

    line 32
  4. Very specific:

    If the user wants to watch the live UI, find the current openclaw-qa listen port and report http://127.0.0.1:<port>.

    line 47
  5. Common:

    If a scenario fails, fix the product or harness root cause, then rerun the full lane.

    line 48
  6. Very specific:

    Use op only inside tmux for QA secret lookup in this repo.

    line 65
  7. Distinctive:

    If a required value is missing from those notes:

    line 88
  8. Distinctive:

    ask the maintainer/operator for the current value or the current 1Password item name

    line 90
  9. Distinctive:

    Prefer direct Telegram envs for the npm Telegram Docker lane when available:

    line 94
  10. Distinctive:

    Prefer Convex mode when the goal is stable shared QA infra:

    line 105
  11. Very specific:

    do not assume OPENCLAW_QA_PROVIDER_MODE is consumed by that wrapper

    line 111
  12. Very specific:

    if a 1Password note only gives OPENCLAW_QA_PROVIDER_MODE, map it explicitly to OPENCLAW_NPM_TELEGRAM_PROVIDER_MODE before running the …

    line 112
  13. Very specific:

    If direct Telegram env is missing locally and op signin blocks, prefer dispatching the manual GitHub lane because the qa-live-shared …

    line 122
  14. Very specific:

    Use this when setting up or replacing Convex kind=whatsapp credentials.

    line 139
  15. Distinctive:

    Treat WhatsApp QA credentials as operator-owned live accounts, not generated fixtures.

    line 141
  16. Distinctive:

    Use two dedicated WhatsApp-capable test numbers: one driver account and one SUT account.

    line 142
  17. Distinctive:

    Keep credential material out of the repo, logs, PRs, and screenshots.

    line 147
  18. Distinctive:

    If WhatsApp expires or invalidates a linked Web session, relink locally, package fresh auth archives, add a new Convex row, then disable …

    line 149
  19. Very specific:

    Use qa character-eval for style/persona/vibe checks across multiple live models.

    line 153
  20. Very specific:

    Do not add new examples with separate --model-thinking.

    line 169
  21. Very specific:

    Keep prompts natural and task-shaped.

    line 176
  22. Common:

    Prefer at least one real task, such as creating or editing a tiny workspace artifact, so the transcript captures character under normal …

    line 177
  23. Very specific:

    Use model refs shaped like codex-cli/<codex-model> whenever QA should exercise Codex as a model backend.

    line 181
  24. Common:

    Treat the concrete Codex model name as user/config input.

    line 200
  25. Very specific:

    If Codex returns fallback/auth text every turn, first check CODEX_HOME, relevant secret-backed auth, and gateway child logs before changing …

    line 203
  26. Common:

    prefer stable final reply evidence over transient child-session listing

    line 233
  27. Very specific:

    Add or update scenario YAML under qa/scenarios/.

    line 239
  28. Very specific:

    Keep kickoff expectations in qa/scenarios/index.yaml aligned

    line 241
  29. Very specific:

    Add executable coverage in extensions/qa-lab/src/suite.ts

    line 242
  30. Common:

    Prefer end-to-end assertions over mock-only checks

    line 243

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

OpenClaw QA Testing

Use this skill for qa-lab / qa-channel work. Repo-local QA only.

Read first

  • docs/concepts/qa-e2e-automation.md
  • docs/help/testing.md
  • docs/channels/qa-channel.md
  • qa/README.md
  • qa/scenarios/index.yaml
  • extensions/qa-lab/src/suite.ts
  • extensions/qa-lab/src/character-eval.ts

Model policy

  • Normal live suite runs rely on QA Lab source- and auth-aware defaults.
  • Do not pass --model, --alt-model, or --fast by default. Omitted --fast does not mean fast is disabled; fast behavior is source-owned.
  • For scenario-specific runs, the complete execution.summary is authoritative and overrides generic default guidance, including when it requires other flags. Add explicit provider/model pins only when execution.config.requiredProvider or requiredModel requires them.

Default workflow

  1. Read the scenario pack and current suite implementation.
  2. Decide lane:
    • mock/dev: mock-openai
    • real validation: live-frontier
  3. For a normal live suite, use:
pnpm openclaw qa suite \
  --provider-mode live-frontier \
  --output-dir .artifacts/qa-e2e/run-all-live-frontier-<tag>
  1. Watch outputs:
    • summary: .artifacts/qa-e2e/run-all-live-frontier-<tag>/qa-suite-summary.json
    • report: .artifacts/qa-e2e/run-all-live-frontier-<tag>/qa-suite-report.md
  2. If the user wants to watch the live UI, find the current openclaw-qa listen port and report http://127.0.0.1:<port>.
  3. If a scenario fails, fix the product or harness root cause, then rerun the full lane.

OTEL smoke

For local QA-lab OpenTelemetry validation, use:

pnpm qa:otel:smoke

This starts a local OTLP/HTTP trace receiver, runs the otel-trace-smoke scenario through qa-channel, decodes the emitted protobuf spans, and verifies the exported trace names and privacy contract. It does not require Opik, Langfuse, or external collector credentials.

QA credentials and 1Password

  • Use op only inside tmux for QA secret lookup in this repo.
  • Quick auth check inside tmux:
op account list
  • Direct Telegram npm live test secrets currently live in 1Password item:
    • vault: OpenClaw
    • item: Telegram E2E
  • That item is the first place to look for:
    • OPENCLAW_QA_TELEGRAM_DRIVER_BOT_TOKEN
    • OPENCLAW_QA_TELEGRAM_SUT_BOT_TOKEN
    • OPENCLAW_QA_PROVIDER_MODE
    • OPENCLAW_NPM_TELEGRAM_PACKAGE_SPEC
  • Convex QA secrets currently live in 1Password items:
    • vault: OpenClaw
    • item: OPENCLAW_QA_CONVEX_SITE_URL
    • item: OPENCLAW_QA_CONVEX_SECRET_MAINTAINER
    • item: OPENCLAW_QA_CONVEX_SECRET_CI
  • Additional related notes/login items seen during QA credential work:
    • vault: Private
    • items: OPENCLAW QA, Convex, Telegram
  • If a required value is missing from those notes:
    • do not guess
    • ask the maintainer/operator for the current value or the current 1Password item name
    • for Telegram direct runs, OPENCLAW_QA_TELEGRAM_GROUP_ID may be stored separately from Telegram E2E
    • for Convex runs, the leased Telegram credential should provide the Telegram group id and bot tokens together; do not require a separate OPENCLAW_QA_TELEGRAM_GROUP_ID
    • for Convex runs, prefer OpenClaw/OPENCLAW_QA_CONVEX_SITE_URL; if that is stale or unclear, ask for the active pool URL before running
  • Prefer direct Telegram envs for the npm Telegram Docker lane when available:
OPENCLAW_QA_TELEGRAM_GROUP_ID="..." \
OPENCLAW_QA_TELEGRAM_DRIVER_BOT_TOKEN="..." \
OPENCLAW_QA_TELEGRAM_SUT_BOT_TOKEN="..." \
OPENCLAW_QA_PROVIDER_MODE="mock-openai" \
OPENCLAW_NPM_TELEGRAM_PACKAGE_SPEC="openclaw@beta" \
pnpm test:docker:npm-telegram-live
  • Prefer Convex mode when the goal is stable shared QA infra:
    • round-robin credential leasing
    • thinner wrapper for channel-specific setup
    • CLI/admin flows around the pooled credentials
  • Live npm Telegram Docker lane note:
    • scripts/e2e/npm-telegram-live-runner.ts reads OPENCLAW_NPM_TELEGRAM_PROVIDER_MODE
    • do not assume OPENCLAW_QA_PROVIDER_MODE is consumed by that wrapper
    • if a 1Password note only gives OPENCLAW_QA_PROVIDER_MODE, map it explicitly to OPENCLAW_NPM_TELEGRAM_PROVIDER_MODE before running the Docker lane
  • Verified live shape:
    • Convex mode can pass the real Docker lane without direct Telegram env vars
    • leased Telegram payload includes the group id coupled to the driver/SUT tokens
    • a real run of pnpm test:docker:npm-telegram-live passed with:
      • OPENCLAW_QA_CREDENTIAL_SOURCE=convex
      • OPENCLAW_QA_CREDENTIAL_ROLE=maintainer
      • OPENCLAW_QA_CONVEX_SITE_URL
      • OPENCLAW_QA_CONVEX_SECRET_MAINTAINER
      • OPENCLAW_NPM_TELEGRAM_PROVIDER_MODE=mock-openai
  • If direct Telegram env is missing locally and op signin blocks, prefer dispatching the manual GitHub lane because the qa-live-shared environment already has Convex CI credentials:
gh workflow run "NPM Telegram Beta E2E" --repo openclaw/openclaw --ref main \
  -f package_spec=openclaw@YYYY.M.D-beta.N \
  -f package_label=openclaw@YYYY.M.D-beta.N \
  -f provider_mode=mock-openai
  • Poll the exact run id from the dispatch URL. gh run view --json artifacts is not supported; list artifacts with:
gh api repos/openclaw/openclaw/actions/runs/<run-id>/artifacts

WhatsApp live credentials

Use this when setting up or replacing Convex kind=whatsapp credentials.

  • Treat WhatsApp QA credentials as operator-owned live accounts, not generated fixtures.
  • Use two dedicated WhatsApp-capable test numbers: one driver account and one SUT account. Do not use personal numbers or personal OpenClaw WhatsApp accounts in the shared pool.
  • Register and link each account manually with WhatsApp or WhatsApp Business, storing Web auth only in isolated local auth dirs outside the repo.
  • For group coverage, create a dedicated test group that includes both QA accounts and store its JID as groupJid; otherwise the group mention-gating scenario should be skipped by default and fail when explicitly requested.
  • Package the two Baileys auth dirs into base64 .tgz payload fields and add a new active Convex credential row. Prefer adding a fresh row and disabling stale/broken rows over overwriting credentials in place.
  • Expected payload fields: driverPhoneE164, sutPhoneE164, driverAuthArchiveBase64, sutAuthArchiveBase64, and optional groupJid.
  • Keep credential material out of the repo, logs, PRs, and screenshots. Redact phone numbers unless the operator explicitly asks for local debugging.
  • Validate with pnpm openclaw qa whatsapp --credential-source convex --credential-role maintainer --provider-mode mock-openai and preserve artifact paths plus redacted pass/fail summaries.
  • If WhatsApp expires or invalidates a linked Web session, relink locally, package fresh auth archives, add a new Convex row, then disable the stale row.

Character evals

Use qa character-eval for style/persona/vibe checks across multiple live models.

pnpm openclaw qa character-eval \
  --output-dir .artifacts/qa-e2e/character-eval-<tag>
  • Runs local QA gateway child processes, not Docker.
  • Packaged pnpm build omits QA Lab + qa-channel by design (source-checkout only). To exercise openclaw qa/qa-channel from a built dist, build with OPENCLAW_BUILD_PRIVATE_QA=1 pnpm build (emits dist/plugin-sdk/qa-lab.js, qa-runtime.js, dist/extensions/{qa-lab,qa-channel}) or run via pnpm dev.
  • With no model flags, character eval uses its current source-defined candidate, judge, thinking, and fast defaults.
  • Repeat --model provider/model,thinking=<level>[,fast|,no-fast|,fast=<bool>] or --judge-model ... only to replace the corresponding inventory explicitly.
  • Do not add new examples with separate --model-thinking; keep that flag as legacy compatibility only.
  • Report includes judge ranking, run stats, durations, and full transcripts; do not include raw judge replies. Duration is benchmark context, not a grading signal.
  • Candidate and judge concurrency default to 16. Use --concurrency <n> and --judge-concurrency <n> to override when local gateways or provider limits need a gentler lane.
  • Scenario source is YAML-only under qa/scenarios/: use index.yaml and per-scenario *.yaml files with top-level title, scenario, and optional flow. Never add fenced qa-scenario / qa-flow Markdown files.
  • For isolated character/persona evals, write the persona into SOUL.md and blank IDENTITY.md in the scenario flow. Use SOUL.md + IDENTITY.md only when intentionally testing how the normal OpenClaw identity combines with the character.
  • Keep prompts natural and task-shaped. The candidate model should receive character setup through SOUL.md, then normal user turns such as chat, workspace help, and small file tasks; do not ask "how would you react?" or tell the model it is in an eval.
  • Prefer at least one real task, such as creating or editing a tiny workspace artifact, so the transcript captures character under normal tool use instead of pure roleplay.

Codex CLI model lane

Use model refs shaped like codex-cli/<codex-model> whenever QA should exercise Codex as a model backend.

Examples:

pnpm openclaw qa suite \
  --provider-mode live-frontier \
  --model codex-cli/<codex-model> \
  --alt-model codex-cli/<codex-model> \
  --scenario <scenario-id> \
  --output-dir .artifacts/qa-e2e/codex-<tag>
pnpm openclaw qa manual \
  --model codex-cli/<codex-model> \
  --message "Reply exactly: CODEX_OK"
  • Treat the concrete Codex model name as user/config input; do not hardcode it in source, docs examples, or scenarios.
  • Live QA preserves CODEX_HOME so Codex CLI auth/config works while keeping HOME and OPENCLAW_HOME sandboxed.
  • Mock QA should scrub CODEX_HOME.
  • If Codex returns fallback/auth text every turn, first check CODEX_HOME, relevant secret-backed auth, and gateway child logs before changing scenario assertions.
  • For model comparison, include codex-cli/<codex-model> as another candidate in qa character-eval; the report should label it as an opaque model name.

Repo facts

  • Seed scenarios live in qa/scenarios/index.yaml and qa/scenarios/<theme>/*.yaml.
  • Main live runner: extensions/qa-lab/src/suite.ts
  • QA lab server: extensions/qa-lab/src/lab-server.ts
  • Child gateway harness: extensions/qa-lab/src/gateway-child.ts
  • Synthetic channel: extensions/qa-channel/

What “done” looks like

  • Full suite green for the requested lane.
  • User gets:
    • watch URL if applicable
    • pass/fail counts
    • artifact paths
    • concise note on what was fixed

Common failure patterns

  • Live timeout too short:
    • widen live waits in extensions/qa-lab/src/suite.ts
  • Discovery cannot find repo files:
    • point prompts at repo/... inside seeded workspace
  • Subagent proof too brittle:
    • prefer stable final reply evidence over transient child-session listing
  • Harness “rebuild” delay:
    • dirty tree can trigger a pre-run build; expect that before ports appear

When adding scenarios

  • Add or update scenario YAML under qa/scenarios/; do not add .md scenario files or fenced YAML blocks.
  • Keep kickoff expectations in qa/scenarios/index.yaml aligned
  • Add executable coverage in extensions/qa-lab/src/suite.ts
  • Prefer end-to-end assertions over mock-only checks
  • Save outputs under .artifacts/qa-e2e/

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.