acceptance-criteria-builder
Skill3 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Turn a locked 3D brief plus chosen recipe into a measurable acceptance checklist with evidence hooks.
In this repository49 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- asset-discoverySkill
- asset-fallback-strategySkill
- asset-library-planSkill
- asset-license-checkerSkill
- asset-style-checkSkill
- blender-brainstormingSkill
- blender-recipe-decomposerSkill
- blender-troubleshootingSkill
- blendops-helpSkill
- bridge-conflictsSkill
- camera-compositionSkill
- character-portraitSkill
- cli-appendix-job-outlineSkill
- color-management-decisionSkill
- composition-quality-checkerSkill
- cycles-vs-eevee-decisionSkill
- done-criteriaSkill
- environment-shotSkill
- glb-animation-handoffSkill
- glb-web-handoffSkill
- intent-to-3d-brief-writerSkill
- interior-sceneSkill
- lighting-material-planSkill
- lighting-quality-checkerSkill
- material-quality-checkerSkill
- mobile-glb-budgetSkill
- output-format-decisionSkill
- pack-prerequisite-checkerSkill
- path-one-host-outlineSkill
- plain-language-responseSkill
- polycount-budget-checkerSkill
- pre-handoff-verificationSkill
- preview-reportSkill
- product-grid-scene-plannerSkill
- product-hero-scene-plannerSkill
- r3f-component-planSkill
- recipe-fit-assessorSkill
- render-export-evidenceSkill
- resolution-aspect-decisionSkill
- runtime-attempt-reportSkill
- runtime-path-pickerSkill
- runtime-readinessSkill
- runtime-setupSkill
- scene-readinessSkill
- scope-guardSkill
- stage-gatesSkill
- <skill-name>Skill
- workflow-stage-routerSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
14 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 13 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
13
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 21
after a brief is locked with intent-to-3d-brief-writer and a recipe is chosen, before expensive render or export stages
- Distinctive: line 22
when translating qualitative brief goals into measurable checklist rows with evidence hooks
- Very specific: line 23
after scope-guard approves a brief or recipe delta that requires updated acceptance rows
- Very specific: line 85
Never attach false Verified hooks or claim Produced/Verified status from criteria writing alone.
- Very specific: line 131
Keep Runtime status: Not Run and Artifact status: Not Produced while authoring the table.
- Very specific: line 141
After scope-guard approves a brief or recipe change, update only the affected checklist rows and record the brief version ID in Evidence …
- Very specific: line 152
Add measurement rows with evidence hooks consumed by render-export-evidence and validators.
- Very specific: line 156
Keep the measurable criteria table intact, record the blocker under Limitations, and use only valid downgrade-only truth states (Runtime …
- Very specific: line 176
If the input brief is unlocked or missing core deliverable slots, do not invent criteria.
- Very specific: line 177
If the user asks to mark rows Verified during criteria authoring, refuse the upgrade, explain that acceptance-criteria-builder is …
- Very specific: line 178
If the prompt mixes acceptance criteria with legal asset-permission checks, strip the legal language from this checklist and route those …
- Very specific: line 179
If an upstream gate has already failed, preserve downgrade-only truth states and route to pre-handoff-verification.
- Very specific: line 191
Keep P0 rows concise, observable, and directly tied to a brief slot or recipe constraint (references/brief-to-criteria-mapper.md).
- Very specific: line 194
Always emit Runtime status: Not Run and Artifact status: Not Produced when publishing or updating criteria tables.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
acceptance-criteria-builder
Purpose
Turn a locked 3D brief plus chosen recipe into a measurable acceptance checklist (Criterion | Measurement | Evidence expected | Owner) with evidence hooks, consumed by validators, render-export-evidence, and pre-handoff-verification. This skill is planning-only: it never executes Blender or Python, never produces artifacts, and never verifies files itself.
Quick start
- ingest brief slots + recipe expectations
- expand using
references/checklist-patterns.md - attach evidence hooks per
references/evidence-hook-rules.md - format via
references/brief-to-criteria-mapper.md
When to use
- after a brief is locked with
intent-to-3d-brief-writerand a recipe is chosen, before expensive render or export stages - when translating qualitative brief goals into measurable checklist rows with evidence hooks
- after
scope-guardapproves a brief or recipe delta that requires updated acceptance rows
When not to use
<!-- blendops:generated:start exclusions -->- pure exploration without a locked deliverable → use
../blender-brainstorming/SKILL.md(use blender-brainstorming) - writing or locking the brief itself → use
../intent-to-3d-brief-writer/SKILL.md(use intent-to-3d-brief-writer) - pinning the stop or done condition → use
../done-criteria/SKILL.md(use done-criteria) - enforcing per-stage workflow gates → use
../stage-gates/SKILL.md(use stage-gates) - guarding or deciding scope boundaries → use
../scope-guard/SKILL.md(use scope-guard) - legal or license-permission language → use
../asset-license-checker/SKILL.md(use asset-license-checker) - classifying artifact evidence → use
../pre-handoff-verification/SKILL.md(use pre-handoff-verification)
<!-- blendops:generated:end exclusions -->Trigger phrases
<!-- blendops:generated:start triggers -->- "acceptance criteria"
- "measurable checklist rows"
- "evidence hooks for brief"
- "sign-off checklist table"
<!-- blendops:generated:end triggers -->Prerequisites / readiness
- brief considered locked enough for planners OR deltas explicitly listed
- recipe/pack anchor identified
Input schema
Required inputs
| Input | Why it is required |
| Locked brief summary | Source of target criteria (from intent-to-3d-brief-writer) |
| Chosen recipe | Anchors expected deliverables and stage checks |
| Priority outputs | Weights checklist rows (P0 vs secondary) |
Optional inputs
| Input | Use |
| Brand rubric | Adds objective rows |
| Platform constraints | Adds measurable thresholds |
Output schema
Primary output
- prioritized checklist table:
Criterion | Measurement | Evidence expected | Owner
Evidence / caveat output
Runtime status: Not Run | Attempted | Produced | Verified | Failed
Artifact status: Not Produced | Produced | Verified | Failed
Evidence used: <brief version ID + chosen recipe ID>
Limitations: <subjective rows flagged; planning-only — writing criteria never produces artifacts or verifies files>Rules for status reporting:
- Artifact status defaults to
Not Produced; Runtime status defaults toNot Runwhen generating criteria. - Truth states are downgrade-only, never upgrade.
- Never attach false
Verifiedhooks or claimProduced/Verifiedstatus from criteria writing alone.
Required laws
../../laws/evidence-before-done.md../../laws/non-blender-user-language.md../../laws/no-arbitrary-python-interface.md../../laws/official-runtime-only.md
Official runtime boundary
This skill is strictly planning-only (no Python, no Blender execution). Checklists may define expected runtime evidence hooks, but must never execute tasks, verify files, or upgrade truth states beyond what upstream evidence skills report.
Operating procedure
- Ingest the locked brief and chosen recipe to map fields into criterion categories.
- Convert qualitative goals into measurable thresholds (
Criterion | Measurement | Evidence expected | Owner) and explicitly flag any remaining subjective rows. - Attach expected evidence hooks (without claiming
ProducedorVerifiedstates) and route any license-permission items toasset-license-checker. - Hand off the checklist to stage validators,
render-export-evidencefor artifact classification, andpre-handoff-verificationfor handoff gating.
Decision tree
Is the 3D brief locked (or are approved deltas explicitly listed)?
No → stop and route to intent-to-3d-brief-writer (or blender-brainstorming if still exploratory)
Yes → continue
Is a target recipe or pack identified?
No → route to recipe-fit-assessor to anchor deliverable expectations
Yes → continue
Does the request ask to approve mid-stream scope additions?
Yes → route to scope-guard before updating acceptance rows
No → continue
Does a criterion involve asset licensing, redistribution, or attribution rules?
Yes → delegate license rows to asset-license-checker; keep technical/visual rows here
No → map brief slots to P0/P1/P2 rows with measurable thresholds and evidence hooks
Are any P0 rows inherently aesthetic or mood-driven (e.g., "cyberpunk atmosphere")?
Yes → pair with a proxy heuristic and mark as subjective requiring named stakeholder sign-off
No → attach objective validator and render-export-evidence ledger hooksPlaybooks
Playbook A: Product hero still + web GLB acceptance table
- Map brief subject, framing, lighting contrast, output resolution (
resolution-aspect-decision), file format (output-format-decision), and mobile/web GLB budget (mobile-glb-budget) intoCriterion | Measurement | Evidence expected | Ownerrows. - Tag contractually required deliverables as
P0and secondary polish items asP1/P2. - Keep
Runtime status: Not RunandArtifact status: Not Producedwhile authoring the table.
Playbook B: Subjective mood or brand aesthetic translation
- Decompose qualitative phrases (such as "warm luxury brass" or "wet neon street feel") into observable proxy measurements (key-to-fill contrast ratio notes, palette bounds, reflection roughness range) using
references/checklist-patterns.md. - Explicitly flag the remaining aesthetic judgment row as
[Subjective — requires stakeholder sign-off]in theMeasurementcolumn perreferences/evidence-hook-rules.md. - Forbid automatic
Verifiedhooks on subjective rows without recorded human approval.
Playbook C: Post-delta criteria revision
- After
scope-guardapproves a brief or recipe change, update only the affected checklist rows and record the brief version ID inEvidence used. - Preserve downgrade-only truth states (
Runtime status: Not Run,Artifact status: Not Produced) untilrender-export-evidencere-evaluates any affected outputs.
Mode handling
Text-only mode
Evidence hooks describe expected artifacts only. Set Runtime status: Not Run and Artifact status: Not Produced.
Runtime-ready mode
Add measurement rows with evidence hooks consumed by render-export-evidence and validators. Keep Artifact status: Not Produced until downstream evidence skills classify actual outputs.
Blocked runtime mode
Keep the measurable criteria table intact, record the blocker under Limitations, and use only valid downgrade-only truth states (Runtime status: Not Run or Failed; Artifact status: Not Produced or Failed — never invent a Blocked state).
Validation checklist
- Every P0 criterion is measurable or explicitly flagged as subjective
- Every P0 row includes
Criterion | Measurement | Evidence expected | Owner - No false
Verifiedhooks or upgraded truth states (Not Produceddefault preserved) - No license-permission language included (delegated to
asset-license-checker) - No role overlap with stop-condition, stage-gate, scope, or verification skills
Pass / Warn / Fail rubric
| Verdict | Criteria |
| Pass | P0 criteria measurable + evidence hooks attached + subjective rows flagged + default Not Produced preserved |
| Warn | Subjective-heavy list flagged for stakeholder sign-off |
| Fail | False Verified hooks, invalid or upgraded truth states (e.g., Blocked), license-permission rows written here, or claims of execution/verification |
Failure handling
- If the input brief is unlocked or missing core deliverable slots, do not invent criteria; return a blocked planning note with
Runtime status: Not RunandArtifact status: Not Producedand route tointent-to-3d-brief-writer. - If the user asks to mark rows
Verifiedduring criteria authoring, refuse the upgrade, explain thatacceptance-criteria-builderis planning-only, and route actual output files torender-export-evidence. - If the prompt mixes acceptance criteria with legal asset-permission checks, strip the legal language from this checklist and route those items to
asset-license-checker. - If an upstream gate has already failed, preserve downgrade-only truth states and route to
pre-handoff-verification.
Troubleshooting
| Symptom | Cause | Safe resolution |
| Checklist explodes beyond 15+ rows | Every minor scene detail was promoted to P0 | Apply references/brief-to-criteria-mapper.md (1–3 criteria per brief slot on first pass) and demote non-blocking polish to P1/P2. |
| Mood criterion has no testable threshold | Adjective copied verbatim from brief ("looks cinematic") | Pair with framing/lighting validator hooks (composition-quality-checker, lighting-quality-checker) and flag the residual aesthetic check for stakeholder sign-off. |
| Stakeholder treats checklist table as proof that files exist | Evidence hook column misread as completed verification | Restate Runtime status: Not Run and Artifact status: Not Produced, and clarify that Evidence expected describes future proof required by render-export-evidence. |
Best practices
- Keep
P0rows concise, observable, and directly tied to a brief slot or recipe constraint (references/brief-to-criteria-mapper.md). - Name the exact downstream validator or evidence skill in
Owner/Evidence expected(for example,polycount-budget-checker,mobile-glb-budget,render-export-evidence). - Separate objective technical thresholds from subjective creative sign-off rows so automated gates and human reviews never collide.
- Always emit
Runtime status: Not RunandArtifact status: Not Producedwhen publishing or updating criteria tables.
Good examples
- "
P0 | Hero PNG resolution & alpha | 2048x2048 RGBA PNG with transparent background | Output path + image header check in render-export-evidence (target: Verified) | render-export-evidence" - "
P0 | Web GLB file size & triangle budget | <= 5 MB total file size, <= 50k triangles | GLB inspection ledger via polycount-budget-checker + mobile-glb-budget | render-export-evidence" - "
P1 | Cyberpunk neon mood read [Subjective] | Cyan/magenta rim contrast + wet ground specular read; requires human art-direction sign-off | Preview render + signed stakeholder note | Stakeholder + lighting-quality-checker"
Bad examples
- "
P0 | Scene quality | Looks amazing and photorealistic | Engineer says it looks good | AI agent" — untestable adjective with a forbidden self-attestation hook. - "
P0 | Final GLB | Verified and ready for production | Artifact status: Verified | acceptance-criteria-builder" — fabricates artifact verification inside a planning-only skill. - "
P0 | Third-party sneaker logo license | Cleared for commercial resale | Checked by acceptance-criteria-builder | acceptance-criteria-builder" — violates role boundary withasset-license-checker.
User-facing response template
Brief & recipe anchor: <locked brief ID + chosen recipe/pack>
Acceptance criteria checklist:
| Priority | Criterion | Measurement | Evidence expected | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P0 | <criterion> | <measurable threshold or [Subjective] flag> | <artifact type + validator + target truth state> | <skill or stakeholder> |
| P1 | <criterion> | <measurable threshold or [Subjective] flag> | <artifact type + validator + target truth state> | <skill or stakeholder> |
Subjective sign-off notes: <rows requiring human stakeholder approval, or none>
Runtime status: Not Run
Artifact status: Not Produced
Evidence used: <brief version ID + recipe path + reference docs consulted>
Limitations: <planning-only checklist; does not execute Blender or verify files>
Next skill: <stage-gates | render-export-evidence | pre-handoff-verification>Anti-patterns
- Marking any row or output block
ProducedorVerifiedmerely because acceptance criteria were written. - Writing
Artifact status: Not Runinstead ofArtifact status: Not Produced(or inventing aBlockedtruth state). - Accepting vague adjectives ("clean", "pop", "realistic") as
P0measurements without either a quantifiable proxy or an explicit[Subjective]stakeholder sign-off flag. - Authoring legal copyright or license clearance criteria here instead of handing off to
asset-license-checker. - Replacing
done-criteria,stage-gates, orpre-handoff-verificationwith ad-hoc gate logic.
Cross-skill handoff
<!-- blendops:generated:start handoffs -->- [upstream_reference] Brief source →
../intent-to-3d-brief-writer/SKILL.md - [progression] Done / stop condition →
../done-criteria/SKILL.md - [progression] Per-stage gate enforcement →
../stage-gates/SKILL.md - [progression] Scope boundary enforcement →
../scope-guard/SKILL.md - [progression] License permissions →
../asset-license-checker/SKILL.md - [progression] Artifact evidence classification →
../render-export-evidence/SKILL.md - [progression] Handoff gate verification →
../pre-handoff-verification/SKILL.md
<!-- blendops:generated:end handoffs -->Non-goals
- Unlocking or rewriting the creative brief from scratch (use
intent-to-3d-brief-writer). - Executing Blender, generating Python scripts, or running automated file inspectors.
- Certifying that rendered images or exported GLB files actually meet the checklist (use
render-export-evidenceandpre-handoff-verification). - Providing legal advice or asset license clearance (use
asset-license-checker).
References
references/checklist-patterns.mdreferences/evidence-hook-rules.mdreferences/brief-to-criteria-mapper.md
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

