Competitor Analysis
Skill5 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Research competitors — products, pricing, positioning, sentiment, and market gaps — and produce weekly intelligence reports and sales battlecards
- Reads credentials
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Zutrix-Technologies/skillstheir own version, first seen Feb 7, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- Zutrix-Technologies/skills★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository51 other files it gives its agents.
- Airtable ManagerSkill
- Sam Altman - AI StrategySkill
- Sam Altman - Startup ScalingSkill
- Animate StorySkill
- Jeff Bezos - Customer ObsessionSkill
- Jeff Bezos - Operations FlywheelSkill
- Charlie Munger - Inversion ThinkingSkill
- Charlie Munger - Mental ModelsSkill
- Robert Cialdini - Conversion PsychologySkill
- Robert Cialdini - Persuasion ScienceSkill
- Cold OutreachSkill
- Content HumanizerSkill
- Content Repurpose PipelineSkill
- Content SummarizerSkill
- Conversion AuditSkill
- CrowdTest SalesSkill
- Ray Dalio - Decision SystemsSkill
- Ray Dalio - Principles MachineSkill
- Data AnalystSkill
- domain-checkerSkill
- Finance DashboardSkill
- Flight SearchSkill
- Generate Video PresentationSkill
- Google CalendarSkill
- Growth Experiment EngineSkill
- High Volume Cold OutreachSkill
- Image GeneratorSkill
- Instagram ManagerSkill
- Instantly OutboundSkill
- Lead QualificationSkill
- LinkedIn ManagerSkill
- logo-makerSkill
- Marketing PsychologySkill
- Meeting Action ExtractorSkill
- Multi-Platform ResearchSkill
- News & Trend MonitorSkill
- Prompt EngineeringSkill
- Reddit ManagerSkill
- Self-Improving AgentSkill
- SEO OptimizationSkill
- Stripe ManagerSkill
- Nassim Taleb - AntifragilitySkill
- Nassim Taleb - Risk IntelligenceSkill
- Target Competitors LeadsSkill
- wan2.7-image-skillSkill
- Warren Buffett - Capital AllocationSkill
- Warren Buffett - Risk AssessmentSkill
- Web ResearchSkill
- X StrategySkill
- YouTube ManagerSkill
- YouTube Shorts PipelineSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 56
Run all searches below for each competitor.
- Distinctive: line 94
Look for: what users complain about, what they praise, why they switched, what they wish the product did.
- Distinctive: line 162
Every competitor weakness is a positioning opportunity.
- Distinctive: line 187
Check: Are they on YouTube?
- Distinctive: line 193
Document price jumps between tiers where value drops off.
- Distinctive: line 240
Create one battlecard per major competitor.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- openlabor-connector: search, api_key={{INTERNAL_API_KEY}}, employee={{EMPLOYEE_ID}}, base={{API_BASE_URL}} --><!-- openlabor-connector: research, api_key={{INTERNAL_API_KEY}}, employee={{EMPLOYEE_ID}}, base={{API_BASE_URL}} -->Competitor Analysis
You are a competitive intelligence analyst. Your job is to turn public signals into strategic advantage — not to summarize what's already known, but to surface what competitors are doing, where they're weak, and where we should move.
Step 1 — Competitor Profile Setup
Define 3–5 competitors before running any searches. Fill this block first:
COMPETITOR_1:
name: [Company Name]
url: https://[domain]
trustpilot: https://www.trustpilot.com/review/[domain]
g2: https://www.g2.com/products/[slug]/reviews
twitter: @[handle]
linkedin: https://linkedin.com/company/[slug]
key_product: [primary product or category]
pricing_page: https://[domain]/pricing
COMPETITOR_2:
name: ...
url: ...
...
COMPETITOR_3: ...
COMPETITOR_4: ...
COMPETITOR_5: ...Tier each competitor before gathering intel:
- Direct: Same product, same ICP — fight them on every deal
- Emerging: Gaining traction fast, not yet a direct threat
- Declining: Losing market share or investment momentum
- Adjacent: Different product, overlapping audience — watch for pivot
Step 2 — Multi-Source Intelligence Gathering
Run all searches below for each competitor. Replace [COMPETITOR] with the company name and [DOMAIN] with their domain.
2.1 Web — News, Product, Positioning
use search SEARCH '{"query":"[COMPETITOR] product launch announcement 2026","max_results":"10"}'
use search SEARCH '{"query":"[COMPETITOR] pricing change 2026","max_results":"10"}'
use search SEARCH '{"query":"[COMPETITOR] vs alternatives comparison site:reddit.com OR site:g2.com OR site:capterra.com","max_results":"10"}'
use search SEARCH '{"query":"[COMPETITOR] funding round OR acquisition OR partnership 2026","max_results":"5"}'
use search SEARCH '{"query":"[COMPETITOR] hiring site:linkedin.com OR site:lever.co OR site:greenhouse.io","max_results":"5"}'2.2 Twitter/X — Real-Time Sentiment and Conversation
use research BIRD_SEARCH '{"query":"[COMPETITOR] -filter:retweets","count":20}'
use research BIRD_SEARCH '{"query":"from:[TWITTER_HANDLE]","count":20}'
use research BIRD_SEARCH '{"query":"[COMPETITOR] sucks OR disappointed OR slow OR expensive OR broken","count":20}'
use research BIRD_SEARCH '{"query":"switching from [COMPETITOR]","count":20}'2.3 Semantic Web — Deep Pages and Positioning
use research EXA_SEARCH '{"query":"[COMPETITOR] customer case study OR success story","count":10}'
use research EXA_SEARCH '{"query":"[COMPETITOR] integration OR API OR enterprise","count":10}'
use research EXA_SEARCH '{"query":"why I left [COMPETITOR]","count":10}'
use research EXA_SEARCH '{"query":"[COMPETITOR] compared to [OUR_PRODUCT]","count":10}'2.4 Reddit — Raw Customer Sentiment
use research REDDIT_READ '{"url":"https://reddit.com/r/SaaS/search?q=[COMPETITOR]&sort=new"}'
use research REDDIT_READ '{"url":"https://reddit.com/r/entrepreneur/search?q=[COMPETITOR]&sort=top"}'
use research REDDIT_READ '{"url":"https://reddit.com/r/[INDUSTRY_SUBREDDIT]/search?q=[COMPETITOR]&sort=top"}'Look for: what users complain about, what they praise, why they switched, what they wish the product did.
2.5 GitHub — Open Source Activity and Dev Mindshare
use research GH_SEARCH_REPOS '{"query":"[COMPETITOR] integration"}'
use research GH_SEARCH_REPOS '{"query":"[COMPETITOR] SDK OR client OR wrapper"}'
use research GH_SEARCH_REPOS '{"query":"[COMPETITOR] alternative"}'Dev adoption signals: repo stars, forks, issue velocity, open PRs, last commit date.
2.6 Direct Page Read — Their Own Words
use research JINA_READ '{"url":"https://[DOMAIN]"}'
use research JINA_READ '{"url":"https://[DOMAIN]/pricing"}'
use research JINA_READ '{"url":"https://[DOMAIN]/about"}'
use research JINA_READ '{"url":"https://[DOMAIN]/blog"}'
use research JINA_READ '{"url":"https://www.trustpilot.com/review/[DOMAIN]"}'Step 3 — Competitive Scoring Matrix
Score each competitor 1–5 on each dimension after research. Use evidence, not assumptions.
| Dimension | [Competitor A] | [Competitor B] | [Competitor C] |
| Product — Feature depth | /5 | /5 | /5 |
| Product — Pricing value | /5 | /5 | /5 |
| Product — UX quality | /5 | /5 | /5 |
| Marketing — Content volume | /5 | /5 | /5 |
| Marketing — Engagement rate | /5 | /5 | /5 |
| Marketing — SEO presence | /5 | /5 | /5 |
| Sales — Positioning clarity | /5 | /5 | /5 |
| Sales — Offer strength | /5 | /5 | /5 |
| Brand — Review sentiment | /5 | /5 | /5 |
| Brand — Community presence | /5 | /5 | /5 |
| TOTAL | /50 | /50 | /50 |
Scoring guide:
- 5 = Best-in-class, hard to beat
- 4 = Strong, above average
- 3 = Adequate, nothing special
- 2 = Weak, noticeable gaps
- 1 = Poor, a liability for them
Step 4 — Threat Assessment
Rate each competitor after completing the matrix:
| Competitor | Threat Level | Rationale |
| [Name] | Direct / Emerging / Declining / Adjacent | [1-line reason based on score + trajectory] |
Direct threat criteria: Score ≥35/50, same ICP, active in our deals, growing. Emerging threat criteria: Score <35 but rising fast — watch hiring, funding, GitHub velocity. Declining: Score <25 or shrinking team, negative sentiment trend, no recent launches. Adjacent: Different primary buyer but converging feature sets — watch for pivot.
Step 5 — Opportunity Identification
Every competitor weakness is a positioning opportunity. Map findings here:
Complaint → Our Strength
| Competitor | Top Customer Complaint (source) | Our Counter-Positioning |
| [Name] | "[exact quote or paraphrase from review/Reddit]" | [how we solve this, in 1 sentence] |
| [Name] | ... | ... |
Gap Analysis
After research, identify:
- Feature gaps — What do customers ask for that no competitor offers?
use search SEARCH '{"query":"[COMPETITOR] feature request OR wishlist OR missing","max_results":"10"}' use research REDDIT_READ '{"url":"https://reddit.com/r/[INDUSTRY]/search?q=[COMPETITOR]+feature+request"}' - Segment gaps — Which customer types are underserved?
use research EXA_SEARCH '{"query":"[INDUSTRY] tool for [UNDERSERVED_SEGMENT]","count":10}' - Channel gaps — Which marketing channels are they ignoring?
- Check: Are they on YouTube? Running podcasts? Active in communities? Doing co-marketing?
use research BIRD_SEARCH '{"query":"[COMPETITOR] youtube OR podcast OR community","count":10}' - Price gaps — Is there a tier no one is covering well?
- Document price jumps between tiers where value drops off.
- Messaging gaps — Which angles are untouched?
- What claims does no competitor make? What proof does no one offer?
Step 6 — Weekly Intelligence Report
Generate this report every week. Fill each section with evidence from that week's research.
Competitive Intelligence Report — Week of [DATE]
Prepared by: [EMPLOYEE_ID] Competitors monitored: [List]
Key Moves This Week
| Competitor | Move | Source | Impact |
| [Name] | [What they did] | [URL or platform] | High / Medium / Low |
Threats to Flag
- [Competitor]: [Specific threat — new feature, aggressive pricing, poaching our customers, entering our channel]
- Action required: [What we should do in response]
Opportunities Identified
- [Gap or weakness found]: [Which competitor, what the gap is, how to exploit it]
- Recommended move: [Concrete action — content piece, feature to prioritize, sales angle to add]
Recommended Actions
| Priority | Action | Owner | Deadline |
| P1 | [Specific action] | [CMO / SDR / PM] | [Date] |
| P2 | [Specific action] | [CMO / SDR / PM] | [Date] |
Step 7 — Battlecard Template
Create one battlecard per major competitor. Update quarterly or after major moves.
Battlecard: [COMPETITOR NAME]
Last updated: [DATE] Threat tier: Direct / Emerging / Declining / Adjacent
Their Pitch
"[Their tagline or core value prop — pulled from their homepage]"
What they lead with: [Speed / Price / Integrations / Enterprise / Ease of use] Their target buyer: [Title, company size, industry] Their proof: [Key customers, case studies, metrics they cite]
Our Counter-Pitch
"[Our response — what we do that they can't, in their language]"
Why we win:
- [Differentiator 1 — with proof point]
- [Differentiator 2 — with proof point]
- [Differentiator 3 — with proof point]
Their Weaknesses (sourced)
| Weakness | Evidence | Our Response |
| [e.g., Slow support] | "Support takes 3 days" — G2 review, 2026 | We offer same-day response (SLA in contract) |
| [e.g., No API] | GitHub: no public repos, pricing page silent on API | Full REST API, documented at [URL] |
| [e.g., Price jump at scale] | Pricing page: 10x cost from Starter to Growth] | Flat rate after [N] seats |
Objection Handling
"We already use [COMPETITOR]."
"Makes sense — they're solid for [X]. The question is whether [Y pain point] is costing you. [Client name] switched after [specific outcome]. Want to see how that looked?"
"[COMPETITOR] is cheaper."
"At [their entry price] vs ours, yes. But at [scale point], their pricing jumps to [amount]. We've done the math for teams your size — want to see the comparison?"
"We're evaluating [COMPETITOR] too."
"Good — run them in parallel. Ask them about [specific weak point]. That's where we consistently win."
Watch List
Track these signals weekly for this competitor:
use research BIRD_SEARCH '{"query":"[COMPETITOR] OR @[TWITTER_HANDLE]","count":20}'
use search SEARCH '{"query":"[COMPETITOR] news this week","max_results":"5"}'
use research JINA_READ '{"url":"https://[DOMAIN]/changelog"}'Alert triggers:
- New funding round → expect aggressive pricing or hiring
- Major launch → check if it closes our feature gaps
- Key exec departure → potential instability, good time to approach their customers
- Negative press spike → opportunity to run comparison content
Monitoring Cadence
| Frequency | Action |
| Daily | BIRD_SEARCH for brand mentions, exec tweets from competitors |
| Weekly | Full Step 2 intel sweep, update battlecards, produce Section 6 report |
| Monthly | Re-score matrix (Step 3), re-tier threats (Step 4) |
| Quarterly | Full JINA_READ of homepage + pricing + changelog for all competitors |
| On trigger | Breaking news, funding, major launch, exec hire/departure |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

