agentleFS
OpenLaborOpenLabor/openlabor/skills/cialdini-persuasion-science/SKILL.md

Robert Cialdini - Persuasion Science

Skill5 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Robert Cialdini's 7 principles of persuasion with practical business applications: reciprocity, scarcity, authority, social proof, commitment & consistency, liking, and unity — from Influence (1984) and Pre-Suasion (2016)

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Never: "Only 3 left!" when you have unlimited inventory.

    line 69
  2. Distinctive:

    The mechanism: When uncertain, people look to behavior of similar others.

    line 102
  3. Distinctive:

    Warning — Negative social proof: Never say "Most people don't do X" — it normalizes bad behavior.

    line 121
  4. Distinctive:

    Physical attractiveness: Use high-quality photos of real, attractive people

    line 163
  5. Distinctive:

    Mirror customer language: Use the words they use, reference the problems they describe, reflect their worldview.

    line 175
  6. Distinctive:

    Target: All 7 principles present, average score 4+.

    line 226

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Robert Cialdini - Persuasion Science

Apply Cialdini's 7 scientifically validated principles of influence whenever writing copy, designing pages, crafting emails, building pitches, or creating any asset where someone needs to say yes. Each principle exploits a genuine psychological tendency that evolved because it usually produces good decisions.

Routes when user asks about: persuasion, influence, why people say yes, sales psychology, marketing psychology, Cialdini, reciprocity, scarcity, social proof, authority, commitment, liking, unity, consent, ethical persuasion, conversion


How to Use This Skill

When creating or reviewing any persuasive asset (landing page, email, pitch, sales script, ad copy), apply the 7 principles below as a checklist. Score the asset against each principle, identify gaps, and strengthen the weakest ones. Always apply Pre-Suasion — establish the right frame before the main message.


Principle 1: Reciprocity

The mechanism: Humans feel obligated to return favors, gifts, and concessions. Gift → obligation to reciprocate. Concession → obligation to concede in return. Value given → goodwill and openness.

How to Apply

Content marketing as reciprocity: Publish genuinely useful content — frameworks, templates, tools — before asking for anything. Free resources that require no email are more powerful reciprocity triggers than gated content (though gated content works for lead generation).

The Free Sample: Free trials, free consultations, free audits. The miniature gift creates felt obligation to purchase.

First-Give Negotiation: In negotiations, make a concession early. The other party will feel compelled to match, often with a larger concession.

Surprise Gifts: Unexpected gifts are more powerful than expected ones. Handwritten notes, unexpected upgrades, bonus content — stronger obligation than anticipated value.

Checklist

  • What value are we giving before asking for anything?
  • Is the free value genuinely useful, or just a teaser?
  • Is the first move ours? (whoever gives first has leverage)
  • Is the gift personalized or personalization-adjacent? (personalized > generic)

Principle 2: Scarcity

The mechanism: People assign more value to opportunities that are rare or decreasing in availability. Loss aversion amplifies this — we fear losing access more than we desire gaining it.

Two Types of Scarcity

Quantity scarcity: "Only 12 remaining" — often works better because it implies social proof (others are buying). Time scarcity: "Offer expires Friday" — hard deadlines with legitimate reasons outperform soft deadlines.

How to Apply

Limited editions: Genuine limited editions create collector value and justify premium pricing. Works for physical products, digital cohorts/batches, and limited client slots.

Waitlists: Admitting demand exceeds supply paradoxically increases demand. Notion, Clubhouse, and Superhuman built buzz through waitlists.

Early access pricing: Combines scarcity (limited slots), reciprocity (they get a deal), and commitment (they bought early = invested).

Ethics Checkpoint — Only Use Genuine Scarcity

  • Genuine quantity limits (you actually have X units/slots)
  • Real time limits (the cohort genuinely starts on this date)
  • Honest capacity constraints (you genuinely can only serve N clients)

Never: "Only 3 left!" when you have unlimited inventory. Works once, destroys long-term credibility.


Principle 3: Authority

The mechanism: People defer to credible experts. We respond to signals of authority even when underlying expertise is absent.

Signals of Authority (ranked by strength)

  1. Demonstrated expertise (specific results, methodology, track record)
  2. Third-party credentials (publications, awards, media features)
  3. Titles and affiliations
  4. Professional appearance and presentation
  5. Confident, specific language

How to Apply

Demonstrated > claimed expertise: "We increased Acme Corp's conversion by 34% using this exact framework" > "We're conversion experts."

Specificity signals expertise: "Average client increases retention by 23% in 90 days" > "We improve retention." Vague claims signal low confidence; specific claims signal deep knowledge.

Pre-Suasion: Establish authority before the ask. Share a relevant credential, insight, or result before presenting the offer.

Checklist

  • Do we lead with credentials or results? (results are stronger)
  • Are authority signals specific (numbers, names, publications) or generic ("industry leader")?
  • Is expertise established before key conversion moments?
  • Are authority claims third-party verified, not self-reported?

Principle 4: Social Proof

The mechanism: When uncertain, people look to behavior of similar others. "If everyone is doing X, X is probably right."

Social Proof Types (ranked by persuasive power)

  1. Peers/Similar Others: "People like you are already doing X" — most powerful
  2. Celebrities/Influencers: Medium power, declining trust
  3. Expert endorsement: High power for credibility-sensitive decisions
  4. Crowd proof: Raw numbers — "10,000 customers"
  5. Certification/Awards: Third-party validation

How to Apply

Peer social proof: "Founders at Series A companies use this" > "12,000 businesses use this." Specificity about who uses it beats raw numbers.

Real-time proof: "14 people viewing this page right now" — triggers bandwagon + scarcity simultaneously.

Usage data as proof: "Teams average 4.2 hours saved per week" shows adoption and results in one claim.

Case studies: Feature a customer the prospect identifies with. Not your biggest logo — your most similar customer.

Warning — Negative social proof: Never say "Most people don't do X" — it normalizes bad behavior.

Strength Scoring (for each testimonial/proof element)

DimensionWeak (1)Strong (5)
Similarity to prospectGeneric "business owner"Specific "Series A SaaS founder"
Specificity of result"Really helped us""Increased ARR by $2.3M in 6 months"
Credibility of sourceAnonymousNamed person, company, photo

Maximum score: 15. Below 9: rewrite or replace.


Principle 5: Commitment and Consistency

The mechanism: Once people commit to a position, identity, or action, they act consistently with it. Small commitments lead to larger ones.

How to Apply

Foot-in-the-Door: Get small yeses before large ones. Newsletter → lead magnet → webinar → free trial → paid plan.

Public > Private commitments: Asking someone to share their goal publicly increases follow-through.

Written commitments: Writing increases commitment strength. Onboarding flows that ask "What's your goal?" create commitment the user will feel compelled to fulfill.

Active > Passive: Active choices ("I choose A") create stronger commitment than passive defaults.

The Identity Shift — Most powerful form: tie commitment to identity:

  • "You're the kind of person who..."
  • "Our most successful customers are those who..."
  • "You've shown you're serious about X by..."

Label customers with positive identities consistent with your product's benefits.


Principle 6: Liking

The mechanism: We comply with and buy from people we like. Dramatically underweighted in business contexts.

The 5 Liking Factors

  1. Physical attractiveness: Use high-quality photos of real, attractive people
  2. Similarity: "We're a team of founders who got frustrated by X" > generic corporate voice
  3. Familiarity: Mere exposure effect — consistent brand presence
  4. Compliments: Genuine compliments increase liking; hollow flattery doesn't
  5. Association: Alignment with people/things the audience already likes

How to Apply

Brand voice: Brands with distinct, likable personalities outperform generic ones. This is liking at scale.

Founder-led marketing: A real person with real opinions is more likable than a faceless brand. Authentic failures are more likable than polished successes.

Mirror customer language: Use the words they use, reference the problems they describe, reflect their worldview.


Principle 7: Unity

The mechanism: We are influenced by those who are part of our "we" — tribe, family, community. Goes beyond liking to shared identity.

Unity vs. Liking: Liking = "You're similar to me." Unity = "You are one of us."

How to Apply

Community building: Users who feel part of a community (not just a user base) have dramatically higher retention. The "we" identity makes leaving feel like abandoning the tribe.

Shared struggle: "We built this because we suffered through the same problem" creates unity. Shared struggle binds more strongly than shared success.

Co-creation: Involving customers in product decisions creates invested advocates. Advisory boards, beta groups, design partners.

Insider language: Communities develop their own vocabulary. Adopt and amplify it.


The Pre-Suasion Framework

From Pre-Suasion (2016): the moment before the request is as important as the request itself. Priming the right mental state doubles effectiveness.

Attention directs focus: What people attend to first shapes how they process everything after. Start with the customer's most acute pain.

Unity before ask: Establish shared identity before making a request. "As someone who cares about X..."

Credibility before content: State most relevant credential in the first sentence.

Positive framing: "Are you an adventurous person?" before an adventurous ask — they'll act consistently with "yes."


The Persuasion Audit

Score any marketing asset (page, email, sales script, pitch deck) on all 7 principles:

PrinciplePresent?Strength (1-5)Improvement
Reciprocity
Scarcity
Authority
Social Proof
Commitment
Liking
Unity

Minimum viable: Score 3+ on Social Proof, Authority, and Liking for any marketing asset. Target: All 7 principles present, average score 4+.


Sources

  • Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion — Robert Cialdini (1984, revised 2021)
  • Pre-Suasion: A Revolutionary Way to Influence and Persuade — Robert Cialdini (2016)
  • Influence at Work — Cialdini Group training materials
  • Freedman & Fraser (1966), "Compliance without pressure: the foot-in-the-door technique"

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.