specify
Skill0 starsChanged 27 days agoMITView on GitHub
Etapa 1 do Fluxo Smart — analisa a descricao do usuario e gera documentacao de especificacao de negocio para validacao
29 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- joeldevz/skynex-pitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Buddhilive/buddhi-clitheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarmtheir own version, first seen Oct 30, 2026
- jantichy/claudetheir own version, first seen Oct 27, 2026
- totalfrank/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 27, 2026
- danielcherubini/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use discover, spec-review and 7 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
anombyte93Skilldiscover
Phase 1 of the prd-taskmaster pipeline: brainstorm-driven discovery. Delegates to superpowers:brainstorming in Interactive Mode (one adaptive question at a time), or self-brainstorms in Autonomous Mode when no user is present. Intercepts before the brainstorming chain hands off to writing-plans — this skill owns the exit. Extracts constraints, calibrates scale (Solo / Team / Enterprise), and advances the pipeline to GENERATE.
Also in 4 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillspec-review
Independent, multi-model review of a design or spec **before** any code is written, for the microsoft/winappcli repo. Activate when a contributor asks to "review this spec", "review my design", "review this design doc", "validate this approach", "should we build this", "spec review", "design review", or "feature review". Fans out parallel sub-agents — each doing its OWN research against the real codebase and ecosystem rather than trusting the spec — covering necessity & scope, approach & alternatives, feasibility vs reality, risks & unknowns, DX & user impact, and a different-model-family cross-check. Emits a decision-oriented recommendation (proceed / proceed-with-changes / reconsider) to stdout. This is the PRE-CODE companion to the pr-review skill (which reviews code already written); use spec-review at the design/spec stage, not on an implemented diff. Does NOT write code or edit the spec.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillinit
Also in 5 projects that use this
MetaSkillroadmap
Build, continue, inspect, or visualize a source-grounded mathematical roadmap and theorem DAG in an existing Autoform Markdown blueprint. Use for source research, repository-wide inventories of existing and planned mathematics, scope, coverage, milestones, and roadmap articles; do not create repository infrastructure or prove Lean declarations.
Also in 3 projects that use this
sahinSkillexecute
Also in 3 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkillvalidate
Run the full CI validation workflow locally before submitting a PR. Use this as a final check to ensure all Azure DevOps CI pipeline steps will pass.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions29 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 29
- zaxbysauce/opencode-swarm★ 519same name
- ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm★ 518same name
- genkovich/sdd★ 187same name
- team-attention/hoyeon★ 173same name
- ArvorCo/Relentless★ 98same name
- jantichy/claude★ 45same name
- mehrad-dm/mastermind★ 23same name
- agent-ix/quoin★ 20same name
- danielcherubini/skills★ 14same name
- stormlightlabs/thunderus★ 4same name
19 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository28 other files it gives its agents.
- ado-closeSkill
- ado-commentSkill
- ado-getSkill
- ado-refineSkill
- adrSkill
- approve-reviewSkill
- appSkill
- autoSkill
- challenge-specSkill
- completeSkill
- dart-clean-archSkill
- discoverySkill
- fixSkill
- flutter-clean-archSkill
- implementSkill
- jira-refineSkill
- kickoffSkill
- linear-refineSkill
- orcamentoSkill
- planSkill
- post-reviewSkill
- pr-openSkill
- pr-statusSkill
- refineSkill
- reviewSkill
- statusSkill
- tasksSkill
- verifySkill
The file
Files
1. Detectar projeto
PROJECT_PATH=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)
source ~/.claude/bin/get-project.sh
PROJECT_NAME=$(get-project-name)
WF_DIR="$HOME/.claude/workflow/$PROJECT_NAME"Diretorio de workflow: ~/.claude/workflow/$PROJECT_NAME/
2. Verificar estado do fluxo
Caso A — spec.md ja existe (fluxo em andamento):
Pare e pergunte: "Ja existe um fluxo em andamento em PROJECT_NAME. Continuar (/status) ou Resetar?"
- Continuar → encerre, sugira
/status - Resetar → só depois do OK do usuário: rode
python3 ~/.claude/bin/wf-report.py reset --workflow-dir "$WF_DIR" || true(precisa docurrent.jsonainda existente), depois deletespec.md,plan.md,tasks.md,current.jsone prossiga
Caso B — phases.md existe mas spec.md nao (continuacao de phases):
Leia ~/.claude/workflow/$PROJECT_NAME/phases.md, encontre a primeira phase com [ ] e prossiga gerando spec para ela.
Avise: "Continuando com Phase N: <nome> do escopo dividido."
Caso C — nada existe: prossiga normalmente.
3. Capturar metricas de inicio — EXECUTE AGORA
bash ~/.claude/bin/capture-metrics.sh start specify "$PROJECT_NAME" "$PROJECT_PATH"Guarde o output como STEP_START_TS.
4. Reconhecimento do codebase
Antes de gerar a spec, entenda o ponto de partida:
- Ler convencoes do projeto: verifique se existe
CLAUDE.mdna raiz do projeto eDESIGN.md. Se existirem, leia-os para entender padroes e restricoes. Mapa da org: se existir.map/index.mdno repo ou numa pasta acima (nunca procure abaixo), leia o índice e as notas/gerados relevantes antes de grep/Explore. Nota marcada STALE não é confiável: confira as âncoras. O mapa descreveorigin/development; confira o diff da branch por cima. - Estrutura relevante: faca um
lsdos diretorios mais provaveis de serem impactados pela feature descrita pelo usuario. Entenda o que ja existe. - Estado atual: se a feature envolve modificar algo existente, leia o codigo atual para entender o ponto de partida. Se e nova, identifique onde ela se encaixaria na arquitetura.
O objetivo NAO e planejar a implementacao (isso e do
/plan), mas sim garantir que a spec reflete a realidade do projeto — nao uma abstracao desconectada.
5. Avaliar escopo — QUEBRAR EM PHASES SE NECESSARIO
Aplique os criterios:
Quebrar em phases se qualquer um for verdadeiro:
- Envolve 3+ dominios tecnicos distintos (ex: backend + frontend + infra + banco + seguranca)
- Estimativa de mais de 10 tasks
- Contem multiplas features independentes que poderiam ser entregues separadamente
- Ha dependencias sequenciais claras que dividem naturalmente o trabalho
Se decidir quebrar:
- Avise: "O escopo e grande. Vou dividi-lo em phases para garantir documentacao completa e implementacao assertiva."
- Mostre o plano de phases proposto e aguarde confirmacao do usuario
- Apos confirmacao, crie
~/.claude/workflow/$PROJECT_NAME/phases.md:
# Phases: <Nome do Projeto/Feature>
- [ ] Phase 1: <nome> — <1 linha descrevendo o que entra>
- [ ] Phase 2: <nome> — <1 linha descrevendo o que entra>
- [ ] Phase 3: <nome> — <1 linha descrevendo o que entra>- Informe: "Gerando spec completa para Phase 1:
<nome>. As demais serao feitas em ciclos subsequentes." - Gere a spec apenas para a Phase 1
Se nao precisar quebrar: gere a spec normalmente.
6. Gerar especificacao
Gere a spec para o escopo atual (feature inteira ou phase atual).
Documentacao deve ser COMPLETA e ASSERTIVA — nao superficial. Use bullets concisos mas cubra todos os detalhes relevantes. Max 7 bullets por secao se necessario.
Salve em ~/.claude/workflow/$PROJECT_NAME/spec.md:
# Spec: <Nome da Feature> [Phase N: <nome> se aplicavel]
## Estado atual
- <o que ja existe no codebase relevante a feature>
- <componentes, telas, modulos que serao tocados ou reutilizados>
- <ou "Greenfield — nada existe ainda">
## Contexto
- <bullet com contexto real e relevante>
## Objetivo
- <bullet>
## Regras de negocio
- <bullet por regra identificada>
## Pontos de atencao
- <riscos, dependencias, restricoes reais>
## Criterios de aceite
- [ ] <criterio verificavel e especifico>
## Fora do escopo
- <o que NAO sera feito — importante para delimitar>7. Capturar metricas finais — EXECUTE AGORA (obrigatorio)
bash ~/.claude/bin/capture-metrics.sh end specify "$PROJECT_NAME" "$PROJECT_PATH"8. Salvar current.json
Crie ~/.claude/workflow/$PROJECT_NAME/current.json (o script de metricas ja criou/atualizou as phases, mas o arquivo pode nao existir ainda no specify). Se o arquivo nao existir, crie-o:
{
"feature": "<nome 2-4 palavras, inclua 'Phase N' se aplicavel>",
"project": "<PROJECT_NAME>",
"project_path": "<PROJECT_PATH>",
"start_date": "<STEP_START_TS>",
"end_date": null,
"status": "specifying",
"tokens_used": 0,
"blockers": [],
"tags": [],
"phases": {},
"tasks": {
"total": 0,
"completed": 0,
"current_task_id": null,
"items": []
},
"backtracks": []
}Nota:
tokens_usede_sessionssao gerenciados exclusivamente pelotrack-tokens.py(Stop hook). Nunca escreva esses campos manualmente.
Depois rode o script de metricas end novamente se o current.json nao existia antes (para popular a fase specify).
Relatório: início da etapa (só aqui o current.json já existe).
python3 ~/.claude/bin/wf-report.py stage-start specify --workflow-dir "$WF_DIR" ${CLAUDE_FLOW_SESSION_ID:+--session "$CLAUDE_FLOW_SESSION_ID"} || trueSe dividiu o escopo em phases, registre a divisão. Registre como decisão do orquestrador (best-effort): escreva o texto com Write em $WF_DIR/.decision.md e rode (acrescente --mistake se for um erro seu):
python3 ~/.claude/bin/wf-report.py decision specify --workflow-dir "$WF_DIR" --by orchestrator --text-file "$WF_DIR/.decision.md" || true9. Verificar piloto automatico e finalizar
Relatório: fim da etapa. Escreva com Write um resumo de 3 a 10 linhas em $WF_DIR/.stage-summary.md (nunca interpole texto em shell) e rode:
python3 ~/.claude/bin/wf-report.py stage-end specify --workflow-dir "$WF_DIR" --summary-file "$WF_DIR/.stage-summary.md" || truetest -f ~/.claude/workflow/auto_mode.flag && echo "AUTO_ON" || echo "AUTO_OFF"Com auto on ou off, apresente o resumo da spec em 3-5 linhas e execute /challenge-spec sem perguntar. A aprovação da spec é o gate spec no fim do /challenge-spec, nunca aqui.
Nota: o
/challenge-specsetastatuspara"spec_approved"ao aprovar o gate; se o usuário pular o desafio e executar/plan, o/planseta antes de iniciar.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

