approve-review
Skill0 starsChanged 28 days agoMITView on GitHub
Fluxo Review etapa 2 — gate local. Marca um review draft como aprovado e pronto para publicar via /post-review. NAO aprova o PR no GitHub.
In this repository28 other files it gives its agents.
- ado-closeSkill
- ado-commentSkill
- ado-getSkill
- ado-refineSkill
- adrSkill
- appSkill
- autoSkill
- challenge-specSkill
- completeSkill
- dart-clean-archSkill
- discoverySkill
- fixSkill
- flutter-clean-archSkill
- implementSkill
- jira-refineSkill
- kickoffSkill
- linear-refineSkill
- orcamentoSkill
- planSkill
- post-reviewSkill
- pr-openSkill
- pr-statusSkill
- refineSkill
- reviewSkill
- specifySkill
- statusSkill
- tasksSkill
- verifySkill
The file
Files
1. Detectar projeto e PR
PROJECT_PATH=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)
source ~/.claude/bin/get-project.sh
PROJECT_NAME=$(get-project-name)
REVIEWS_DIR="$HOME/.claude/workflow/$PROJECT_NAME/reviews"Se o usuario passou um numero de PR como argumento, use-o como PR_NUM.
Se nao passou, liste reviews drafts disponiveis:
ls "$REVIEWS_DIR"/PR-*.md 2>/dev/nullPergunte qual aprovar, ou se ha apenas um, use-o.
2. Validar review
Leia $REVIEWS_DIR/PR-${PR_NUM}.md. Verifique:
- Frontmatter existe e tem
status: draft. Se ja forapproved, avise: "Este review ja foi aprovado. Para republicar, use/post-review <PR_NUM>." - Existe
$REVIEWS_DIR/PR-${PR_NUM}.comments.jsoncom comentarios validos. - O JSON tem schema correto: cada item com
path,line,body,severity.
Se algo estiver errado, liste o problema e pare.
3. Sincronizar edicoes manuais (opcional)
Se o usuario editou o PR-${PR_NUM}.md (adicionou/removeu/alterou comentarios), o comments.json pode estar desatualizado.
Pergunte: "O PR-${PR_NUM}.md pode ter sido editado manualmente. Quer que eu re-sincronize o comments.json a partir do markdown? (recomendado se voce editou)"
Se sim:
- Parse o markdown extraindo cada bloco
### \<path>`→#### Linha N —<sev>[<agent>]` → corpo - Re-gere o
PR-${PR_NUM}.comments.jsona partir disso - Confirme: "Re-sincronizado: N comentarios."
Se nao, mantenha o .comments.json original.
4. Marcar como aprovado
Atualize o frontmatter de PR-${PR_NUM}.md:
status: approved- Adicione
approved_at: <ISO timestamp>
5. Finalizar
Apresente:
- Total de comentarios que serao publicados
- Veredicto que sera enviado (do campo "Veredicto sugerido" do markdown)
- Caminho do arquivo
Mensagem final: "Review aprovado localmente. Para publicar no PR: /post-review <PR_NUM>."
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

