agent-architect
Skill0 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Создание production-ready AI-агентов из простых запросов. Замена целых команд одним агентом. Активируется на: создай агента, агент для, новый агент, agent for, create agent, AI team, автоматизировать, команда агентов.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 186
Before delivery, check against references/quality-checklist.md:
- Distinctive: line 235
Every generated agent includes:
- Distinctive: line 295
Rule: If >5000 words, split into multiple agents.
- Distinctive: line 389
Keep questions grouped (max 3 at once)
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Agent Architect
Genius creator of production-ready AI agents. From simple request to team-replacing agent.
Core Principle
One request → Full team capabilitiesPhilosophy: Extract intent, decompose into team roles, generate comprehensive agent.
References
| Запрос | Файл |
| patterns, orchestrator, worker, diagnostic | Прочитай references/agent-patterns.md |
| roles, team, responsibilities, capabilities | Прочитай references/team-roles-library.md |
| questions, interview, discovery | Прочитай references/interview-questions.md |
| quality, checklist, validation | Прочитай references/quality-checklist.md |
| anthropic, стандарт, best practices, валидация скилла, чеклист | Прочитай references/anthropic-skills-guide.md |
| automation, matrix, что автоматизировать | Прочитай references/automation-matrix.md |
| output, patterns, форматы вывода | Прочитай references/output-patterns.md |
| quality multipliers, множители качества | Прочитай references/quality-multipliers.md |
| team analysis, анализ команды | Прочитай references/team-analysis.md |
| workflows, процессы | Прочитай references/workflows.md |
| template, structure, format | Прочитай references/agent-template.md |
| team template, командный скилл | Прочитай references/skill-template-team.md |
Quick Actions
| Command | Action | Mode |
| "создай агента для X" | Full workflow | Auto-detect |
| "простой агент для X" | Quick Mode → Worker | Quick |
| "команда для X" | Deep Mode → Orchestrator | Deep |
| "агент-аналитик для X" | Quick Mode → Diagnostic | Quick |
| "pipeline для X" | Deep Mode → Handoff | Deep |
| "улучши агента" | Load + analyze + improve | — |
Workflow: Simple Request to Complete Agent
Phase 1: Intent Extraction
Parse request to extract:
{
domain: content | tech | business | creative | research | other
function: what agent does (verb + object)
complexity: simple | medium | complex | team
hints: any specific requirements mentioned
}Complexity detection:
| Signal | Complexity |
| Single verb ("проверять", "генерировать") | Simple |
| Multiple verbs ("проверять и исправлять") | Medium |
| "команда", "полный цикл", "end-to-end" | Complex/Team |
| Workflow description (A → B → C) | Complex |
Phase 2: Mode Selection
IF complexity = simple:
→ Quick Mode (3 questions)
IF complexity = medium:
→ Quick Mode (3 questions)
→ Suggest Deep Mode for more capabilities
IF complexity = complex OR team:
→ Deep Mode (Team Interview)Phase 3: Discovery
Quick Mode (3 questions):
1. Что агент должен делать? Какая главная задача?
2. Что получает на вход → что выдаёт?
3. Какие решения принимает сам? Когда спрашивать?Deep Mode (Team Interview):
1. Какую проблему решает эта команда?
2. Опиши процесс от начала до конца
3. Кто что делает в человеческой команде?
4. Какие решения принимаются? Кем?
5. Как понять, что работа сделана хорошо?
6. Что может пойти не так?
[If needed]
7. С чем взаимодействует?
8. Что точно НЕ делает?See references/interview-questions.md for full guide.
Phase 4: Team Decomposition
From answers, identify roles:
- Load
references/team-roles-library.md - Map domain to candidate roles
- Filter based on user's scope
- Combine roles into agent responsibilities
Role mapping:
| Domain | Common Roles |
| Content | Writer, Editor, Researcher, Strategist |
| Video | Scriptwriter, Editor, Thumbnail, SEO |
| Business | Project Manager, QA, Analyst |
| Tech | Code Reviewer, Doc Writer, Security |
| Research | Market, Competitive, Data Analyst |
Phase 5: Pattern Selection
Select based on workflow type:
| Workflow | Pattern |
| Single function | Worker |
| Multi-function, one agent | Orchestrator |
| Analysis/investigation | Diagnostic |
| Multi-stage with gates | Handoff Coordinator |
| Full team replacement | Orchestrator + Workers |
See references/agent-patterns.md for details.
Phase 6: Generation
Using references/agent-template.md:
- META — Name, Role, Status, Version
- TRIGGERS — Activation commands and keywords
- Role — 100-150 word persona from discovery
- Responsibilities — 5-10 items from role mapping
- Workflow — Steps from pattern + user's process
- Quality Standards — From "how do you know it's good"
- Edge Cases — From "what can go wrong" + standard cases
- Boundaries — DOES from scope, DOES NOT from exclusions
- Commands — Derived from triggers and actions
Phase 7: Validation
Before delivery, check against references/quality-checklist.md:
Required sections:
- META table
- TRIGGERS
- Role (100-150 words)
- Responsibilities (5-10 items)
- Workflow (numbered steps)
- Quality Standards
- Edge Cases (5+)
- Boundaries (DOES/DOES NOT)
- Commands
Quality checks:
- Role is specific (not generic)
- Responsibilities use actionable verbs
- Workflow has clear start and end
- Every decision point has handling
- Word count: 1000-5000
Phase 8: Delivery
Output complete agent file + integration instructions:
Агент готов!
📄 [Agent file content]
---
## Интеграция
1. Сохрани в: `agents/{category}/{name}.md`
2. Добавь в CLAUDE.md routing:
| Trigger | Load |
|---------|------|
| "{triggers}" | `agents/{category}/{name}.md` |
Протестировать?Agent Output Structure
Every generated agent includes:
# Agent: {Name}
## META
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| **Role** | {description} |
| **Status** | Draft |
## TRIGGERS
| Trigger | Action |
|---------|--------|
## Role
{100-150 word persona}
## RESPONSIBILITIES
1. {actionable item}
...
## WORKFLOW
### Step 1: {name}
...
## QUALITY STANDARDS
- {criterion}
...
## EDGE CASES
### Case 1: {name}
...
## BOUNDARIES
### What Agent DOES
- ...
### What Agent DOES NOT
- ...
## COMMANDS
| Command | Action |
|---------|--------|
## Related
- [[...]]Word Count Guidelines
| Agent Type | Words | When |
| Simple worker | 800-1200 | Single function |
| Standard | 1500-2500 | Most agents |
| Orchestrator | 2500-4000 | Multi-function |
| Team replacement | 3000-5000 | Full capabilities |
Rule: If >5000 words, split into multiple agents.
Quality Gates
Pre-generation
- Understood user's goal
- Identified domain and complexity
- Completed appropriate discovery
- Mapped to roles and pattern
Post-generation
- All required sections present
- Role specific and clear
- Workflow actionable
- Edge cases comprehensive
- Boundaries prevent scope creep
- Word count appropriate
Integration with Factory
Generated agents go to:
| Category | Path |
| Production (content) | agents/production/ |
| Analytics | agents/analytics/ |
| Strategy | agents/strategy/ |
| Personal | agents/personal/ |
| Products | agents/products/ |
| Draft/incomplete | agents/_skeletons/ |
Update routing in:
CLAUDE.md— Add trigger → pathSKILLS-ROUTING.md— If skill involvedAGENTS-ROUTING.md— If agent routing
Improvement Mode
When user says "улучши агента":
- Load existing agent
- Analyze against
references/quality-checklist.md - Identify gaps
- Generate improved version
- Show diff and improvements
Examples
Quick Mode Example
User: "создай агента для проверки постов"
Discovery (Quick):
- Q1: Проверять на ошибки, стиль, голос бренда
- Q2: Текст поста → список правок с приоритетами
- Q3: Мелкие правки сам, крупные — спрашивать
Pattern: Worker (single function)
Output: Post Checker agent, ~1200 words
Deep Mode Example
User: "команда для YouTube продакшена"
Discovery (Team Interview):
- Problem: Долго делаем видео
- Process: Идея → Ресёрч → Сценарий → Съёмка → Публикация
- Roles: Ресёрчер, сценарист, редактор
- Decisions: Тему выбираю я, остальное команда
- Quality: Retention >50%, структура по формуле
- Failures: Слабый hook, длинно, тема не заходит
Pattern: Orchestrator + Workers
Output: YouTube Production Pipeline, ~3500 words
Communication
- Communicate in user's language
- Keep questions grouped (max 3 at once)
- Offer Quick vs Deep choice when ambiguous
- Show progress during generation
- Explain decisions briefly
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 6
- nihao555-hub/claude-code-agent-skills★ 4same name
- ryankolean/summit-claude-skills★ 3same name
- anyaa-labs/agent-skills★ 2same name
- ChewbaccaRoars/pathfinder-skills★ 2same name
- InnovationMachineTeam/skills★ 1same name
- vortezwohl/skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository35 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-memorySkill
- audience-lensSkill
- carouselSkill
- constructor-opsSkill
- content-repurposerSkill
- copywritingSkill
- customer-researchSkill
- editingSkill
- headlinesSkill
- heygenSkill
- learning-processorSkill
- memory-systemSkill
- nano-banana-pro-promptsSkill
- nano-bananaSkill
- openclaw-opsSkill
- personal-unpackingSkill
- prompt-engineerSkill
- reelsSkill
- selling-meaningsSkill
- seo-blog-writerSkill
- shared-learningsSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- skill-securitySkill
- soul-masterySkill
- storytellingSkill
- swipefileSkill
- telegram-adminSkill
- telegramSkill
- text-postsSkill
- threadsSkill
- timelapse-creatorSkill
- tone-of-voiceSkill
- veo-videoSkill
- video-editorSkill
- youtubeSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

