security-review
Skill5 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Run a security review against code changes or files. Covers OWASP Top 10: secrets management, input validation, SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, auth/authz, rate limiting, and sensitive data exposure. Use when adding auth, handling user input, creating API endpoints, working with secrets, implementing payments, or integrating third-party APIs. Triggers: 'security review', 'check for vulnerabilities', 'audit this endpoint', 'is this safe'. Do NOT use for general code review, performance optimization, or UI/UX feedback.
- Reads credentials
192 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- AOSSIE-Org/Resonate-Websitetheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- dimastriann/odoo-erp-mcptheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ksprashu/agent-skill-forgetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- enes-alatas/spooltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- sgaabdu4/appwrite-backendtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- AndersonAndrad/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use linkerd-patterns, dependency-cve-sweep and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
xfstudioSkilllinkerd-patterns
Implement Linkerd service mesh patterns for lightweight, security-focused service mesh deployments. Use when setting up Linkerd, configuring traffic policies, or implementing zero-trust networking with minimal overhead.
Also in 5 projects that use this
berntpoppSkilldependency-cve-sweep
Use when handling Dependabot PRs, CodeQL/Trivy alerts, or doing a routine dependency/CVE sweep for this repo.
Also in 12 projects that use this
berntpoppSkillfleet-standard-adoption
Use when bringing this repo into compliance with a GeneFoundry fleet standard (tool-naming, response-envelope, container-hardening, versioning, MCP transport, or logging) or closing its tracking issue.
Also in 12 projects that use this
HABUBUSSSkillproject-guidelines-example
Also in 16 projects that use this
niloykumarbarmanSkillagent-sort
Build an evidence-backed ECC install plan for a specific repo by sorting skills, commands, rules, hooks, and extras into DAILY vs LIBRARY buckets using parallel repo-aware review passes. Use when ECC should be trimmed to what a project actually needs instead of loading the full bundle.
Also in 13 projects that use this
royaluniondesign-sysSkillconfigure-ecc
Interactive installer for Everything Claude Code — guides users through selecting and installing skills and rules to user-level or project-level directories, verifies paths, and optionally optimizes installed files.
Also in 11 projects that use this
- +2 more from berntpopp
Other versions192 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 192
- affaan-m/ECC★ 246ksame name
- github/awesome-copilot★ 41ksame name
- langfuse/langfuse★ 37ksame name
- nearai/ironclaw★ 13ksame name
- joe-bell/cva★ 6.9ksame name
- doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper★ 5.5ksame name
- github/squad★ 3.4ksame name
- compozy/compozy★ 2.9ksame name
- getsentry/sentry-python★ 2.2ksame name
- trycompai/comp★ 2.1ksame name
182 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository25 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- adk-engineerSkill
- agent-orchestratorSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- bugfixSkill
- classify-reviewSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- codex-reviewSkill
- context7-skillsSkill
- developer-growth-analysisSkill
- file-organizerSkill
- gcp-deploy-guardianSkill
- gws-workspaceSkill
- handoverSkill
- modern-architectureSkill
- planSkill
- repo-cleanSkill
- review-loopSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- supabase-nextjs-debuggerSkill
- tdd-workflowSkill
- test-falsifySkill
- ui-design-systemSkill
- ui-skillsSkill
- ux-researcher-designerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 167 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 57
If a finding has no clear fix (e.g., third-party library vulnerability with no patch), report it with severity and recommend mitigation …
- Distinctive: line 58
If the codebase uses patterns not covered here, flag them as "NEEDS MANUAL REVIEW" with the reason.
- Distinctive: line 59
If no vulnerabilities are found, explicitly state "No issues found" with the scope of the review (files examined, checks performed).
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 167 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Security Review
Audit code for vulnerabilities. Report each finding with: location (file:line), severity (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW), description, and fix.
Review Order (by priority)
- Secrets -- No hardcoded keys, tokens, or passwords. All secrets in env vars.
.env*in.gitignore. - Input validation -- All user input validated with Zod schemas. File uploads restricted (size, type, extension). No direct use of user input in queries.
- SQL injection -- All queries parameterized. No string concatenation in SQL.
- Auth/Authz -- Tokens in httpOnly cookies (not localStorage). Authorization checks before sensitive operations. RBAC enforced.
- XSS -- User HTML sanitized with DOMPurify. CSP headers configured. No unvalidated
dangerouslySetInnerHTML. - CSRF -- CSRF tokens on state-changing operations.
SameSite=Stricton cookies. - Rate limiting -- All API endpoints rate-limited. Stricter limits on expensive operations (search, AI generation).
- Data exposure -- No secrets in logs. Generic error messages for users. No stack traces exposed.
- Dependencies --
npm auditclean. Lock files committed.
Quick Checks
# Hardcoded secrets
grep -rn "sk-\|password\s*=\s*[\"']" --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx" src/
# Missing input validation
grep -rn "req\.body\|req\.query\|req\.params" --include="*.ts" src/app/api/ | grep -v "parse\|validate\|schema"
# SQL concatenation
grep -rn "SELECT.*\${\|INSERT.*\${\|UPDATE.*\${\|DELETE.*\${" --include="*.ts" src/
# localStorage tokens
grep -rn "localStorage.*token\|localStorage.*key" --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx" src/Pre-Deployment Checklist
- No hardcoded secrets
- All inputs validated
- All queries parameterized
- XSS: user content sanitized, CSP configured
- CSRF protection enabled
- Auth: httpOnly cookies, RBAC enforced
- Rate limiting on all endpoints
- HTTPS enforced
- Security headers set (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options)
- No sensitive data in logs or error responses
- Dependencies audited, lock files committed
- CORS properly configured
- File uploads validated
Error Handling
- If a finding has no clear fix (e.g., third-party library vulnerability with no patch), report it with severity and recommend mitigation (pin version, add wrapper, monitor advisory).
- If the codebase uses patterns not covered here, flag them as "NEEDS MANUAL REVIEW" with the reason.
- If no vulnerabilities are found, explicitly state "No issues found" with the scope of the review (files examined, checks performed).
References
See references/code-examples.md for detailed code patterns (secrets, validation, auth, XSS, CSRF, rate limiting, blockchain).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

