agentleFS
Cor-IncorporatedCor-Incorporated/claude-code-skills/skills/ux-researcher-designer/SKILL.md

ux-researcher-designer

Skill5 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

UX research and design toolkit: data-driven persona generation, journey mapping, usability testing frameworks, and research synthesis. Use when creating personas, mapping user journeys, planning usability tests, or synthesizing research findings. Triggers: 'create persona', 'map user journey', 'plan usability test', 'synthesize research'. Do NOT use for UI implementation, visual design, or coding tasks.

15 other projects use a version of this, 9 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use artifacts-builder.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Patrick-Git-CreatorSkill

    artifacts-builder

    Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Usability testing: Create test frameworks, define tasks, structure findings.

    line 15
  2. Distinctive:

    If input JSON is malformed, report the parse error with the expected schema.

    line 39
  3. Very specific:

    If sample size is below 5, warn that personas are speculative and flag confidence as very low.

    line 40
  4. Distinctive:

    If no interview data is provided, note that psychographic depth is limited to behavioral inference only.

    line 41

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

UX Researcher & Designer

Generate research-backed UX artifacts from user data.

Core Capabilities

  • Persona generation: Analyze behavior patterns, identify archetypes, extract psychographics, generate scenarios, score confidence by sample size.
  • Journey mapping: Map customer touchpoints, identify pain points, surface opportunities.
  • Usability testing: Create test frameworks, define tasks, structure findings.
  • Research synthesis: Aggregate insights across studies, prioritize by impact.

Persona Generator

Run: python scripts/persona_generator.py [json]

Input: JSON with user behavior data and interview transcripts. Output: Research-backed personas with design implications.

Required Input Fields

  • users: Array of user behavior records (sessions, actions, demographics).
  • interviews (optional): Array of interview transcript summaries.

Output Includes

  • Persona archetype with name, demographics, goals, frustrations.
  • Behavioral patterns and psychographic profile.
  • Usage scenarios with design implications.
  • Confidence score based on sample size (low < 10, medium 10-50, high > 50).

Error Handling

  • If input JSON is malformed, report the parse error with the expected schema.
  • If sample size is below 5, warn that personas are speculative and flag confidence as very low.
  • If no interview data is provided, note that psychographic depth is limited to behavioral inference only.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.