gsd-progress
Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Output language: Respond automatically in the user's conversation language. Detect where the project stands and suggest (or auto-execute) the next GSD command. Read memory/.planning/STATE.md and memory/.planning/ROADMAP.md. If either file is missing, stop and report: From STATE.md, extract: - Phase: the numeric or named phase (e.g., "0", "1", "Exploration") - Status: pending / discussed / planned / executed / verified / shipped If Status is not explicitly stated, infer from the content: - "Active Tasks: None yet." or no tasks marked…
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- sp1e/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 12, 2026
- open-gsd/get-shit-done-reduxtheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- adrianoanthonymma16-boop/opencode-agentstheir own version, first seen Sep 16, 2026
- open-gsd/gsd-coretheir own version, first seen Sep 2, 2026
- ZaneL1u/cloud-cli-proxytheir own version, first seen May 9, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use gsd-next and gsd-onboard.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
open-gsdSkillgsd-next
Smart entry — detect project state and route to the right next GSD action.
Also in 3 projects that use this
open-gsdSkillgsd-onboard
Guide existing codebase onboarding through mapping, doc ingest, and planning setup
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- open-gsd/get-shit-done-redux★ 11ksame name
- open-gsd/gsd-core★ 11ksame name
- ZaneL1u/cloud-cli-proxy★ 57same name
- adrianoanthonymma16-boop/opencode-agents★ 1same name
- sp1e/claude-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository56 other files it gives its agents.
- C31-1stSkill
- C31-adopt-projectSkill
- C31-brainstormSkill
- C31-coding-disciplineSkill
- C31-compound-refreshSkill
- C31-compoundSkill
- C31-context-engineeringSkill
- C31-curatorSkill
- c31-daily-intelSkill
- C31-debugSkill
- c31-devSkill
- C31-grillSkill
- C31-lfgSkill
- C31-planSkill
- C31-researchSkill
- C31-specSkill
- C31-stormSkill
- C31-strategySkill
- C31-workflow-bug-reproductionSkill
- C31-workSkill
- rl-workflowSkill
- C31-cvideoSkill
- c31-loopSkill
- c31-sxsSkill
- teachSkill
- video-content-analysisSkill
- agent-reachSkill
- kimiimSkill
- skillhub-preferenceSkill
- c31-communitySkill
- c31-growSkill
- c31-gutcheckSkill
- c31-marketSkill
- c31-mvpSkill
- c31-priceSkill
- c31-processSkill
- c31-sellSkill
- c31-validateSkill
- c31-valuesSkill
- growth-hackerSkill
- c31-improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- C31-multi-reviewSkill
- C31-review-adversarialSkill
- C31-review-architectureSkill
- C31-review-securitySkill
- C31-reviewSkill
- c31-wizardSkill
- external-privacy-guardSkill
- find-skillsSkill
- gsd-map-codebaseSkill
- gsd-new-projectSkill
- gsd-quickSkill
- gsd-shipSkill
- humanize-aiSkill
- time-awarenessSkill
- worker-safetySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 25
After completing a phase and the user needs direction
- Very specific: line 31
Read memory/.planning/STATE.md and memory/.planning/ROADMAP.md.
- Distinctive: line 33
If either file is missing, stop and report:
- Very specific: line 44
If Status is not explicitly stated, infer from the content:
- Very specific: line 66
Check for --auto flag in arguments, or if the user message contains "auto".
- Very specific: line 83
Never modify STATE.md or ROADMAP.md.
- Distinctive: line 84
If status cannot be inferred, report "Unable to determine status" and ask the user to clarify.
- Distinctive: line 85
Keep output concise; show only status and next step.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Multilingual Triggers
| Language | Trigger phrases |
| EN | progress, next step, what next, 下一步, 继续, gsd-progress, where are we |
| ZH | 下一步, 继续, 进度 |
| JA | 次のステップ, 進捗確認 |
Output language: Respond automatically in the user's conversation language.
gsd-progress — Next-Step Detector
Detect where the project stands and suggest (or auto-execute) the next GSD command.
When to Use
- User says "progress", "next step", "what next", "下一步", "继续", or runs
gsd-progress - After completing a phase and the user needs direction
Workflow
Step 1: Read Planning Files
Read memory/.planning/STATE.md and memory/.planning/ROADMAP.md.
If either file is missing, stop and report:
No active project found. Run `gsd-new-project` first to initialize planning artifacts.Step 2: Detect Current Phase
From STATE.md, extract:
Phase: the numeric or named phase (e.g., "0", "1", "Exploration")Status: pending / discussed / planned / executed / verified / shipped
If Status is not explicitly stated, infer from the content:
- "Active Tasks: None yet." or no tasks marked done → pending
- Tasks exist but no implementation details → discussed
- Plan or task list is present and not yet executed → planned
- Code has been written or files modified → executed
- Review or testing completed → verified
- Deployed or released → shipped
Step 3: Determine Next Command
| Status | Suggestion |
| No project (files missing) | gsd-new-project |
| pending | C31-brainstorm or gsd-discuss-phase |
| discussed | C31-plan or gsd-plan-phase |
| planned | C31-work or gsd-execute-phase |
| executed | C31-review or gsd-verify-work |
| verified | gsd-ship |
| shipped | "Project is shipped. Run gsd-new-project for a new project." |
Step 4: Suggest or Execute
Check for --auto flag in arguments, or if the user message contains "auto".
- Suggest mode (default): Print the detected status and recommended command.
📊 Current status: {phase_name} — {status} 👉 Next step: {command} - Auto mode (
--autoor "auto"): Execute the recommended command directly. Report before executing:📊 Auto-detected status: {phase_name} — {status} 🚀 Executing: {command}
Rules
- Never modify
STATE.mdorROADMAP.md. - If status cannot be inferred, report "Unable to determine status" and ask the user to clarify.
- Keep output concise; show only status and next step.
- Under 300 lines total.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

