brainstorming
Skill9 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when starting any feature, project, or design work. Guides collaborative design refinement through incremental questioning before any code is written.
190 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- DemonDamon/AgenticXtheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- roundpilot/superpowers-antigravitytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ainurdev/mystical-assistanttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- REPOZY/superpowers-optimizedtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lingyired/status-triotheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- alunadev/ald-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-code-review
中文代码审查规范——在保持专业严谨的同时,用符合国内团队文化的方式给出有效反馈
Also in 8 projects that use this
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-commit-conventions
中文 Git 提交规范 — 适配国内团队的 commit message 规范和 changelog 自动化
Also in 8 projects that use this
ryanportfolioSkilladdskill
Create, import, update, or install repo or personal skills: runtime ownership, resources, discovery checks.
Also in 6 projects that use this
ryanportfolioSkillapply-firmware
Bring current folder (plain folder, existing repo, old or partial firmware copy) up to full Harness Firmware in place. Mirror external repo → adopt-repo.
Also in 6 projects that use this
- +2 more from Leodorareluctant259
- +6 more from ryanportfolio
Other versions190 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 190
- obra/superpowers★ 314ksame name
- jnMetaCode/superpowers-zh★ 8.4ksame name
- vudovn/ag-kit★ 8.2ksame name
- vudovn/antigravity-kit★ 8.2ksame name
- JetBrains/thinkrail★ 7.9ksame name
- openai/plugins★ 7.8ksame name
- farm-fe/farm★ 5.6ksame name
- microsoft/FluidFramework★ 4.9ksame name
- BetterTyped/react-zoom-pan-pinch★ 1.9ksame name
- lingyired/status-trio★ 1.8ksame name
180 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository77 other files it gives its agents.
- building-mechanicsSkill
- algorithmic-artSkill
- audio-analysisSkill
- audio-playbackSkill
- audio-reactiveSkill
- audio-routerSkill
- aws-skillsSkill
- backend-dev-guidelinesSkill
- brand-guidelinesSkill
- builder-uxSkill
- building-routerSkill
- canvas-designSkill
- case-studies-referenceSkill
- component-librarySkill
- d3js-visualizationSkill
- dashboardSkill
- decay-upkeepSkill
- doc-coauthoringSkill
- docxSkill
- form-accessibilitySkill
- form-reactSkill
- form-securitySkill
- forms-routerSkill
- form-ux-patternsSkill
- form-validationSkill
- form-vanillaSkill
- form-vueSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- frontend-dev-guidelinesSkill
- gsap-fundamentalsSkill
- gsap-reactSkill
- gsap-routerSkill
- gsap-scrolltriggerSkill
- gsap-sequencingSkill
- immersive-visuals-routerSkill
- internal-commsSkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- multiplayer-buildingSkill
- particles-gpuSkill
- particles-lifecycleSkill
- particles-physicsSkill
- particles-routerSkill
- pdfSkill
- performance-at-scaleSkill
- platform-buildingSkill
- postfx-bloomSkill
- postfx-composerSkill
- postfx-effectsSkill
- postfx-routerSkill
- pptxSkill
- product-self-knowledgeSkill
- r3f-dreiSkill
- r3f-fundamentalsSkill
- r3f-geometrySkill
- r3f-materialsSkill
- r3f-performanceSkill
- r3f-routerSkill
- router-templateSkill
- scientific-documentationSkill
- shader-effectsSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
14 rules. 0 are common, 12 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 170 edited versions we read keep these.
12
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Don't jump into implementation.
- Distinctive: line 23
One question at a time: - Don't overwhelm with multiple questions.
- Distinctive: line 32
Always present 2-3 approaches before settling:
- Distinctive: line 70
Ask: "Do we need this for the MVP?"
- Distinctive: line 75
Instead of: "How should we handle errors?" Ask: "For error handling, should we: A) Return error codes, B) Throw exceptions, C) Use Result …
- Distinctive: line 76
Ask: "For error handling, should we: A) Return error codes, B) Throw exceptions, C) Use Result types?"
- Distinctive: line 79
Instead of: "What should the API look like?" Ask: "Should this be REST, GraphQL, or RPC?"
- Distinctive: line 80
Ask: "Should this be REST, GraphQL, or RPC?"
- Distinctive: line 126
After design is approved:
- Distinctive: line 127
Ask: "Ready to set up for implementation?"
- Very specific: line 128
Use using-git-worktrees skill to create isolated workspace
- Very specific: line 129
Use writing-plans skill to create detailed implementation plan
- Distinctive: line 134
Start coding before design is clear
- Distinctive: line 136
Ask open-ended questions when specific ones work
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 170 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Brainstorming
Core Principle
Design before code. Always.
Don't jump into implementation. Tease out the spec through conversation first.
The Brainstorming Process
Step 1: Understand the Goal
Ask clarifying questions:
- What problem are we solving?
- Who is the user?
- What does success look like?
- What are the constraints?
One question at a time - Don't overwhelm with multiple questions.
Step 2: Explore the Space
- What are the possible approaches?
- What are the trade-offs?
- What similar problems exist?
- What patterns apply?
Step 3: Propose Alternatives
Always present 2-3 approaches before settling:
## Option A: [Name]
- Pros: ...
- Cons: ...
- Best when: ...
## Option B: [Name]
- Pros: ...
- Cons: ...
- Best when: ...
## Option C: [Name]
- Pros: ...
- Cons: ...
- Best when: ...
**Recommendation:** Option [X] because...Step 4: Incremental Validation
Present design in digestible chunks:
- Show one section at a time
- Get sign-off before moving on
- Allow for course corrections
Step 5: Document the Design
Save to: docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md
YAGNI Ruthlessly
During brainstorming, actively remove:
- Features that "might be nice"
- Edge cases that "could happen"
- Abstractions for "future flexibility"
- Optimizations for "scale we might need"
Ask: "Do we need this for the MVP?"
Question Techniques
Multiple Choice Preferred
Instead of: "How should we handle errors?" Ask: "For error handling, should we: A) Return error codes, B) Throw exceptions, C) Use Result types?"
Constrained Questions
Instead of: "What should the API look like?" Ask: "Should this be REST, GraphQL, or RPC?"
Assumption Surfacing
- "I'm assuming X. Is that correct?"
- "This depends on Y. Is that available?"
- "The constraint seems to be Z. Agreed?"
Output: Design Document
# [Feature Name] Design
## Problem Statement
What problem are we solving?
## Goals
- Goal 1
- Goal 2
## Non-Goals
- Explicitly out of scope item 1
- Explicitly out of scope item 2
## Proposed Solution
Overview of the approach
## Alternatives Considered
Why we didn't choose other approaches
## Technical Design
### Component A
...
### Component B
...
## Open Questions
- Question 1
- Question 2
## Next Steps
1. Step 1
2. Step 2Transition to Implementation
After design is approved:
- Ask: "Ready to set up for implementation?"
- Use
using-git-worktreesskill to create isolated workspace - Use
writing-plansskill to create detailed implementation plan
Anti-Patterns
Don't Do This
- Start coding before design is clear
- Present only one option
- Ask open-ended questions when specific ones work
- Skip validation of each section
- Assume requirements are complete
- Over-engineer the initial design
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

