agentleFS
Bbeierle12Bbeierle12/Skill-MCP-Claude/skills/case-studies-reference/SKILL.md

case-studies-reference

Skill9 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Game building mechanics case studies and decision frameworks. Use when designing building systems, evaluating trade-offs, or learning from existing games. Reference-only skill with detailed analysis of Fortnite, Rust, Valheim, Minecraft, No Man's Sky, and Satisfactory building systems.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use case studies when making design decisions such as which physics model to implement, how to handle multiplayer building, choosing …

    line 23

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Case Studies Reference

Detailed analysis of building systems from successful games, plus decision frameworks for new projects.

Quick Reference

GameBuilding FocusPhysicsScaleKey Innovation
FortniteCombat/actionArcadeSmallEdit system, speed
RustSurvival/raidsHeuristicLargeTool Cupboard, decay
ValheimExplorationHeuristicMediumStability from ground
MinecraftCreativityNoneInfiniteVoxel simplicity
No Man's SkyBase buildingMinimalMediumSnap points, free place
SatisfactoryFactoryGrid-basedLargeHybrid grid/free

When to Use This Skill

Use case studies when making design decisions such as which physics model to implement, how to handle multiplayer building, choosing between grid and free placement, and deciding on decay/upkeep systems. The analyses provide concrete examples of trade-offs and their outcomes.

Reference Documents

See references/ for detailed documentation covering game-by-game breakdowns of building mechanics and performance strategies, decision matrices for common architectural choices, anti-patterns identified from games that struggled, and architectural recommendations organized by game genre.

Decision Framework

For quick decisions, use the matrices in game-analyses.md:

Physics Mode Selection: Are you building a survival game where building is about shelter? Use heuristic physics like Rust or Valheim. Is building core to moment-to-moment combat? Use arcade physics like Fortnite. Is engineering challenge the point? Consider realistic physics with caution since Medieval Engineers showed this approach frustrates most players.

Multiplayer Architecture: Competitive and PvP games require server-authoritative building with latency accepted as the cost of security. Cooperative games can use client prediction with server reconciliation for responsive feel. Single-player can use fully client-side for maximum responsiveness.

Persistence Strategy: Long-running servers need decay and cleanup. Rust's model combines gameplay balance through resource sinks with server health through automatic cleanup. Without decay, servers accumulate abandoned bases until performance degrades.

Key Insights Summary

Rust demonstrates that decay serves dual purposes: gameplay balance by forcing maintenance, and server health by cleaning abandoned structures. Valheim shows that "magic force from ground" stability is more intuitive than realistic physics. Fortnite proves that speed and simplicity trump realism for action games. Satisfactory's hybrid approach of grid for structures plus free placement for conveyors satisfies both organized and creative builders.

Related Skills

This reference skill pairs with implementation skills that provide working code for the patterns discussed here. Use performance-at-scale for spatial indexing, structural-physics for stability systems, multiplayer-building for networking, terrain-integration for foundation systems, decay-upkeep for maintenance systems, and builder-ux for user experience patterns.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.