openspec-new-change
Skill4 starsChanged 12 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Start a new OpenSpec change using the experimental artifact workflow. Use when the user wants to create a new feature, fix, or modification with a structured step-by-step approach. Also use when the user says "openspec new change" or "opsx new".
66 other projects use a version of this, 62 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ValorVie/custom-skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- FuDesign2008/open-skillsedited, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- theoden8/webspace_appedited, first seen Nov 2, 2026
- boozallen/strands-base-agentedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- elastic/terraform-provider-ecedited, first seen Oct 26, 2026
- redhat-developer/rhdh-skillsedited, first seen Oct 23, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use openspec-onboard, draft-openspec-docs and 5 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MicrosoftSkillopenspec-onboard
Guided onboarding for OpenSpec - walk through a complete workflow cycle with narration and real codebase work.
Also in 52 projects that use this
goernSkilldraft-openspec-docs
Collaborative page-drafting mode for the OpenSpec docs. Builds a scratch plan inside the target page (purpose, structure, numbered draft steps), iterates on it with the user, then drafts one section per approved step and cleans up after itself. Use when a page needs a from-scratch rewrite or a new page is being shaped with the user in the loop.
Also in 3 projects that use this
goernSkillrelease-openspec
Use this skill when releasing OpenSpec: audit merged work and changeset coverage, decide whether a catch-up changeset PR is needed, prepare or resume the Changesets Version Packages PR, cut a beta or stable release, verify publishing, and polish GitHub release notes. Also use when asked whether an open release PR is complete, what the next release step is, or to continue a release paused for human approval.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkillopenspec-update-change
Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.
Also in 11 projects that use this
VercelSkillvercel-react-best-practices
React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +2 more from goern
Other versions66 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 62
- Fission-AI/OpenSpec★ 74k100% same
- alibaba/druid★ 28k86% same
- PBH-BTN/PeerBanHelper★ 6.4k83% same
- fengshao1227/ccg-workflow★ 6k86% same
- Soju06/codex-lb★ 3.3k87% same
- Draculabo/AntigravityManager★ 2.5k86% same
- microsoft/rayfin★ 64682% same
- mckinsey/agents-at-scale-ark★ 43886% same
- jerrywu001/cc-sessions-viewer★ 41586% same
- atilladeniz/Kubeli★ 38787% same
52 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 4
- studyzy/imewlconverter★ 10ksame name
- studyzy/OpenSpec-cn★ 1.3ksame name
- charliehzm/medharness★ 85same name
- minghaoZhangZ/shipkit★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository57 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- openspec-apply-changeSkill
- openspec-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-bulk-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-continue-changeSkill
- openspec-exploreSkill
- openspec-ff-changeSkill
- openspec-new-changeSkill
- openspec-sync-specsSkill
- openspec-verify-changeSkill
- openspec-apply-changeSkill
- openspec-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-bulk-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-continue-changeSkill
- openspec-exploreSkill
- openspec-ff-changeSkill
- openspec-new-changeSkill
- openspec-sync-specsSkill
- openspec-verify-changeSkill
- openspec-apply-changeSkill
- openspec-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-bulk-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-continue-changeSkill
- openspec-exploreSkill
- openspec-ff-changeSkill
- openspec-new-changeSkill
- openspec-sync-specsSkill
- openspec-verify-changeSkill
- openspec-apply-changeSkill
- openspec-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-bulk-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-continue-changeSkill
- openspec-exploreSkill
- openspec-ff-changeSkill
- openspec-sync-specsSkill
- openspec-verify-changeSkill
- business-consultantSkill
- cfoSkill
- environment-setupSkill
- find-skillsSkill
- legalSkill
- linkedin-contentSkill
- prdSkill
- prepare-goalSkill
- prepare-openspec-goalSkill
- process-mappingSkill
- research-add-fieldsSkill
- research-add-itemsSkill
- research-deepSkill
- research-reportSkill
- researchSkill
- review-fixSkill
- review-loopSkill
- slidesSkill
- tax-advisorSkill
- vibe-codingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. 8 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
8
Common
Most of the 62 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 13
Start a new change using the experimental artifact-driven approach.
- Distinctive: line 34
Ask the user (open-ended, no preset options):
- Common: line 39
IMPORTANT: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.
- Very specific: line 43
Use the default schema (omit --schema) unless the user explicitly requests a different workflow.
- Very specific: line 55
Add --schema <name> only if the user requested a specific workflow.
- Very specific: line 62
Use the returned planningHome, changeRoot, artifactPaths, and nextSteps instead of assuming repo-local paths.
- Common: line 66
Check the status output to find the first artifact with status "ready".
- Common: line 76
After completing the steps, summarize:
- Common: line 84
Do NOT create any artifacts yet - just show the instructions
- Common: line 85
Do NOT advance beyond showing the first artifact template
- Common: line 86
If the name is invalid (not kebab-case), ask for a valid name
- Common: line 87
If a change with that name already exists, suggest continuing that change instead
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 62 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Start a new change using the experimental artifact-driven approach.
Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context, schemas, view). Once selected, treat --store <id> as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>", not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.
Project check: These steps expect a project that already uses OpenSpec. Before the first step that writes anything (new change, archive, sync specs, or authoring an artifact file), confirm the project has a root: run openspec list --json (with --store <id> when a store is selected, since the store is then the root) and read root. A root object means the project is set up. "root": null means it is not - there is no openspec/ directory here, and a write such as openspec new change would create one as a side effect. The command also exits non-zero, which is that answer rather than a broken CLI, so read the JSON instead of retrying or working around it.
One "root": null is not about setup: when a status error message starts with Declared in or Invalid store declaration in and names this project's openspec/config.yaml (or config.yml), the project does use OpenSpec through a store it declares, which this machine cannot resolve (the store is not registered, or the store: line is malformed). Do not treat it as uninitialized and skip the branches below: stop before writing and show the user that error's message and fix.
Otherwise, with no root, what happens next depends on how this workflow was reached:
- Auto-selected: you chose this workflow yourself, without the user naming OpenSpec, naming this skill, or running its slash command. Stop using OpenSpec and answer the request normally, as you would with no OpenSpec installed. Do not ask them to set anything up and do not mention OpenSpec setup.
- Explicit OpenSpec request: the user named OpenSpec, named this skill, or ran its slash command. Stop before writing and ask how to proceed: set this project up (
openspec init), target a store they already have (--store <id>), or continue without OpenSpec for this request. Wait for their answer.
In both branches, never create the root as a side effect: do not run openspec init until the user asks for it, do not hand-create openspec/ files, and do not let a command create it.
Input: The user's request should include a change name (kebab-case) OR a description of what they want to build.
Steps
If no clear input provided, ask what they want to build
Ask the user (open-ended, no preset options):
"What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."
From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" →
add-user-auth).IMPORTANT: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.
Determine the workflow schema
Use the default schema (omit
--schema) unless the user explicitly requests a different workflow.Use a different schema only if the user mentions:
- A specific schema name → use
--schema <name> - "show workflows" or "what workflows" → run
openspec schemas --jsonand let them choose
Otherwise: Omit
--schemato use the default.- A specific schema name → use
- Create the change directory
Addopenspec new change "<name>"--schema <name>only if the user requested a specific workflow. This creates a scaffolded change in the planning home resolved by the CLI. - Show the artifact status
Use the returnedopenspec status --change "<name>" --jsonplanningHome,changeRoot,artifactPaths, andnextStepsinstead of assuming repo-local paths. - Get instructions for the first artifact
The first artifact depends on the schema (e.g.,
proposalfor spec-driven). Check the status output to find the first artifact with status "ready".
This outputs the template and context for creating the first artifact.openspec instructions <first-artifact-id> --change "<name>" - STOP and wait for user direction
Output
After completing the steps, summarize:
- Change name and location
- Schema/workflow being used and its artifact sequence
- Current status (0/N artifacts complete)
- The template for the first artifact
- Prompt: "Ready to create the first artifact? Just describe what this change is about and I'll draft it, or ask me to continue."
Guardrails
- Do NOT create any artifacts yet - just show the instructions
- Do NOT advance beyond showing the first artifact template
- If the name is invalid (not kebab-case), ask for a valid name
- If a change with that name already exists, suggest continuing that change instead
- Pass --schema if using a non-default workflow
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

