openspec-continue-change
Skill4 starsChanged 12 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Continue working on an OpenSpec change by creating the next artifact. Use when the user wants to progress their change, create the next artifact, or continue their workflow. Also use when the user says "openspec continue" or "opsx continue".
65 other projects use a version of this, 61 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ValorVie/custom-skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- FuDesign2008/open-skillsedited, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- theoden8/webspace_appedited, first seen Nov 2, 2026
- boozallen/strands-base-agentedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- elastic/terraform-provider-ecedited, first seen Oct 26, 2026
- redhat-developer/rhdh-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 23, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use openspec-onboard, draft-openspec-docs and 6 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MicrosoftSkillopenspec-onboard
Guided onboarding for OpenSpec - walk through a complete workflow cycle with narration and real codebase work.
Also in 52 projects that use this
goernSkilldraft-openspec-docs
Collaborative page-drafting mode for the OpenSpec docs. Builds a scratch plan inside the target page (purpose, structure, numbered draft steps), iterates on it with the user, then drafts one section per approved step and cleans up after itself. Use when a page needs a from-scratch rewrite or a new page is being shaped with the user in the loop.
Also in 3 projects that use this
goernSkillrelease-openspec
Use this skill when releasing OpenSpec: audit merged work and changeset coverage, decide whether a catch-up changeset PR is needed, prepare or resume the Changesets Version Packages PR, cut a beta or stable release, verify publishing, and polish GitHub release notes. Also use when asked whether an open release PR is complete, what the next release step is, or to continue a release paused for human approval.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkillopenspec-update-change
Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.
Also in 11 projects that use this
VercelSkillvercel-react-best-practices
React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillrelease
Use ONLY when the user explicitly asks to cut/publish a Huabu desktop release or tag a version. Performs an outward action — bumps the version in apps/desktop/package.json, commits + annotated-tags vX.Y.Z, and pushes the branch + tag. That tag push auto-builds the macOS/Windows installers and publishes a GitHub Release. Provides `status`, `bump`, `tag-push`, and a one-command `run` (bump → tag-push).
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +2 more from goern
Other versions65 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 61
- Fission-AI/OpenSpec★ 74k99% same
- alibaba/druid★ 28k65% same
- PBH-BTN/PeerBanHelper★ 6.4k62% same
- fengshao1227/ccg-workflow★ 6k65% same
- Soju06/codex-lb★ 3.3k65% same
- Draculabo/AntigravityManager★ 2.5k65% same
- microsoft/rayfin★ 64663% same
- mckinsey/agents-at-scale-ark★ 43865% same
- atilladeniz/Kubeli★ 38765% same
- kalbasit/ncps★ 34765% same
51 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 4
- studyzy/imewlconverter★ 10ksame name
- studyzy/OpenSpec-cn★ 1.3ksame name
- charliehzm/medharness★ 85same name
- redhat-developer/rhdh-skills★ 20same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository57 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- openspec-apply-changeSkill
- openspec-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-bulk-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-continue-changeSkill
- openspec-exploreSkill
- openspec-ff-changeSkill
- openspec-new-changeSkill
- openspec-sync-specsSkill
- openspec-verify-changeSkill
- openspec-apply-changeSkill
- openspec-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-bulk-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-continue-changeSkill
- openspec-exploreSkill
- openspec-ff-changeSkill
- openspec-new-changeSkill
- openspec-sync-specsSkill
- openspec-verify-changeSkill
- openspec-apply-changeSkill
- openspec-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-bulk-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-continue-changeSkill
- openspec-exploreSkill
- openspec-ff-changeSkill
- openspec-new-changeSkill
- openspec-sync-specsSkill
- openspec-verify-changeSkill
- openspec-apply-changeSkill
- openspec-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-bulk-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-exploreSkill
- openspec-ff-changeSkill
- openspec-new-changeSkill
- openspec-sync-specsSkill
- openspec-verify-changeSkill
- business-consultantSkill
- cfoSkill
- environment-setupSkill
- find-skillsSkill
- legalSkill
- linkedin-contentSkill
- prdSkill
- prepare-goalSkill
- prepare-openspec-goalSkill
- process-mappingSkill
- research-add-fieldsSkill
- research-add-itemsSkill
- research-deepSkill
- research-reportSkill
- researchSkill
- review-fixSkill
- review-loopSkill
- slidesSkill
- tax-advisorSkill
- vibe-codingSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
18 rules. 7 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
7
Common
Most of the 63 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 34
If a name is provided, use it.
- Very specific: line 37
If ambiguous, run openspec list --json to get available changes sorted by most recently modified, and ask the user to select one
- Distinctive: line 39
When prompting, present the top 3-4 most recently modified changes as options, showing:
- Very specific: line 46
Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., /opsx-continue <other>).
- Distinctive: line 92
Read any completed dependency files for context - always re-read them from disk, even if you saw them earlier in the conversation (the user …
- Very specific: line 94
If the instruction field delegates creation to a specific skill or command, invoke it only if it can write the artifact to that output path.
- Very specific: line 96
Use template as the structure - fill in its sections
- Distinctive: line 98
Write the file to that output path
- Common: line 101
STOP after creating ONE artifact
- Common: line 116
After each invocation, show:
- Very specific: line 127
If the instruction field directs you to use a specific skill or command to create the artifact, invoke it instead of writing the artifact …
- Common: line 130
Create ONE artifact per invocation
- Distinctive: line 131
Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one - re-read from disk, not from conversation memory (files may have changed since …
- Common: line 132
Never skip artifacts or create out of order
- Common: line 133
If context is unclear, ask the user before creating
- Common: line 134
Verify the artifact file exists after writing before marking progress
- Common: line 135
Use the schema's artifact sequence, don't assume specific artifact names
- Very specific: line 137
Do NOT copy <context>, <rules>, <project_context> blocks into the artifact
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 63 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Continue working on a change by creating the next artifact.
Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context, schemas, view). Once selected, treat --store <id> as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>", not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.
Project check: These steps expect a project that already uses OpenSpec. Before the first step that writes anything (new change, archive, sync specs, or authoring an artifact file), confirm the project has a root: run openspec list --json (with --store <id> when a store is selected, since the store is then the root) and read root. A root object means the project is set up. "root": null means it is not - there is no openspec/ directory here, and a write such as openspec new change would create one as a side effect. The command also exits non-zero, which is that answer rather than a broken CLI, so read the JSON instead of retrying or working around it.
One "root": null is not about setup: when a status error message starts with Declared in or Invalid store declaration in and names this project's openspec/config.yaml (or config.yml), the project does use OpenSpec through a store it declares, which this machine cannot resolve (the store is not registered, or the store: line is malformed). Do not treat it as uninitialized and skip the branches below: stop before writing and show the user that error's message and fix.
Otherwise, with no root, what happens next depends on how this workflow was reached:
- Auto-selected: you chose this workflow yourself, without the user naming OpenSpec, naming this skill, or running its slash command. Stop using OpenSpec and answer the request normally, as you would with no OpenSpec installed. Do not ask them to set anything up and do not mention OpenSpec setup.
- Explicit OpenSpec request: the user named OpenSpec, named this skill, or ran its slash command. Stop before writing and ask how to proceed: set this project up (
openspec init), target a store they already have (--store <id>), or continue without OpenSpec for this request. Wait for their answer.
In both branches, never create the root as a side effect: do not run openspec init until the user asks for it, do not hand-create openspec/ files, and do not let a command create it.
Input: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
Steps
Select the change
If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
- Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
- Auto-select if only one active change exists
- If ambiguous, run
openspec list --jsonto get available changes sorted by most recently modified, and ask the user to select one
When prompting, present the top 3-4 most recently modified changes as options, showing:
- Change name
- Status (e.g., "0/5 tasks", "complete", "no tasks")
- How recently it was modified (from
lastModifiedfield)
Mark the most recently modified change as "(Recommended)" since it's likely what the user wants to continue.
Always announce: "Using change:
<name>" and how to override (e.g.,/opsx-continue <other>).- Check current status
Parse the JSON to understand current state. The response includes:openspec status --change "<name>" --jsonschemaName: The workflow schema being used (e.g., "spec-driven")artifacts: Array of artifacts with their status ("done", "skipped", "ready", "blocked")isPlanningComplete: Boolean indicating if all planning artifacts are complete. Older CLI versions expose the same value asisComplete.planningHome,changeRoot,artifactPaths, andactionContext: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.
Act based on status:
Before anything else, finish a partly written artifact:
- An artifact whose output is a glob pattern (e.g.
specs/**/*.md) readsdoneas soon as one matching file exists, so a run interrupted while writing its files leaves itdonewith some still missing - For each such
doneartifact, first get its instructions and read any completed dependencies needed to determine the expected files. Then compare those files withartifactPaths.<id>.existingOutputPaths. For spec-driven'sspecs, read the proposal and check for onespecs/<capability-path>/spec.mdper capability it lists; resolve each expected path againstchangeRootbefore comparing path identity, and verify each one remains insidechangeRootafter resolving symlinks, both in its parent directories and in the file itself if it already exists - Never write an expected path that fails that check; stop and tell the user. If any are missing, write only the missing files, each at its checked path - when the
instructionfield delegates creation to a skill or command, invoke it only if it can write each file to its checked path; otherwise stop and tell the user - and STOP - that counts as this invocation's ONE artifact. If you cannot tell whether a file was left out on purpose, ask the user
If all planning artifacts are complete (
isPlanningComplete: true, or legacyisComplete: true):- Congratulate the user
- Show final status including the schema used
- Suggest: "Planning is complete! You can now implement this change. Once implementation and any tracked work are complete, archive it."
- STOP
If artifacts are ready to create (status shows artifacts with
status: "ready"):- Pick the FIRST artifact with
status: "ready"from the status output - Get its instructions:
openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json - Parse the JSON. The key fields are:
context: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)rules: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)template: The structure to use for your output fileinstruction: Schema-specific guidanceresolvedOutputPath: Resolved path or pattern to write the artifactdependencies: Completed artifacts to read for context (entries withskipped: truehave no files - do not look for them)skipped/warning: present when the change declares skip_specs and this artifact must NOT be created - pick another artifact
- Create the artifact file:
- Read any completed dependency files for context - always re-read them from disk, even if you saw them earlier in the conversation (the user may have edited them)
- Choose the output path before creating anything. If the
resolvedOutputPathspecified in instructions is a glob pattern, choose a concrete path insidechangeRootusing the schema instruction and the change's context, and verify it remains insidechangeRootafter resolving symlinks, both in its parent directories and in the file itself if it already exists; if it does not, stop and tell the user. Otherwise the output path isresolvedOutputPath - If the
instructionfield delegates creation to a specific skill or command, invoke it only if it can write the artifact to that output path; otherwise stop and tell the user - Otherwise, write it yourself:
- Use
templateas the structure - fill in its sections - Apply
contextandrulesas constraints when writing - but do NOT copy them into the file - Write the file to that output path
- Use
- Either way, verify the artifact file exists at that output path
- Show what was created and what's now unlocked
- STOP after creating ONE artifact
If no artifacts are ready (all blocked):
- This shouldn't happen with a valid schema
- Show status and suggest checking for issues
- An artifact whose output is a glob pattern (e.g.
- After creating an artifact, show progress
openspec status --change "<name>"
Output
After each invocation, show:
- Which artifact was created
- Schema workflow being used
- Current progress (N/M complete)
- What artifacts are now unlocked
- Prompt: "Want to continue? Just ask me to continue or tell me what to do next."
Artifact Creation Guidelines
The artifact types and their purpose depend on the schema. The instruction field from the instructions output is the authoritative guidance for each artifact - follow it even when the artifact has a familiar name (proposal.md, tasks.md, etc.), since custom schemas may define different content or a different process for the same file names.
If the instruction field directs you to use a specific skill or command to create the artifact, invoke it instead of writing the artifact directly - but only once you have chosen and checked the output path, and only if it can write there.
Guardrails
- Create ONE artifact per invocation
- Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one - re-read from disk, not from conversation memory (files may have changed since you last saw them)
- Never skip artifacts or create out of order
- If context is unclear, ask the user before creating
- Verify the artifact file exists after writing before marking progress
- Use the schema's artifact sequence, don't assume specific artifact names
- IMPORTANT:
contextandrulesare constraints for YOU, not content for the file- Do NOT copy
<context>,<rules>,<project_context>blocks into the artifact - These guide what you write, but should never appear in the output
- Do NOT copy
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

