agentleFS
200iqlabs200iqlabs/shared-skills/.github/skills/openspec-ff-change/SKILL.md

openspec-ff-change

Skill4 starsChanged 12 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Fast-forward through OpenSpec artifact creation. Use when the user wants to quickly create all artifacts needed for implementation without stepping through each one individually. Also use when the user says "openspec ff" or "opsx ff".

61 other projects use a version of this, 58 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use draft-openspec-docs, release-openspec and 7 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • goernSkill

    draft-openspec-docs

    Collaborative page-drafting mode for the OpenSpec docs. Builds a scratch plan inside the target page (purpose, structure, numbered draft steps), iterates on it with the user, then drafts one section per approved step and cleans up after itself. Use when a page needs a from-scratch rewrite or a new page is being shaped with the user in the loop.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • goernSkill

    release-openspec

    Use this skill when releasing OpenSpec: audit merged work and changeset coverage, decide whether a catch-up changeset PR is needed, prepare or resume the Changesets Version Packages PR, cut a beta or stable release, verify publishing, and polish GitHub release notes. Also use when asked whether an open release PR is complete, what the next release step is, or to continue a release paused for human approval.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • Microsoft AzureSkill

    openspec-update-change

    Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.

    Also in 12 projects that use this

  • SentrySkill

    openspec-propose

    Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.

    Also in 24 projects that use this

  • SentrySkill

    code-simplifier

    Simplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. Use when asked to "simplify code", "clean up code", "refactor for clarity", "improve readability", or review recently modified code for elegance. Focuses on project-specific best practices.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • OpenAISkill

    executing-plans

    Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +2 more from goern

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

22 rules. 6 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 9 are very specific to this project.

  • 6

    Common

    Most of the 59 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 7

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 9

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Ask the user (open-ended, no preset options):

    line 34
  2. Common:

    IMPORTANT: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.

    line 39
  3. Distinctive:

    Use a todo list to track progress through the artifacts.

    line 58
  4. Distinctive:

    Read any completed dependency files for context - always re-read them from disk, even if you saw them earlier in the conversation (the user …

    line 75
  5. Very specific:

    Inspect the relevant project before drafting: Read context and rules first, then inspect relevant implementation, nearby tests, …

    line 76
  6. Distinctive:

    Do this discovery now, rather than leaving generic "explore the codebase" or "make a plan" tasks for implementation.

    line 79
  7. Very specific:

    If the instruction field delegates creation to a specific skill or command, invoke it only if it can write the artifact to that output path.

    line 81
  8. Very specific:

    After creating each artifact, re-run openspec status --change "<name>" --json

    line 87
  9. Distinctive:

    Create every artifact in the required set that is missing, then re-check - creating one can unblock others

    line 91
  10. Very specific:

    Stop when every artifact in the required set is done, skipped, or was deliberately skipped

    line 94
  11. Distinctive:

    Ask the user to clarify

    line 97
  12. Common:

    After completing all artifacts, summarize:

    line 107
  13. Very specific:

    Follow the instruction field from openspec instructions for each artifact type - it is the authoritative guidance, even for familiar …

    line 115
  14. Very specific:

    If the instruction field directs you to use a specific skill or command to create the artifact, invoke it instead of writing the artifact …

    line 116
  15. Common:

    Read dependency artifacts for context before creating new ones

    line 118
  16. Very specific:

    Use template as the structure for your output file - fill in its sections

    line 119
  17. Very specific:

    Do NOT copy <context>, <rules>, <project_context> blocks into the artifact

    line 121
  18. Very specific:

    Create every artifact the apply phase transitively depends on, not just the ids listed in apply.requires

    line 125
  19. Distinctive:

    Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one - re-read from disk, not from conversation memory (files may have changed since …

    line 126
  20. Common:

    If context is critically unclear, ask the user - but prefer making reasonable decisions to keep momentum

    line 127
  21. Common:

    If a change with that name already exists, suggest continuing that change instead

    line 128
  22. Common:

    Verify each artifact file exists after writing before proceeding to next

    line 129

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 59 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Fast-forward through artifact creation - generate everything needed to start implementation in one go.

Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context, schemas, view). Once selected, treat --store <id> as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>", not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.

Project check: These steps expect a project that already uses OpenSpec. Before the first step that writes anything (new change, archive, sync specs, or authoring an artifact file), confirm the project has a root: run openspec list --json (with --store <id> when a store is selected, since the store is then the root) and read root. A root object means the project is set up. "root": null means it is not - there is no openspec/ directory here, and a write such as openspec new change would create one as a side effect. The command also exits non-zero, which is that answer rather than a broken CLI, so read the JSON instead of retrying or working around it.

One "root": null is not about setup: when a status error message starts with Declared in or Invalid store declaration in and names this project's openspec/config.yaml (or config.yml), the project does use OpenSpec through a store it declares, which this machine cannot resolve (the store is not registered, or the store: line is malformed). Do not treat it as uninitialized and skip the branches below: stop before writing and show the user that error's message and fix.

Otherwise, with no root, what happens next depends on how this workflow was reached:

  • Auto-selected: you chose this workflow yourself, without the user naming OpenSpec, naming this skill, or running its slash command. Stop using OpenSpec and answer the request normally, as you would with no OpenSpec installed. Do not ask them to set anything up and do not mention OpenSpec setup.
  • Explicit OpenSpec request: the user named OpenSpec, named this skill, or ran its slash command. Stop before writing and ask how to proceed: set this project up (openspec init), target a store they already have (--store <id>), or continue without OpenSpec for this request. Wait for their answer.

In both branches, never create the root as a side effect: do not run openspec init until the user asks for it, do not hand-create openspec/ files, and do not let a command create it.

Input: The user's request should include a change name (kebab-case) OR a description of what they want to build.

Steps

  1. If no clear input provided, ask what they want to build

    Ask the user (open-ended, no preset options):

    "What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."

    From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" → add-user-auth).

    IMPORTANT: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.

  2. Create the change directory
    openspec new change "<name>"
    This creates a scaffolded change in the planning home resolved by the CLI.
  3. Get the artifact build order
    openspec status --change "<name>" --json
    Parse the JSON to get:
    • applyRequires: array of artifact IDs needed before implementation (e.g., ["tasks"])
    • artifacts: list of all artifacts, each with its status and its requires edges (the artifact IDs it directly depends on)
    • planningHome, changeRoot, artifactPaths, and actionContext: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.
  4. Create every artifact in the required set

    Use a todo list to track progress through the artifacts.

    Loop through artifacts in dependency order (artifacts with no pending dependencies first):

    a. For each artifact that is ready (dependencies satisfied):

    • Get instructions:
      openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json
    • The instructions JSON includes:
      • context: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
      • rules: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
      • template: The structure to use for your output file
      • instruction: Schema-specific guidance for this artifact type
      • skipped/warning: present when the change declares skip_specs and this artifact must NOT be created - stop and pick another artifact
      • resolvedOutputPath: Resolved path or pattern to write the artifact
      • dependencies: Completed artifacts to read for context
    • Read any completed dependency files for context - always re-read them from disk, even if you saw them earlier in the conversation (the user may have edited them)
    • Inspect the relevant project before drafting: Read context and rules first, then inspect relevant implementation, nearby tests, configuration, and documentation outside openspec/. Keep inspection read-only and proportional to the change; reuse findings for later artifacts and inspect more only as needed.
      • Identify the target project from the request and project context; the planning home may be separate from the code. If the target is unclear, ask. For greenfield or non-code changes, inspect the available structure and relevant documents. If source is unavailable, state the limitation and ask when it materially affects the plan.
      • Ground scope, approach, and tasks in what you find. Distinguish observed behavior from assumptions and proposed additions; surface conflicts with existing specs instead of silently deciding which is correct.
      • Do this discovery now, rather than leaving generic "explore the codebase" or "make a plan" tasks for implementation. Keep any necessary follow-up investigation specific to an unresolved question.
    • Choose the output path before creating anything. If resolvedOutputPath is a glob, follow instruction to choose a concrete path inside changeRoot that matches the glob, and verify it remains inside changeRoot after resolving symlinks, both in its parent directories and in the file itself if it already exists; if it does not, stop and tell the user. Otherwise the output path is resolvedOutputPath
    • If the instruction field delegates creation to a specific skill or command, invoke it only if it can write the artifact to that output path; otherwise stop and tell the user. Then verify the artifact file exists at that output path
    • Otherwise create the artifact file using template as the structure and write it to that output path
    • Apply context and rules as constraints - but do NOT copy them into the file
    • Show brief progress: "✓ Created <artifact-id>"

    b. Continue until every artifact in the required set exists (not just apply.requires)

    • After creating each artifact, re-run openspec status --change "<name>" --json
    • The required set is applyRequires plus every artifact reachable from those by following the requires edges in status --json - walk them transitively (spec-driven closes over proposal, specs, design, tasks). Leave artifacts outside that set alone
    • status is file-existence only, so an applyRequires artifact reading done does NOT mean its dependencies exist - writing tasks.md early marks tasks done while specs was never written. Use each artifact's requires edges, not its status, to build the required set: a done artifact still lists what it depends on
    • An artifact already reading status: "skipped" is satisfied: the change declares skip_specs in .openspec.yaml, so its files must NOT exist. Never try to create one
    • Create every artifact in the required set that is missing, then re-check - creating one can unblock others
    • Skip one only when status already reports it skipped, or when its own instruction says it is conditional: run openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json and skip only if its instruction field marks it optional (e.g. "create only if..."). Spec-driven's design.md qualifies; specs qualifies only via the skipped status above, never by your own judgment. Tell the user, and do not reconsider it
    • Dependencies are enablers, not gates: if a required artifact is still blocked only because you skipped a conditional dependency, write it anyway
    • Stop when every artifact in the required set is done, skipped, or was deliberately skipped

    c. If an artifact requires user input (critically unclear context):

    • Ask the user to clarify
    • Then continue with creation
  5. Show final status
    openspec status --change "<name>"

Output

After completing all artifacts, summarize:

  • Change name and location
  • List of artifacts created with brief descriptions, plus any conditional artifact you skipped and why
  • What's ready: "All artifacts needed for implementation are ready."
  • Prompt: "Run /opsx-apply or ask me to implement to start working on the tasks."

Artifact Creation Guidelines

  • Follow the instruction field from openspec instructions for each artifact type - it is the authoritative guidance, even for familiar artifact names
  • If the instruction field directs you to use a specific skill or command to create the artifact, invoke it instead of writing the artifact directly - but only once you have chosen and checked the output path, and only if it can write there
  • The schema defines what each artifact should contain - follow it
  • Read dependency artifacts for context before creating new ones
  • Use template as the structure for your output file - fill in its sections
  • IMPORTANT: context and rules are constraints for YOU, not content for the file
    • Do NOT copy <context>, <rules>, <project_context> blocks into the artifact
    • These guide what you write, but should never appear in the output

Guardrails

  • Create every artifact the apply phase transitively depends on, not just the ids listed in apply.requires
  • Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one - re-read from disk, not from conversation memory (files may have changed since you last saw them)
  • If context is critically unclear, ask the user - but prefer making reasonable decisions to keep momentum
  • If a change with that name already exists, suggest continuing that change instead
  • Verify each artifact file exists after writing before proceeding to next

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.