teleological-interpretation
Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
目的解释技能。当法律条文经过文义解释后仍无法得出确定结论时，通过系统性地发现并论证该条文的目的，在文本可承受范围内选择最正当的含义，形成可裁判的解释结论。触发条件（满足任一即可）：文义解释存在两种以上可能无法择一；文义解释结论明显不合理；条文含开放性评价概念（如"合理""正当""必要""重大"）；条文较旧、面对新型事实时文义覆盖不足。
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- THUYRan/Legal-Skills-Chineseword for word, first seen May 23, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- THUYRan/Legal-Skills-Chinese★ 867100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository88 other files it gives its agents.
- administrative-value-judgmentSkill
- algorithmic-artSkill
- analogical-reasoningSkill
- argument-chain-constructionSkill
- argument-strength-evaluationSkill
- billing-and-litigation-budgetSkill
- brand-guidelinesSkill
- canvas-designSkill
- case-lifecycle-planningSkill
- case-retrievalSkill
- claude-apiSkill
- vercel-composition-patternsSkill
- conflict-resolutionSkill
- counterfactual-reasoningSkill
- deductive-reasoningSkill
- deploy-to-vercelSkill
- dispute-and-performance-riskSkill
- dispute-issue-identificationSkill
- doc-coauthoringSkill
- docxSkill
- evidence-argument-chainSkill
- evidence-evaluationSkill
- formal-legal-consequenceSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- get-api-docsSkill
- guizang-ppt-skillSkill
- guizang-social-card-skillSkill
- inductive-reasoningSkill
- internal-commsSkill
- internal-compliance-risk-identificationSkill
- judgment-document-generationSkill
- judicial-value-judgmentSkill
- legal-abductive-reasoningSkill
- legal-analyzeSkill
- legal-article-retrievalSkill
- legal-case-reviewSkill
- legal-concept-comprehensionSkill
- legal-document-formattingSkill
- legal-document-summarizationSkill
- legal-element-extractionSkill
- legal-interpretation-argumentSkill
- legal-judgment-predictionSkill
- legal-norm-validity-checkSkill
- legal-rememberSkill
- legal-issue-researchSkill
- legal-risk-assessmentSkill
- legal-searchSkill
- legal-terminologySkill
- legal-writeSkill
- ljg-cardSkill
- ljg-investSkill
- ljg-learnSkill
- ljg-paper-flowSkill
- ljg-paper-riverSkill
- ljg-paperSkill
- ljg-plainSkill
- ljg-rankSkill
- ljg-readSkill
- ljg-relationshipSkill
- ljg-roundtableSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.