judicial-value-judgment
Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
辅助法官在权利冲突、法律不确定、比例原则审查和裁量说理场景中，进行结构化、可审查、可论证的司法价值判断。 本 Skill 用于辅助法官在疑难案件中识别法律价值冲突、确定裁量边界、展开价值衡量，并形成可用于裁判说理的分析框架，不替代法官作出最终裁判，而是帮助法官将价值判断转化为有事实基础、规范基础和论证结构的司法推理过程。
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- THUYRan/Legal-Skills-Chineseword for word, first seen May 23, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- THUYRan/Legal-Skills-Chinese★ 867100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository88 other files it gives its agents.
- administrative-value-judgmentSkill
- algorithmic-artSkill
- analogical-reasoningSkill
- argument-chain-constructionSkill
- argument-strength-evaluationSkill
- billing-and-litigation-budgetSkill
- brand-guidelinesSkill
- canvas-designSkill
- case-lifecycle-planningSkill
- case-retrievalSkill
- claude-apiSkill
- vercel-composition-patternsSkill
- conflict-resolutionSkill
- counterfactual-reasoningSkill
- deductive-reasoningSkill
- deploy-to-vercelSkill
- dispute-and-performance-riskSkill
- dispute-issue-identificationSkill
- doc-coauthoringSkill
- docxSkill
- evidence-argument-chainSkill
- evidence-evaluationSkill
- formal-legal-consequenceSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- get-api-docsSkill
- guizang-ppt-skillSkill
- guizang-social-card-skillSkill
- inductive-reasoningSkill
- internal-commsSkill
- internal-compliance-risk-identificationSkill
- judgment-document-generationSkill
- legal-abductive-reasoningSkill
- legal-analyzeSkill
- legal-article-retrievalSkill
- legal-case-reviewSkill
- legal-concept-comprehensionSkill
- legal-document-formattingSkill
- legal-document-summarizationSkill
- legal-element-extractionSkill
- legal-interpretation-argumentSkill
- legal-judgment-predictionSkill
- legal-norm-validity-checkSkill
- legal-rememberSkill
- legal-issue-researchSkill
- legal-risk-assessmentSkill
- legal-searchSkill
- legal-terminologySkill
- legal-writeSkill
- ljg-cardSkill
- ljg-investSkill
- ljg-learnSkill
- ljg-paper-flowSkill
- ljg-paper-riverSkill
- ljg-paperSkill
- ljg-plainSkill
- ljg-rankSkill
- ljg-readSkill
- ljg-relationshipSkill
- ljg-roundtableSkill
- ljg-skill-mapSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.