legal-abductive-reasoning
Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
法律溯因推理（Abductive Reasoning）技能，用于在证据不完整、事实模糊时生成并评估最合理的解释性假设。结合米尔五法（求同、求异、求同求异、剩余、共变）进行结构化因果推断。当用户需要"提出可能的法律解释"、"生成辩护/起诉假设"、"评估证据的多种解读"或"基于不完整事实推断最佳解释"时触发。适用于案例分析、证据评估、规则适用争议、因果关系推断等场景。
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- THUYRan/Legal-Skills-Chineseword for word, first seen May 23, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- THUYRan/Legal-Skills-Chinese★ 867100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository88 other files it gives its agents.
- administrative-value-judgmentSkill
- algorithmic-artSkill
- analogical-reasoningSkill
- argument-chain-constructionSkill
- argument-strength-evaluationSkill
- billing-and-litigation-budgetSkill
- brand-guidelinesSkill
- canvas-designSkill
- case-lifecycle-planningSkill
- case-retrievalSkill
- claude-apiSkill
- vercel-composition-patternsSkill
- conflict-resolutionSkill
- counterfactual-reasoningSkill
- deductive-reasoningSkill
- deploy-to-vercelSkill
- dispute-and-performance-riskSkill
- dispute-issue-identificationSkill
- doc-coauthoringSkill
- docxSkill
- evidence-argument-chainSkill
- evidence-evaluationSkill
- formal-legal-consequenceSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- get-api-docsSkill
- guizang-ppt-skillSkill
- guizang-social-card-skillSkill
- inductive-reasoningSkill
- internal-commsSkill
- internal-compliance-risk-identificationSkill
- judgment-document-generationSkill
- judicial-value-judgmentSkill
- legal-analyzeSkill
- legal-article-retrievalSkill
- legal-case-reviewSkill
- legal-concept-comprehensionSkill
- legal-document-formattingSkill
- legal-document-summarizationSkill
- legal-element-extractionSkill
- legal-interpretation-argumentSkill
- legal-judgment-predictionSkill
- legal-norm-validity-checkSkill
- legal-rememberSkill
- legal-issue-researchSkill
- legal-risk-assessmentSkill
- legal-searchSkill
- legal-terminologySkill
- legal-writeSkill
- ljg-cardSkill
- ljg-investSkill
- ljg-learnSkill
- ljg-paper-flowSkill
- ljg-paper-riverSkill
- ljg-paperSkill
- ljg-plainSkill
- ljg-rankSkill
- ljg-readSkill
- ljg-relationshipSkill
- ljg-roundtableSkill
- ljg-skill-mapSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.