argument-strength-evaluation
Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
当AI智能体完成一段法律推理或论证后，需要对该推理结论进行自我评估，判断论证的整体强度与置信度，识别并标注推理链条中的薄弱环节。 触发条件包括但不限于： - 完成法律分析后需要给出结论可靠性评级 - 用户明确要求评估某一论证的说服力或可靠性 - 存在多个竞争性法律解释需要比较论证强度 - 推理过程中涉及不确定因素（事实不明、法律空白、争议观点）需要标注 - 为决策者提供风险提示，说明结论的局限性 - 对己方或对方的法律论证进行攻防强度评估 - 在法律意见书、备忘录等文书中需要附加置信度说明
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- THUYRan/Legal-Skills-Chineseword for word, first seen May 23, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- THUYRan/Legal-Skills-Chinese★ 867100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository88 other files it gives its agents.
- administrative-value-judgmentSkill
- algorithmic-artSkill
- analogical-reasoningSkill
- argument-chain-constructionSkill
- billing-and-litigation-budgetSkill
- brand-guidelinesSkill
- canvas-designSkill
- case-lifecycle-planningSkill
- case-retrievalSkill
- claude-apiSkill
- vercel-composition-patternsSkill
- conflict-resolutionSkill
- counterfactual-reasoningSkill
- deductive-reasoningSkill
- deploy-to-vercelSkill
- dispute-and-performance-riskSkill
- dispute-issue-identificationSkill
- doc-coauthoringSkill
- docxSkill
- evidence-argument-chainSkill
- evidence-evaluationSkill
- formal-legal-consequenceSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- get-api-docsSkill
- guizang-ppt-skillSkill
- guizang-social-card-skillSkill
- inductive-reasoningSkill
- internal-commsSkill
- internal-compliance-risk-identificationSkill
- judgment-document-generationSkill
- judicial-value-judgmentSkill
- legal-abductive-reasoningSkill
- legal-analyzeSkill
- legal-article-retrievalSkill
- legal-case-reviewSkill
- legal-concept-comprehensionSkill
- legal-document-formattingSkill
- legal-document-summarizationSkill
- legal-element-extractionSkill
- legal-interpretation-argumentSkill
- legal-judgment-predictionSkill
- legal-norm-validity-checkSkill
- legal-rememberSkill
- legal-issue-researchSkill
- legal-risk-assessmentSkill
- legal-searchSkill
- legal-terminologySkill
- legal-writeSkill
- ljg-cardSkill
- ljg-investSkill
- ljg-learnSkill
- ljg-paper-flowSkill
- ljg-paper-riverSkill
- ljg-paperSkill
- ljg-plainSkill
- ljg-rankSkill
- ljg-readSkill
- ljg-relationshipSkill
- ljg-roundtableSkill
- ljg-skill-mapSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.