systematic-interpretation
Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
体系解释是指针对法律规范文义解释后所产生的含义或适用范围上的争议，根据法律规范在法律体系中的位置（如在哪一部法律、编、章或节），关联的法律规范的含义，或者法律作为一个体系的应由之意，做出最符合体系性的解释，从而明确体系视角下法律规范的含义与适用范围。 触发条件（满足任一即可调用）：
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- THUYRan/Legal-Skills-Chineseword for word, first seen May 23, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- THUYRan/Legal-Skills-Chinese★ 867100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository88 other files it gives its agents.
- administrative-value-judgmentSkill
- algorithmic-artSkill
- analogical-reasoningSkill
- argument-chain-constructionSkill
- argument-strength-evaluationSkill
- billing-and-litigation-budgetSkill
- brand-guidelinesSkill
- canvas-designSkill
- case-lifecycle-planningSkill
- case-retrievalSkill
- claude-apiSkill
- vercel-composition-patternsSkill
- conflict-resolutionSkill
- counterfactual-reasoningSkill
- deductive-reasoningSkill
- deploy-to-vercelSkill
- dispute-and-performance-riskSkill
- dispute-issue-identificationSkill
- doc-coauthoringSkill
- docxSkill
- evidence-argument-chainSkill
- evidence-evaluationSkill
- formal-legal-consequenceSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- get-api-docsSkill
- guizang-ppt-skillSkill
- guizang-social-card-skillSkill
- inductive-reasoningSkill
- internal-commsSkill
- internal-compliance-risk-identificationSkill
- judgment-document-generationSkill
- judicial-value-judgmentSkill
- legal-abductive-reasoningSkill
- legal-analyzeSkill
- legal-article-retrievalSkill
- legal-case-reviewSkill
- legal-concept-comprehensionSkill
- legal-document-formattingSkill
- legal-document-summarizationSkill
- legal-element-extractionSkill
- legal-interpretation-argumentSkill
- legal-judgment-predictionSkill
- legal-norm-validity-checkSkill
- legal-rememberSkill
- legal-issue-researchSkill
- legal-risk-assessmentSkill
- legal-searchSkill
- legal-terminologySkill
- legal-writeSkill
- ljg-cardSkill
- ljg-investSkill
- ljg-learnSkill
- ljg-paper-flowSkill
- ljg-paper-riverSkill
- ljg-paperSkill
- ljg-plainSkill
- ljg-rankSkill
- ljg-readSkill
- ljg-relationshipSkill
- ljg-roundtableSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.