Full Ranking

Purpose: Produce a complete priority ranking of all candidate alternatives, supporting PROMETHEE I/II, ELECTRE III, MAVT, and other ranking methods.

When to use:

• User needs a complete ranking of all alternatives (league table)
• Need to distinguish partial order from total order relationships
• Large number of candidates requiring systematic ordering

Budget

State Ledger

strategy: full-ranking
status: pending
criteria_defined: false
weights_computed: false
scores_computed: false
ranking_produced: false
methods_compared: false
result: null

Available Tactics

• scoring-matrix-construction — Build scoring foundation
• multi-method-triangulation — Multi-method comparison to ensure ranking robustness

Available SOPs

Import (from tactics)

• criterion-definition
• weight-elicitation-sop
• alternative-scoring
• normalization
• rank-comparison

Subagent

• scoring-synthesis

Execution Guidance

1. Invoke scoring-matrix-construction to build the score matrix
2. Select >=2 ranking methods (recommended: PROMETHEE II + MAVT)
3. Invoke multi-method-triangulation to compare ranking consistency
4. Pay attention to incomparable pairs in partial orders (specific to ELECTRE III)
5. Synthesize and produce the final ranking

Output Format

## Complete Ranking Results

**Method:** [PROMETHEE II / ELECTRE III / MAVT]

### Ranking Table
| Rank | Alternative | Net Flow/Utility Value | Notes |
|------|-------------|------------------------|-------|

### Method Consistency
| Method Pair | Kendall tau | Divergent Alternatives |
|-------------|-------------|------------------------|

### Robustness Notes
[Sensitivity of ranking to weight changes]