category-sorting
Skill2 starsChanged 6 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Classify candidates into predefined categories using ELECTRE-Tri, FlowSort, AHPSort, or DRSA methods.
In this repository119 other files it gives its agents.
- adaptive-pair-selectionSkill
- adversarial-debate-protocolSkill
- advocate-constructionSkill
- aggregation-methodSkill
- alternative-scoringSkill
- appropriateness-boundingSkill
- argument-crystallizationSkill
- argument-extractionSkill
- assumption-challengeSkill
- assumption-excavationSkill
- assumption-extractionSkill
- ballot-collectionSkill
- best-option-selectionSkill
- bottleneck-identificationSkill
- cluster-analysisSkill
- coherence-diagnosisSkill
- collective-adjudicationSkill
- comparative-feasibility-rankingSkill
- comparison-executorSkill
- conclusion-sensitivitySkill
- conjunctive-filterSkill
- consensus-classificationSkill
- consensus-measurementSkill
- consensus-synthesisSkill
- consistency-audit-loopSkill
- constraint-classificationSkill
- constraint-drillingSkill
- constraint-identificationSkill
- constraint-identification-sopSkill
- convergence-checkSkill
- convergence-distillationSkill
- counter-thesis-constructionSkill
- coverage-scoringSkill
- criteria-interrogationSkill
- criterion-definitionSkill
- critic-attackSkill
- cycle-detectionSkill
- deliberative-calibrationSkill
- dimension-assessmentSkill
- disagreement-cartographySkill
- disagreement-mappingSkill
- disagreement-visualizationSkill
- diversity-maximizationSkill
- dominance-checkSkill
- dynamic-trackingSkill
- efficient-explorationSkill
- feasibility-assessmentSkill
- feasibility-synthesisSkill
- feedback-distributionSkill
- full-rankingSkill
- futures-calibrationSkill
- gate-criteria-definitionSkill
- gate-judgmentSkill
- inconsistency-localizationSkill
- iterative-convergence-roundSkill
- judge-verdictSkill
- judgment-collectionSkill
- maturation-pathway-designSkill
- maturity-diagnosisSkill
- method-sensitivity-reportSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Files
Category Sorting
Purpose: Classify candidate alternatives into predefined categories (e.g., A/B/C grades, compliant/non-compliant), supporting ELECTRE-Tri, FlowSort, AHPSort, DRSA, and other classification methods.
When to use:
- User needs to classify alternatives rather than rank them
- Predefined category boundaries exist (e.g., pass/fail, excellent/good/poor)
- Need to independently determine category membership for each alternative
Budget
| Base SOP | Target | ±10% Range |
| criterion-definition | 5-8 criteria | 4-9 |
| weight-elicitation-sop | 1 weight vector | 1 |
| threshold-setting | 1 threshold set | 1 |
| alternative-scoring | 1 score matrix | 1 |
| scoring-synthesis | 1 classification | 1 |
State Ledger
strategy: category-sorting
status: pending
categories_defined: false
criteria_defined: false
weights_computed: false
thresholds_set: false
scores_computed: false
classified: false
result: nullAvailable Tactics
- scoring-matrix-construction — Build scoring foundation
- screening-then-scoring — Hybrid workflow: screen first, then classify
Available SOPs
Import (from tactics)
- criterion-definition
- weight-elicitation-sop
- alternative-scoring
- threshold-setting
Subagent
- scoring-synthesis
Execution Guidance
- Define category definitions and boundary conditions
- Invoke criterion-definition to determine classification criteria
- Invoke threshold-setting to set category boundaries
- Score each alternative independently and determine category membership
- Handle borderline cases (pessimistic vs optimistic assignment)
Output Format
## Classification Results
**Method:** [ELECTRE-Tri / FlowSort / AHPSort / DRSA]
**Category Definitions:** [A=Excellent, B=Good, C=Needs Improvement, D=Unqualified]
### Classification Table
| Alternative | Category | Confidence | Boundary Distance |
|-------------|----------|------------|-------------------|
### Borderline Cases
[List alternatives near category boundaries and their sensitivity]Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

