agentleFS
Sign inStart free
yogsoth-aiyogsoth-ai/convergence/skills/convergence-distillation/SKILL.md

convergence-distillation

Skill2 starsChanged 6 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Iterative convergence to a single answer through Classic Delphi, Modified Delphi, or Nominal Group Technique rounds.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Run iterative-convergence-round until round-decision returns "stop"

    line 51
  2. Distinctive:

    If max rounds reached without consensus, document dissent

    line 52
  3. Distinctive:

    Run consensus-synthesis to produce final report

    line 53

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Convergence Distillation

Purpose: Drive multiple independent perspectives toward a single shared answer through iterative anonymous feedback rounds. Each round narrows the distribution of judgments until consensus threshold is met or stability is reached.

When to use:

  • Need a single definitive answer from diverse experts
  • Establishing guidelines, thresholds, or standards
  • Quantitative estimates requiring group calibration
  • Situations where social pressure would bias face-to-face discussion

Budget

ParameterConstraint
Rounds2–4 (stop at consensus or stability)
Perspectives≥4 independent
Consensus threshold≥70% agreement or IQR ≤ 1

State Ledger

KeyTypeDescription
questionstringThe focal question being converged
perspectivesarrayList of perspective descriptions
roundsarrayHistory of all round results
current_roundintegerCurrent round number
consensus_scorefloatLatest consensus measurement
stabilitybooleanWhether scores stopped changing

Available Tactics

  • iterative-convergence-round — Core loop: collect → feedback → revise → measure → decide

Available SOPs

  • judgment-collection
  • feedback-distribution
  • consensus-measurement
  • round-decision
  • consensus-synthesis

Execution Guidance

  1. Frame the question clearly with response format (Likert, numeric, ranking)
  2. Run iterative-convergence-round until round-decision returns "stop"
  3. If max rounds reached without consensus, document dissent
  4. Run consensus-synthesis to produce final report

Output Format

consensus_reached: true/false
final_answer: <aggregated result>
consensus_score: <float>
rounds_completed: <int>
dissent_record: <items that did not converge>

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free