agentleFS
yeaight7yeaight7/agent-powerups/skills/log-driven-diagnosis/SKILL.md

log-driven-diagnosis

Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Use when debugging complex runtime failures, distributed systems, or issues where a local debugger cannot be attached.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    When you cannot step through code, logs are your only visibility.

    line 8
  2. Very specific:

    Time-bound the search: Never dump the whole log file — always grep for timestamps around the reported incident, or use tail:

    line 23
  3. Distinctive:

    Identify the request ID: If the system uses distributed tracing or request IDs, find the ID associated with the error, then search the log …

    line 31
  4. Distinctive:

    Add missing logs: If the logs do not provide enough visibility, your first action must be to *add temporary logging* to the application, …

    line 46

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Purpose

When you cannot step through code, logs are your only visibility. Be methodical about extracting signal from noise — never dump whole log files into context.

When to Use

  • Runtime failures where a debugger cannot be attached
  • Distributed systems where the failure spans services
  • Issues reproducible only from log evidence

Inputs

  • Log files or a log explorer covering the incident window
  • The incident timestamp and, if available, a request/trace ID

Workflow

  1. Time-bound the search. Never dump the whole log file — always grep for timestamps around the reported incident, or use tail:

    tail -n 200 app.log                          # most recent context
    grep -n "2026-06-06T14:0" app.log            # window around the incident
    awk '/14:02:00/,/14:05:00/' app.log          # bounded slice between timestamps
  2. Identify the request ID. If the system uses distributed tracing or request IDs, find the ID associated with the error, then search the log corpus for only that ID to trace the complete lifecycle of the failed request:

    grep -n "ERROR" app.log | head -5            # find the failing entry and its ID
    grep -n "<request-id>" app.log               # full lifecycle of that request
    # structured (JSON) logs:
    jq -c 'select(.request_id == "<request-id>")' app.log.json
  3. Look for preceding warnings. The ERROR log is usually just the final crash. The actual root cause is often a WARNING or unexpected INFO log that occurred milliseconds earlier (e.g., a connection retry failing, or an empty array being returned):

    grep -n -B 20 "<error-text>" app.log | grep -inE "warn|retry|timeout|empty"
  4. Add missing logs. If the logs do not provide enough visibility, your first action must be to add temporary logging to the application, reproduce the bug, and gather the new signals. Do not guess blindly if the logs are insufficient.

Output

  • The traced lifecycle of the failing request
  • The suspected root-cause log line(s), including any preceding warnings
  • Any temporary logging added (flagged for later removal)

Verification

  • Every search was time-bounded or ID-bounded — no full-file dumps in context
  • Full request lifecycle traced when an ID exists
  • Lines preceding the error inspected, not just the error line itself
  • Temporary logging added (and flagged for removal) where visibility was missing

Failure Modes

  • Error-line tunnel vision — reading only the final ERROR while the cause sits in an earlier WARNING.
  • Context flooding — dumping megabytes of log into the conversation instead of bounded slices.
  • Blind guessing — iterating on fixes when the honest move is adding logging and reproducing once more.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.