agentleFS
yeaight7yeaight7/agent-powerups/skills/agent-harness-design/SKILL.md

agent-harness-design

Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Use when designing tool definitions for a new agent or subagent, an agent shows high retry rates, ambiguous tool invocations, or silent failures, or an existing agent harness needs a quality review.

4 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

15 rules. About 0 are common, 12 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈12

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use when designing or improving how an agent invokes tools, handles errors, and decides when to stop.

    line 8
  2. Very specific:

    Use explicit, stable names: read_file, run_tests, apply_patch

    line 21
  3. Very specific:

    No generic names: do_action, execute, handle

    line 22
  4. Distinctive:

    Keep tool inputs narrow:

    line 27
  5. Distinctive:

    Use enums for mode/type values — never free-text strings that require parsing

    line 29
  6. Distinctive:

    Every tool response must include:

    line 44
  7. Very specific:

    Avoid run_bash / shell_exec style catch-all tools unless:

    line 52
  8. Distinctive:

    If you must use a catch-all, add a PreToolUse validation hook for dangerous patterns.

    line 56
  9. Distinctive:

    Every tool must define what happens on failure:

    line 60
  10. Distinctive:

    Do not return partial success with no indication that something failed.

    line 68
  11. Distinctive:

    Never retry indefinitely. Declare a hard ceiling.

    line 82
  12. Distinctive:

    Keep system prompt fixed and minimal — it is loaded on every turn

    line 86
  13. Distinctive:

    Put large reference material (schemas, docs) in skills loaded on demand

    line 87
  14. Distinctive:

    Do not pass growing tool-call history to subagents.

    line 89
  15. Distinctive:

    No explicit stop condition — agent loops indefinitely

    line 110

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Agent Harness Design

Use when designing or improving how an agent invokes tools, handles errors, and decides when to stop.

When to Use

  • Designing tool definitions for a new agent or subagent
  • Observing high retry rates or ambiguous tool invocations
  • Agent is failing silently or completing without verifying outcomes
  • Reviewing an existing agent harness for quality issues

Tool Design Rules

Naming

  • Use explicit, stable names: read_file, run_tests, apply_patch
  • No generic names: do_action, execute, handle
  • One tool per distinct operation; do not overload parameters to compensate

Schema

Keep tool inputs narrow:

  • Required fields only; no optional fields that change behavior
  • Use enums for mode/type values — never free-text strings that require parsing
  • Validate at the boundary; reject malformed input with a clear error, not a fallback
{
  "name": "run_tests",
  "parameters": {
    "path": { "type": "string", "description": "Path to test file or directory" },
    "filter": { "type": "string", "description": "Optional test name filter" }
  }
}

Output Shape

Every tool response must include:

  • status: "success" | "warning" | "error"
  • summary: one-line result (human-readable)
  • next_actions: list of follow-up steps the agent should consider
  • artifacts: file paths or IDs produced (empty list if none)

Catch-All Tools

Avoid run_bash / shell_exec style catch-all tools unless:

  • The task is genuinely open-ended and the toolset cannot be pre-defined
  • You explicitly document the risk and add an allowlist or preflight check

If you must use a catch-all, add a PreToolUse validation hook for dangerous patterns.

Error Path Rules

Every tool must define what happens on failure:

CaseRequired response
Invalid inputReject immediately with status: "error" and exact field name
Transient failureInclude retry_after hint and idempotency note
Non-recoverableState stop: true and describe the manual resolution step

Do not return partial success with no indication that something failed.

Retry and Stop Conditions

Define retry limits in the harness, not inside tool implementations:

max_retries: 2
stop_conditions:
  - tool returns status: "error" with stop: true
  - same tool called with identical inputs twice in a row
  - completion signal received

Never retry indefinitely. Declare a hard ceiling.

Context Budget

  • Keep system prompt fixed and minimal — it is loaded on every turn
  • Put large reference material (schemas, docs) in skills loaded on demand
  • Compact at phase boundaries (after research, after planning, after debugging)
  • Do not pass growing tool-call history to subagents; summarize into a context bundle

Granularity Guide

Risk levelTool granularity
High (deploy, migrate, permissions)Micro — one action, one confirmation
Medium (edit, read, search)Standard — composite is fine
Low (format, report, list)Macro — batch operations acceptable

Benchmarks to Track

  • Completion rate (task finished without escalation)
  • Retries per task
  • Pass@1 rate (completed on first attempt)
  • Cost per successful task

Anti-Patterns

  • Overlapping tool semantics (agent cannot choose between them)
  • Tool returns only on error — no output on success
  • No explicit stop condition — agent loops indefinitely
  • Context overload — every tool call inlines full file contents

Verification

  • Every tool has an explicit, stable name and exactly one distinct operation
  • Schemas use required fields and enums — no free-text mode strings, no behavior-changing optionals
  • Every tool response carries status, summary, next_actions, and artifacts
  • Every tool defines its invalid-input, transient-failure, and non-recoverable paths
  • Retry ceiling and stop conditions are declared in the harness, not inside tools
  • Any catch-all tool is documented with its risk and guarded by an allowlist or preflight check

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.