agentleFS
yeaight7yeaight7/agent-powerups/skills/github-ci-failure-triage/SKILL.md

github-ci-failure-triage

Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Use when a GitHub PR shows failing checks and a clean failure readout is needed before changing any code.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Prefer GitHub-native data (gh or a GitHub connector) over screenshots or copied snippets

    line 25
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not auto-commit, auto-push, or auto-rerun remote writes without approval

    line 28
  3. Distinctive:

    If a check is external (not GitHub Actions), report its URL and keep it out of local log parsing.

    line 48
  4. Distinctive:

    Implement only when the user wants the fix: Keep changes traceable to the failing signal.

    line 61

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Purpose

Produce a clean, GitHub-native readout of failing PR checks before any code is edited. Triage first: summarize the breakage and propose a local fix plan; implement only after approval when the task is framed as triage-first.

When to Use

  • A PR is red and the cause is unknown
  • The user asks why CI is failing before asking for a fix
  • A triage-first readout must precede any code edits

Inputs

  • The PR number or URL (or the current branch to resolve it from)
  • gh CLI authenticated for the repository, or a GitHub connector

Core Rules

  • Resolve the PR first
  • Inspect failing checks before guessing
  • Prefer GitHub-native data (gh or a GitHub connector) over screenshots or copied snippets
  • Summarize the failure before proposing code changes
  • Implement only after approval when the task is framed as triage-first
  • Do not auto-commit, auto-push, or auto-rerun remote writes without approval

Workflow

  1. Resolve the PR:

    gh pr view <number-or-url> --json number,title,headRefName,url
    gh pr view --json number,title,headRefName,url    # from the current branch
  2. Inspect failing checks. List checks, isolate failing GitHub Actions jobs, and pull only the failing logs:

    gh pr checks <number>
    gh run list --branch <head-branch> --limit 10
    gh run view <run-id> --json jobs        # job-level status
    gh run view <run-id> --log-failed       # logs from failing steps only

    If a check is external (not GitHub Actions), report its URL and keep it out of local log parsing.

  3. Summarize the failure:
    • failing job
    • likely root cause
    • relevant log snippet
    • affected files or subsystem
  4. Propose the fix plan:
    • what to change locally
    • what to validate locally first
    • what remains remote-only
  5. Implement only when the user wants the fix. Keep changes traceable to the failing signal; rerun the narrowest meaningful local validation first.

Bundled Helper

  • scripts/inspect_pr_checks.py — use it when you want a structured check summary instead of raw gh output.

Output

  • Failing job(s) with a root-cause hypothesis and the minimal relevant log snippet
  • Affected files or subsystem
  • A local fix plan with validation steps, separated from remote-only actions

Verification

  • PR resolved explicitly (number/URL or current branch)
  • Failure evidence pulled from GitHub-native data, not screenshots or pasted snippets
  • Log excerpt limited to the failing step, not the whole run log
  • Summary written before any code change was proposed
  • No remote writes (commit/push/rerun) performed without approval

Failure Modes

  • Guess-first triage — proposing fixes before reading the failing job's log.
  • Log dumping — pasting entire run logs instead of --log-failed output for the failing step.
  • Unapproved remote writes — rerunning workflows or pushing while the task was triage-first.
  • Parsing external checks locally — non-Actions checks only expose a URL; report it instead.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.