agentleFS
yeaight7yeaight7/agent-powerups/skills/context-docs/SKILL.md

context-docs

Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Use when a subsystem needs persistent context for future agents or engineers -- its boundaries keep being rediscovered the hard way, invariants keep getting violated, or sessions repeatedly ask the same questions about it.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    After a refactor changed how a module communicates with the rest of the app

    line 14

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Purpose

Large centralized documentation files consume too much context window. Decentralized, module-specific context docs provide targeted information exactly when an agent needs it.

When to Use

  • A module's boundaries or invariants keep being rediscovered the hard way
  • Onboarding or agent sessions repeatedly ask the same questions about a subsystem
  • After a refactor changed how a module communicates with the rest of the app

Inputs

  • The subsystem directory and its public interface
  • Existing docs, to avoid duplicating the central README or architecture docs

Workflow

  1. Decide where the context belongs. Module-specific knowledge goes in a context file inside the subsystem directory (e.g., src/auth/CONTEXT.md); repo-wide knowledge belongs in the central README or architecture docs — one home per fact, never both:

    find src -iname "CONTEXT.md" -o -iname "README.md"   # existing context docs
    rg -ln "<module name>" docs/                         # already documented centrally?
  2. Document only the boundaries. How does this module communicate with the rest of the app? What are its critical invariants? Not implementation detail the code already states.
  3. Keep it terse. Bullet points and exact file paths. No transient notes — session state, TODO lists, and progress logs belong in handoff documents, not context docs.
  4. Validate every path the doc references:

    rg -no "src/[A-Za-z0-9_./-]+" src/auth/CONTEXT.md | sort -u   # referenced paths
    test -f src/auth/session.ts && echo OK                        # confirm each exists
  5. Update these files inline when refactoring the module. A context doc that lags the refactor is worse than none.

Output

  • A short, boundary-focused context file inside the subsystem directory
  • Stale or central-doc-duplicating content removed or relocated

Verification

  • Doc lives inside the subsystem it describes
  • Content is boundaries and invariants, not implementation detail or transient notes
  • Every referenced file path verified to exist
  • No duplication of central docs — one home per fact
  • Doc updated in the same change set as the refactor that affected it

Failure Modes

  • Context dumping — pasting session notes or progress logs into a context doc; that is a handoff, not context.
  • Central duplication — the same fact in the central README and the module doc, guaranteed to diverge.
  • Path rot — referenced files moved since the doc was written; validate paths on every touch.
  • Novel-length context — if it doesn't fit on a screen, agents won't load it when they need it.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.