agentleFS
yeaight7yeaight7/agent-powerups/skills/change-impact-check/SKILL.md

change-impact-check

Skill6 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Use before submitting a PR or considering a task done to evaluate the blast radius of your changes -- you touched a public signature, a shared utility, a schema, or added config and need to know what else is affected.

  • Reads credentials

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Before submitting a PR or marking a task complete

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    API surface: If you changed a public method signature, REST endpoint, or database schema, search the entire repository for usages of the …

    line 31
  3. Distinctive:

    Dependency graph: If you updated a core utility (e.g., a date formatter), find every module that imports it and confirm their tests still …

    line 38
  4. Distinctive:

    Configuration: If you added or renamed an environment variable, ensure it is documented in the example env file (e.g.

    line 45
  5. Distinctive:

    Act on the blast radius: If the impact is wide, run the full test suite (not just local unit tests) rather than the narrow subset, and …

    line 47

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Purpose

Code changes rarely exist in isolation. Before declaring success, evaluate the downstream consequences of your work: what depends on what you changed, and whether those dependents still hold.

When to Use

  • Before submitting a PR or marking a task complete
  • You changed a public method signature, REST endpoint, or database schema
  • You modified a shared utility, core helper, or widely-imported module
  • You added or renamed an environment variable or config key

Inputs

  • The diff of your changes (staged or committed)
  • Access to the repository to search for callers and run tests

Workflow

  1. Scope the diff. List what actually changed and which files are touched, so you know where to look for fallout.

    git diff --stat            # files changed + churn size
    git diff --name-only       # bare list to feed into searches
  2. API surface. If you changed a public method signature, REST endpoint, or database schema, search the entire repository for usages of the old signature. Every caller is a potential break.

    git grep -n "oldFunctionName"   # all references, with line numbers
    git grep -nw "endpointPath"     # whole-word match for a route/symbol
  3. Dependency graph. If you updated a core utility (e.g., a date formatter), find every module that imports it and confirm their tests still pass. Inspect the dependency tree if a third-party package version moved.

    git grep -n "from '.*utils/date'"   # or the ecosystem equivalent import pattern
    npm ls some-package                 # or the ecosystem equivalent dependency tree
  4. Configuration. If you added or renamed an environment variable, ensure it is documented in the example env file (e.g. .env.example) or the README, and that defaults exist where code reads it.
  5. Act on the blast radius. If the impact is wide, run the full test suite (not just local unit tests) rather than the narrow subset, and explicitly document the affected areas in your handoff or PR description.

    npm test                            # or the ecosystem equivalent full suite

Output

  • A blast-radius assessment per dimension (API surface, dependency graph, configuration)
  • The list of affected callers/modules and whether their tests pass
  • A note in the PR description or handoff documenting wide-impact areas

Verification

  • Old signatures/endpoints/schemas searched repo-wide for remaining usages
  • Importers of any changed shared utility identified and their tests confirmed passing
  • New or renamed config documented in the example env file or README
  • Full test suite run (not just local units) when blast radius is high
  • Affected areas documented in the PR description or handoff

Failure Modes

  • Narrow test run — running only the local unit tests on a wide change; high blast radius demands the full suite.
  • Missed callers — searching one directory or one spelling; grep the whole repo, including whole-word and import-path variants.
  • Silent config break — adding an env var without documenting it or providing a default, so other environments fail at runtime.
  • Declaring done too early — calling the task complete before checking downstream consequences at all.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.