agentleFS
viknesh20-20viknesh20-20/claude-code-tool-kit/.claude/skills/refactor/SKILL.md

refactor

Skill7 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Analyzes code for smells and structural issues, proposes a safe refactoring plan, and executes it with test verification. Use when code is hard to read, maintain, or extend.

196 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use ascii-diagram, debug-fix and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • SethGammonSkill

    ascii-diagram

    Generate perfectly aligned ASCII diagrams — architecture, flow, sequence, box-and-arrow. Uses a programmatic character-grid approach so alignment is guaranteed by math, not token prediction. Includes post-render verification.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • zebbernSkill

    debug-fix

    Find and fix a bug or issue — from any source (GitHub issue, error message, user report, or observed behavior)

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • parcadeiSkill

    agent-context-isolation

    Agent Context Isolation

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • parcadeiSkill

    agentica-infrastructure

    Reference guide for Agentica multi-agent infrastructure APIs

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +8 more from parcadei

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

11 rules. 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 169 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 11

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read the target code and identify issues from this list:

    line 19
  2. Distinctive:

    Dead Code: Remove unused functions, imports, variables, and commented-out code

    line 28
  3. Distinctive:

    Run them to establish a green baseline

    line 45
  4. Distinctive:

    If no tests exist, flag this as a risk and recommend writing tests first

    line 46
  5. Distinctive:

    After each change, verify:

    line 50
  6. Distinctive:

    No new linting errors

    line 53
  7. Distinctive:

    If a change breaks something, revert it immediately

    line 54
  8. Distinctive:

    Run the full test suite for the affected area

    line 57
  9. Distinctive:

    Verify no regressions via git diff

    line 58
  10. Distinctive:

    Ensure the refactored code is actually simpler/cleaner than before

    line 59
  11. Distinctive:

    If it isn't, consider reverting — refactoring should reduce complexity, not just move it

    line 60

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 169 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Safe Code Refactoring

Context

!git status --short 2>/dev/null !git stash list 2>/dev/null


Refactoring Process

Step 1: Analyze — Identify Code Smells

Read the target code and identify issues from this list:

  • Long Method/Function (>40 lines): Extract smaller, focused functions
  • Deep Nesting (>3 levels): Use early returns, guard clauses, or extract methods
  • Code Duplication: Extract shared logic into reusable functions
  • God Class/Module: Split into focused, single-responsibility modules
  • Feature Envy: Move logic to the class/module that owns the data
  • Primitive Obsession: Replace related primitives with a proper type/struct/class
  • Long Parameter List (>4 params): Use an options/config object or builder pattern
  • Dead Code: Remove unused functions, imports, variables, and commented-out code
  • Magic Numbers/Strings: Extract into named constants
  • Inconsistent Naming: Align with project conventions
  • Missing Abstractions: Introduce interfaces/traits where concrete types are overused
  • Tight Coupling: Introduce dependency injection or interface boundaries

Step 2: Plan — Define the Refactoring Strategy

For each identified issue:

  1. Name the specific refactoring technique (Extract Method, Move Function, Introduce Parameter Object, etc.)
  2. Describe the before and after state
  3. Assess the risk (High/Medium/Low) — does it touch public API? Does it cross module boundaries?
  4. List affected files

Present the plan to the user before executing.

Step 3: Verify — Check for Existing Tests

  • Find all tests that cover the code being refactored
  • Run them to establish a green baseline
  • If no tests exist, flag this as a risk and recommend writing tests first

Step 4: Execute — Apply Changes

  • Make one refactoring change at a time
  • After each change, verify:
    • The code still compiles/parses
    • Existing tests still pass
    • No new linting errors
  • If a change breaks something, revert it immediately

Step 5: Validate — Final Checks

  • Run the full test suite for the affected area
  • Verify no regressions via git diff
  • Ensure the refactored code is actually simpler/cleaner than before
  • If it isn't, consider reverting — refactoring should reduce complexity, not just move it

Rules

  • Never change behavior — refactoring is about structure, not features
  • Never skip tests — if tests don't exist, say so and suggest writing them first
  • Small steps — one technique per commit if possible
  • Respect scope — don't refactor code outside the requested area
  • Keep the diff minimal — don't reformat untouched code

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.