code-coverage
Skill7 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Analyzes test coverage, identifies untested code paths, and generates tests for the most critical uncovered areas. Use to improve test coverage before releases.
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- s3s-project/s3stheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- squall-chua/skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 9, 2026
- ffsshhttiikk/opencode-agents-skillstheir own version, first seen Feb 28, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- s3s-project/s3s★ 315same name
- ffsshhttiikk/opencode-agents-skills★ 2same name
- squall-chua/skills★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository45 other files it gives its agents.
- .claude/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- a11y-auditSkill
- api-designSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- business-blueprintSkill
- business-logic-auditSkill
- changelogSkill
- ci-pipelineSkill
- competitive-analysisSkill
- convert-codeSkill
- create-componentSkill
- db-migrationSkill
- debugSkill
- dependency-auditSkill
- deploy-checklistSkill
- design-flowSkill
- docker-setupSkill
- env-setupSkill
- error-monitorSkill
- estimateSkill
- explain-codeSkill
- fix-issueSkill
- generate-docsSkill
- git-cleanupSkill
- grill-meSkill
- handoffSkill
- legal-pagesSkill
- memory-importSkill
- memorySkill
- microcopySkill
- migrate-frameworkSkill
- onboardSkill
- optimizeSkill
- pr-summarySkill
- refactorSkill
- reference-appSkill
- review-prSkill
- security-scanSkill
- seo-scaffoldSkill
- tddSkill
- web-launch-checkSkill
- wireframeSkill
- write-skillSkill
- write-testsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 30
If coverage tools aren't configured, proceed with static analysis.
- Distinctive: line 35
Search for corresponding test files
- Distinctive: line 77
Don't generate tests just to increase numbers — each test should validate something valuable
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Test Coverage Analysis
Detect Test Setup
!ls package.json jest.config.* vitest.config.* .nycrc* .c8rc* .coveragerc* setup.cfg pyproject.toml tox.ini 2>/dev/null
!cat package.json 2>/dev/null | grep -E "jest|vitest|c8|nyc|istanbul|coverage" | head -5
Process
Step 1: Run Coverage (if configured)
Attempt to run the project's coverage command:
| Ecosystem | Coverage Command |
| npm (Jest) | npx jest --coverage --json 2>/dev/null |
| npm (Vitest) | npx vitest run --coverage 2>/dev/null |
| npm (c8) | npx c8 report --reporter=json 2>/dev/null |
| Python (pytest) | python -m pytest --cov --cov-report=json 2>/dev/null |
| Go | go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./... 2>/dev/null && go tool cover -func=coverage.out |
| Rust | cargo tarpaulin --out json 2>/dev/null |
If coverage tools aren't configured, proceed with static analysis.
Step 2: Static Analysis (if no coverage tool)
For the target file(s):
- Identify all public functions, methods, and classes
- Search for corresponding test files
- For each function, check if there's a test that calls it
- Map which code paths (branches, error handlers) have test coverage
Step 3: Coverage Report
Summary
| Metric | Value |
| Line coverage | XX% |
| Branch coverage | XX% |
| Function coverage | XX% |
| Uncovered files | X |
Uncovered Critical Code
List the most important uncovered code, prioritized by:
- Business logic — core features and workflows
- Error handling — catch blocks, error paths, edge cases
- Security-sensitive — auth, input validation, data access
- Complex logic — functions with high cyclomatic complexity
For each uncovered area:
- File path and line numbers
- What the code does
- Why it's important to test
- Suggested test cases
Step 4: Generate Missing Tests
For the top 5 most critical uncovered areas, generate test code following the project's test patterns (same structure as /write-tests).
Step 5: Coverage Improvement Plan
| Priority | File | Current | Target | Tests Needed |
| 1 | ... | XX% | 80%+ | ... |
| 2 | ... | XX% | 80%+ | ... |
Rules
- Focus on meaningful coverage, not 100% — test behavior, not implementation
- Prioritize business logic and error paths over boilerplate
- Don't generate tests just to increase numbers — each test should validate something valuable
- Respect existing test patterns and conventions
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

