agentleFS
viknesh20-20viknesh20-20/claude-code-tool-kit/.claude/skills/pr-summary/SKILL.md

pr-summary

Skill7 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Generates a well-structured pull request description from the current branch diff. Includes summary, changes list, test plan, and breaking changes. Use before opening a PR.

20 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use benchmark, explain and 3 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • dragonflydbSkill

    benchmark

    Benchmark Dragonfly (and compare against Valkey/Redis) on local or remote cloud instances, then produce a performance + memory report with charts and a raw-data appendix. Use this whenever the user runs /benchmark, or asks to benchmark / load-test / measure throughput, QPS, latency, or memory efficiency of Dragonfly or another Redis-compatible server, to compare Dragonfly vs Valkey or Redis, or to generate a benchmark report. Trigger it even when the user just describes the goal ("see how fast Dragonfly is on this box", "compare memory per key vs Valkey") without saying the word "benchmark".

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • sunnyclinches44Skill

    explain

    Explains code using real-world analogies and ASCII diagrams

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • VercelSkill

    investigate

    Investigate an issue report, or analyze the constraints of a proposed change, with strict, evidence-driven diagnosis.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • AWSSkill

    retro

    Conduct a retrospective on a coding session.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • SentrySkill

    commit

    Create commit messages following Sentry conventions. Use when committing code changes, writing commit messages, or formatting git history. Follows conventional commits with Sentry-specific issue references.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 16 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read every commit message and the full diff.

    line 25
  2. Distinctive:

    Read ALL commits, not just the latest

    line 65
  3. Distinctive:

    Don't embellish — describe what actually changed

    line 66

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 16 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Generate PR Summary

Branch Context

!git branch --show-current 2>/dev/null !git log main..HEAD --oneline 2>/dev/null || git log master..HEAD --oneline 2>/dev/null

Diff Summary

!git diff main...HEAD --stat 2>/dev/null || git diff master...HEAD --stat 2>/dev/null

Full Diff

!git diff main...HEAD 2>/dev/null | head -800 || git diff master...HEAD 2>/dev/null | head -800


Instructions

Step 1: Analyze All Commits

Read every commit message and the full diff. Understand:

  • What feature, fix, or change was implemented
  • Why it was needed (from commit messages and code context)
  • What files were touched and what changed in each

Step 2: Generate PR Description

Use this format:

## Summary
<!-- 1-3 sentences explaining what this PR does and why -->

## Changes
<!-- Bulleted list of specific changes, grouped by area -->

### [Area 1]
- Change description

### [Area 2]
- Change description

## Test Plan
- [ ] Test case 1
- [ ] Test case 2
- [ ] Edge case verification

## Breaking Changes
<!-- List any breaking changes, or "None" -->

## Notes for Reviewers
<!-- Anything reviewers should pay special attention to -->

Step 3: Determine PR Title

  • Format: type: concise description (under 72 chars)
  • Types: feat, fix, refactor, docs, test, chore, perf
  • Example: feat: add user authentication with JWT refresh tokens

Rules

  • Read ALL commits, not just the latest
  • Don't embellish — describe what actually changed
  • Flag any TODOs or known issues honestly
  • Include breaking changes prominently

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.