agentleFS
tykisgodtykisgod/quick-question/skills/self-review/SKILL.md

self-review

Skill12 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Review changes from the most recent interaction (skills, configs, settings, and other lightweight changes) for quality and consistency.

51 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use latex-formatting, novelty-assessment and 9 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • lingzhi227Skill

    latex-formatting

    Handle LaTeX formatting, templates, and styling for academic papers. Set up conference templates (ICML, ICLR, NeurIPS, AAAI, ACL), fix formatting issues, manage packages, and ensure venue-specific compliance. Use when the user needs to set up a paper template, fix LaTeX formatting, or prepare for submission.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • lingzhi227Skill

    novelty-assessment

    Assess research idea novelty through systematic literature search. Multi-round search-evaluate loops with harsh critic persona. Binary novel/not-novel decision with justification. Use before committing to a research direction.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • michaelboedingSkill

    slide-generation

    Use this skill to create presentation slides from structured content. Triggers: "create slides", "generate presentation", "make powerpoint", "create pptx", "build slides", "presentation from content", "slide deck", "slides for" Outputs: PPTX files, Markdown slides, or HTML presentations. Used by: pitch-deck-agent, market-researcher-agent, and other agents needing slides.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • juanlurgSkill

    paper-to-code

    Reads a research paper and generates an implementation notebook with equations, code, and a toy example. Use when the user wants to implement a paper, convert a paper to code, or reproduce a paper's algorithm.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • OpenAISkill

    idea-generation

    Use when triaging public-equity idea candidates. Do not use for final trade recommendations, pitches, memos, or models.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +6 more from lingzhi227

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 42 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Look back at the files changed in the most recent interaction and list them (file paths + one-line summary of each change).

    line 13
  2. Very specific:

    If this round had [Critical] issues fixed → start next round (back to a)

    line 43
  3. Very specific:

    If no [Critical] issues → output "Review passed" and proceed to cleanup

    line 44
  4. Distinctive:

    If 5 rounds completed → output final status and proceed to cleanup

    line 45
  5. Distinctive:

    After the review loop ends, recommend the next step:

    line 57

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 42 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Respond in the user's preferred language (detect from their recent messages, or fall back to the language setting in CLAUDE.md).

Unity runtime or scene changes: check that they behave as intended by querying the live Editor read-only through the project's channel (shared/unity-live-state.md), e.g. unity command --project-path "$PWD" --json --no-banner get_component_properties -- <params> on the official CLI; with no channel, say the runtime behavior is unverified.

Steps

1. Collect changed files

Look back at the files changed in the most recent interaction and list them (file paths + one-line summary of each change).

2. Review Loop

Loop automatically until there are no [Critical] issues in the review, or 5 rounds are completed.

Output === Round N/5 === at the start of each round.

a. Dispatch review subagent

Dispatch a subagent (subagent_type: "general-purpose", model: "opus") with a prompt containing:

  1. The list of changed files and a summary of what was changed
  2. The full current content of each changed file (read them yourself and paste them in)
  3. Review checklist:
    • Logical correctness — are references correct, are step numbers sequential, do file paths exist
    • Consistency — does the style match existing content in this repo
    • Omissions — are there related files that should have been updated but were missed
    • Redundancy — unnecessary blank lines, duplicate content
    • Naming — are renamed symbols/paths consistent everywhere
  4. Required output format: classify each finding as [Critical], [Moderate], or [Suggestion] with file path, line number, and explanation

b. Fix confirmed issues

  • For each [Critical] issue: fix immediately
  • For each [Moderate] issue: fix at discretion
  • [Suggestion] items: note but do not fix unless trivial

c. Determine whether to continue

  • If this round had [Critical] issues fixed → start next round (back to a)
  • If no [Critical] issues → output "Review passed" and proceed to cleanup
  • If 5 rounds completed → output final status and proceed to cleanup

3. Clean up

Output a brief review conclusion, then clear the skill change marker:

source "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/platform/detect.sh"
if qq_session_id; then rm -f "$QQ_TEMP_DIR/claude-skill-modified-marker-$QQ_SESSION_ID"; fi

Handoff

After the review loop ends, recommend the next step:

  • Review passed, no issues → "All clean. Ready to /qq:commit-push?"
  • Issues were found and fixed → "Fixed N issues across M rounds. Want to /qq:commit-push?"
  • 5 rounds exhausted with remaining issues → "Some issues remain after 5 rounds. Please review manually before committing."

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.