changes
Skill12 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Summarize all changes Claude Code made during this conversation.
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- UltralayerHQ/ultralayer-plugintheir own version, first seen Nov 5, 2026
- rubixkube-io/rubixkube-for-aitheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- JiHong88/suneditortheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- JiHong88/suneditor★ 2ksame name
- UltralayerHQ/ultralayer-plugin★ 3same name
- rubixkube-io/rubixkube-for-ai★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository29 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- add-testsSkill
- best-practiceSkill
- bootstrapSkill
- briefSkill
- claude-code-reviewSkill
- claude-plan-reviewSkill
- codex-code-reviewSkill
- codex-plan-reviewSkill
- commit-pushSkill
- depsSkill
- design-researchSkill
- designSkill
- doc-driftSkill
- doc-syncSkill
- doc-tidySkill
- executeSkill
- explainSkill
- full-briefSkill
- goSkill
- grandmaSkill
- planSkill
- post-design-reviewSkill
- recordSkill
- self-reviewSkill
- tech-researchSkill
- testSkill
- timelineSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 15
After producing the summary, if qq-run-record.py is available, persist a changes run record so controller state can advance:
- Distinctive: line 49
If there are architectural changes (file moves, namespace changes, asmdef changes), call them out separately
- Distinctive: line 51
If there were multiple rounds of changes in the conversation (e.g., did A first, then changed B), group them in chronological order
- Distinctive: line 52
If any changes were rolled back or overwritten, show only the final state, but note "tried X then changed to Y"
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Run qq scripts as
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/<name>: they are not on PATH, so a bareqq-run-record.pyexits 127.
Respond in the user's preferred language (detect from their recent messages, or fall back to the language setting in CLAUDE.md).
Behavior
Identify all file changes actually executed by Claude in this conversation (via Edit/Write/Bash tools) and summarize them grouped by logic.
The data source is the conversation context, not git diff — include every round, committed or not.
After producing the summary, if qq-run-record.py is available, persist a changes run record so controller state can advance:
qq-run-record.py record \
--project . \
--stage changes \
--command qq:changes \
--status checked \
--summary "Conversation change summary captured" \
--capture-local-changesOutput format
## Summary of changes in this conversation
### <Group 1 title>
- What was done
- Key files: ...
### <Group 2 title>
- ...
### Status
- Committed: <list of commit hashes, if any>
- Uncommitted: <list of files, if any>
- Compilation: passed / not verified
- Tests: N/N passed / not runNotes
- List the main file paths for each group (omit the
Assets/Scripts/prefix to save space) - If there are architectural changes (file moves, namespace changes, asmdef changes), call them out separately
.metafiles do not need to be mentioned- If there were multiple rounds of changes in the conversation (e.g., did A first, then changed B), group them in chronological order
- If any changes were rolled back or overwritten, show only the final state, but note "tried X then changed to Y"
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

