agentleFS
tidycatc132tidycatc132/claude-skills/skills/week-5-handoff-check/SKILL.md

week-5-handoff-check

Skill0 starsChanged 37 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Runs the go/no-go final sweep ending a website build's Week 5 and, on GO, writes the all good to go message to dev. A script checks that the dev handoff index ends GO, the newest staging QA is a re-run with no open CRITICAL and every open MAJOR deferred, every QA and client-edit BugHerd task is done or deferred, the Week 5 email's send date has passed, the client's staging edits are classed with a PM/AM note on each Scope Change (or the reply-by date passed with no reply) and the AM signed off, then gives GO or NO-GO with owners. Use when the PM asks for the Week 5 final sweep, the launch go/no-go, whether a site is cleared to deploy, or the go message to dev once nothing blocks launch. Do NOT use for the staging QA or a re-run (use staging-site-qa), sorting the client's edits (use client-feedback), the staging email (use week-5-client-email), the Week 1 or 2 checks (use week-1-handoff-check, week-2-handoff-check), the dev index (use dev-handoff-index), or a technical SEO audit (use technical-seo-checker).

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.