agentleFS
tidycatc132tidycatc132/claude-skills/skills/week-5-client-email/SKILL.md

week-5-client-email

Skill0 starsChanged 36 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Drafts the Week 5 email a WISE Account Manager sends a client with the staging site link for their last review before launch, under 150 words, what to check (facts, names, contact details), how to send edits (reply, or BugHerd for guests), a reply-by date three business days out and, by default, that WISE goes ahead with the site as it is if there is no reply. Use when the AM asks for the Week 5 email, the staging review email, the email sending the staging link, or the final check before launch email. Writes emails/[slug]/[slug]-week-5-email.md, warns above it when the latest staging QA is NOT READY or has open AM items, and a script checks it. Do NOT use for the welcome email (use welcome-email), the Week 1 or 2 emails (use week-1-client-email, week-2-client-email), sorting or answering the client's staging edits (use client-feedback), the staging QA (use staging-site-qa), chasing a silent client, the final sweep before launch (use week-5-handoff-check), or the go-live email (use week-6-go-live-email).

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.