agentleFS
tidycatc132tidycatc132/claude-skills/skills/client-feedback/SKILL.md

client-feedback

Skill0 starsChanged 35 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Sorts a client's reply to a review email into a feedback table and drafts the Account Manager's answer, for Week 1 (homepage copy and designs), Week 2 (Growth Blueprint, deck and page content, or a nudge when no reply comes) and Week 5 (staging edits by email or as the client's BugHerd tasks, classed Mechanical, Strategic or Scope Change, with BugHerd tasks). Use when the client's reply to the homepage, Blueprint or staging email needs triage, sorting, its facts pulling out or an answer, staging edits or BugHerd comments need classing and routing, or the Week 2 email got no reply. Do NOT use for the emails sending the work (use week-1-client-email, week-2-client-email or week-5-client-email), merging facts or access (use client-context-update), the welcome email (use welcome-email), changing the Blueprint (use growth-blueprint) or deck (use blueprint-deck), rewriting copy (use seo-content-writer), staging QA (use staging-site-qa), or the Week 1 or 5 checks (use week-1-handoff-check, week-5-handoff-check).

3 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.