agentleFS
tidycatc132tidycatc132/claude-skills/skills/site-structure-optimizer/SKILL.md

site-structure-optimizer

Skill0 starsChanged 35 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Use when the user asks to "plan my site structure", "plan a sitemap", "which pages should we keep, merge or cut", "design the page hierarchy, navigation or URL taxonomy", "map hub-and-spoke topic clusters", "restructure my site", "fix internal linking", "find orphan pages", "optimize anchor text", or "suggest internal links for this article". Two modes. architecture decides which pages exist (keep/merge/retire scoring) and designs the architecture (hierarchy, URL map, nav, hub/spoke clusters, Mermaid site map). linking optimizes links inside an existing site (link graph, click depth, authority flow, anchors, orphan disposition, link plan). Both output a structure score /100 and a handoff summary from a crawler or inlinks export, sitemap or page list. architecture enforces the SOW page cap and can use Figma. Do NOT use for backlinks or AI referrals (use offsite-signal-analyzer), for XML sitemap, indexation or crawl errors (use technical-seo-checker), or for page content scoring (use content-quality-auditor).

1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.