agentleFS
sunilgentyalasunilgentyala/OmniRed/skills/auth/session-attacks/SKILL.md

session-attacks

Skill5 starsChanged 5 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Session management attack methodology. Covers session fixation, CSRF, cookie theft, session prediction, concurrent session abuse, and logout bypass.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Test: Check if the session token changes after successful login.

    line 19
  2. Distinctive:

    No CSRF token: attack directly

    line 32
  3. Distinctive:

    If token A still works: no concurrent session control

    line 66
  4. Distinctive:

    If request succeeds: session not invalidated on logout

    line 74

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Session Management Attacks

Session Fixation

1. Attacker obtains a pre-auth session token
2. Attacker sends victim a link with the fixed session: https://target.com/login?PHPSESSID=attacker_session
3. Victim logs in — server assigns that session to the authenticated user
4. Attacker uses the same session token to access victim's account

Test: Check if the session token changes after successful login. No change = likely fixation vulnerability.

CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)

<!-- Auto-submitting CSRF form hosted on attacker.com -->
<form id="csrf" action="https://target.com/api/change-email" method="POST">
  <input name="email" value="attacker@attacker.com">
</form>
<script>document.getElementById('csrf').submit();</script>

CSRF bypass techniques:

  • No CSRF token: attack directly
  • CSRF token not tied to session: reuse your own valid token
  • Referrer check bypass: send from target.com subdomain (open redirect) or remove Referer header
  • Token in URL: change to POST and test if GET token accepted
  • SameSite=Lax: CSRF via top-level GET navigation with side effects

Cookie Security Analysis

Secure flag:   Missing → token sent over HTTP → interception risk
HttpOnly flag: Missing → token accessible via XSS → document.cookie
SameSite:      None → CSRF from cross-origin → test CSRF attacks
Domain:        .target.com → token sent to all subdomains → subdomain takeover → session theft
Expiry:        No expiry → session persists indefinitely after logout

Session Prediction

# Test for weak session tokens
import requests, hashlib, time

for i in range(100):
    r = requests.get("https://target.com/login")
    token = r.cookies.get('SESSID')
    # Check if token is time-based, sequential, or MD5/SHA1 of predictable input
    print(hashlib.md5(str(time.time()).encode()).hexdigest())

Concurrent Session Abuse

  1. Log in as user A — note session token A
  2. Log in again as user A — note session token B
  3. Try to use token A after token B is issued
  4. If token A still works: no concurrent session control
  5. Impact: attacker can maintain persistent access even after victim logs out

Forced Logout Testing

  1. Log in; note session token
  2. Log out
  3. Replay the session token in a subsequent request
  4. If request succeeds: session not invalidated on logout

Tools

  • Burp Suite — session analysis, CSRF POC generator
  • CSRF-Tester
  • Browser dev tools — inspect cookie attributes

OWASP Mapping

  • A07:2021 — Identification and Authentication Failures
  • A01:2021 — Broken Access Control (CSRF)

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.