agentleFS
soilmasssoilmass/motion-design-agent/skills/motion-audit/SKILL.md

motion-audit

Skill7 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub

Comprehensive checklist for auditing animations against Disney principles, accessibility standards, performance budgets, and brand consistency. Use when reviewing animation implementations.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Evaluate: - Check against each criteria

    line 14

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Motion Audit Checklist

Systematic review process for ensuring animations meet quality standards across Disney principles, accessibility, performance, and brand.

Audit Process

  1. Identify - List all animated elements
  2. Categorize - Classify by type and importance
  3. Evaluate - Check against each criteria
  4. Document - Record findings and recommendations
  5. Prioritize - Rank issues by severity

Disney Principles Checklist

Core Principles

  • Squash & Stretch - Applied to impacts, volume preserved
  • Anticipation - Wind-up before major actions (15-25%)
  • Staging - One clear focal point per animation
  • Follow-Through - Secondary elements lag behind
  • Slow In/Out - Proper easing (no linear)
  • Arcs - Physical objects move in arcs
  • Secondary Action - Supporting animations at 30-50%
  • Timing - Durations match token scale
  • Exaggeration - Appropriate for brand
  • Appeal - Motion feels polished

Accessibility Checklist

Reduced Motion

  • prefers-reduced-motion is respected
  • Alternative exists (opacity fade, instant)
  • No essential information only in animation

Timing & Seizures

  • No flashing > 3 times/second
  • User can pause/stop animations
  • Duration allows content to be read

Focus & Navigation

  • Focus states are animated appropriately
  • Keyboard navigation is smooth
  • Screen readers announce changes

Performance Checklist

Frame Rate

  • Maintains 60fps on target devices
  • No jank during scroll animations
  • Low-end device testing performed

Paint & Layout

  • Uses transform/opacity only (GPU)
  • No layout thrashing (width, height, top, left)
  • will-change used sparingly

Bundle Size

  • Animation library is code-split
  • Lottie files are optimized
  • No unused animation utilities

Brand Consistency Checklist

Token Usage

  • All durations from token scale
  • All easings from token library
  • No hardcoded magic numbers

Personality

  • Motion matches brand adjectives
  • Consistent across touchpoints
  • Appropriate for audience

Issue Severity Levels

LevelImpactExampleAction
CriticalBlocks usersSeizure-inducing flashImmediate fix
MajorDegrades experience60fps to 15fpsFix before release
MinorSuboptimalLinear easingFix when possible
EnhancementImprovementAdd anticipationConsider for future

Audit Frequency

TriggerScopeDepth
Every PRChanged componentsQuick check
Sprint endNew featuresFull audit
QuarterlyEntire productComprehensive
Major releaseCritical pathsDeep dive

Related Skills

  • motion-principles/ - Disney 12 principles reference
  • accessibility/ - WCAG compliance details
  • testing-patterns/ - Automated testing for audits
  • tools/ - Tool-specific audit considerations

See references/ for audit scoring templates and ESLint/Stylelint rules.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.