security-review
Skill192 starsChanged 40 days agoMITView on GitHub
Security review via Codex exec. Use when: OWASP Top 10:2025 audit, dependency vulnerability check, security-sensitive changes. Not for: code review (use codex-code-review), test review (use test-review). Output: security findings + audit report.
192 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- metacircu1ar/hive_skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- rschuft/ai-frontend-skill-packstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- 81wallace18/codex-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- FimawLLC/fimaw-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- aws/credential-daemontheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- compozy/compozytheir own version, first seen Nov 13, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use linkerd-patterns, dependency-cve-sweep and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
xfstudioSkilllinkerd-patterns
Implement Linkerd service mesh patterns for lightweight, security-focused service mesh deployments. Use when setting up Linkerd, configuring traffic policies, or implementing zero-trust networking with minimal overhead.
Also in 5 projects that use this
berntpoppSkilldependency-cve-sweep
Use when handling Dependabot PRs, CodeQL/Trivy alerts, or doing a routine dependency/CVE sweep for this repo.
Also in 12 projects that use this
berntpoppSkillfleet-standard-adoption
Use when bringing this repo into compliance with a GeneFoundry fleet standard (tool-naming, response-envelope, container-hardening, versioning, MCP transport, or logging) or closing its tracking issue.
Also in 12 projects that use this
HABUBUSSSkillproject-guidelines-example
Also in 16 projects that use this
niloykumarbarmanSkillagent-sort
Build an evidence-backed ECC install plan for a specific repo by sorting skills, commands, rules, hooks, and extras into DAILY vs LIBRARY buckets using parallel repo-aware review passes. Use when ECC should be trimmed to what a project actually needs instead of loading the full bundle.
Also in 13 projects that use this
royaluniondesign-sysSkillconfigure-ecc
Interactive installer for Everything Claude Code — guides users through selecting and installing skills and rules to user-level or project-level directories, verifies paths, and optionally optimizes installed files.
Also in 11 projects that use this
- +2 more from berntpopp
Other versions192 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- sd0xdev/sd0x-harness★ 192100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 191
- affaan-m/ECC★ 246ksame name
- github/awesome-copilot★ 41ksame name
- langfuse/langfuse★ 37ksame name
- nearai/ironclaw★ 13ksame name
- joe-bell/cva★ 6.9ksame name
- doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper★ 5.5ksame name
- github/squad★ 3.4ksame name
- compozy/compozy★ 2.9ksame name
- trycompai/comp★ 2.1ksame name
- xu-xiang/everything-claude-code-zh★ 1.9ksame name
181 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository102 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adrSkill
- agentctl-setupSkill
- architectureSkill
- askSkill
- best-practicesSkill
- bug-fixSkill
- bump-versionSkill
- check-coverageSkill
- claude-healthSkill
- code-exploreSkill
- code-investigateSkill
- codex-architectSkill
- codex-brainstormSkill
- codex-cli-reviewSkill
- codex-code-reviewSkill
- codex-explainSkill
- codex-implementSkill
- codex-review-branchSkill
- codex-review-docSkill
- codex-review-fastSkill
- codex-reviewSkill
- codex-securitySkill
- codex-setupSkill
- codex-test-genSkill
- codex-test-reviewSkill
- contract-decodeSkill
- create-prSkill
- create-requestSkill
- de-ai-flavorSkill
- debugSkill
- deep-analyzeSkill
- deep-exploreSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- dep-auditSkill
- deploy-flowSkill
- dev-security-auditSkill
- doc-refactorSkill
- doc-reviewSkill
- epic-mergeSkill
- feasibility-studySkill
- feature-devSkill
- feature-verifySkill
- fp-briefSkill
- generate-runnerSkill
- gh-stackSkill
- git-investigateSkill
- git-profileSkill
- install-hooksSkill
- install-rulesSkill
- install-scriptsSkill
- issue-analyzeSkill
- jiraSkill
- load-pr-reviewSkill
- merge-prepSkill
- necessity-auditSkill
- next-stepSkill
- obsidian-cliSkill
- op-sessionSkill
- orchestrateSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Files
Security Review Skill
Trigger
- Keywords: security review, OWASP, vulnerability, dep-audit, npm audit, dependency security
When NOT to Use
- General code review (use
codex-code-review) - Functional testing (use
test-review) - Performance issues (not security-related)
Commands
| Command | Purpose | When |
/codex-security | OWASP Top 10 audit | Security-sensitive code |
/dep-audit | Dependency security audit | Periodic / PR |
Workflow: /codex-security
Determine scope → Collect changes → Codex OWASP review → Findings + Gate → Loop if Must fixStep 1: Determine Scope
Parse --scope from arguments, default to src/.
Step 2: Collect Change Metadata
Metadata, not content: the first dispatch carries the changed-file list and diff stats, and Codex
reads the diffs itself from the sandbox (@rules/codex-invocation.md § Required in every first-dispatch prompt). A truncated
| head -1500 excerpt was the old shape, and it decided for the reviewer which 1500 lines of a
security review mattered.
CHANGED_FILES:git diff --name-only HEAD -- <scope>∪git ls-files --others --exclude-standard -- <scope>DIFF_STAT:git diff --stat HEAD -- <scope>SCOPE: the resolved scope argument, plus the security-relevant paths aGlob("**/*{auth,login,password,token,secret,key,credential}*")surfaces — named as places to look, never pasted
Step 3: Codex Security Review
First review: dispatch per @skills/codex-code-review/references/codex-transport.md § Start with the OWASP prompt. See references/codex-prompt-security.md.
Save the returned threadId.
Loop review: dispatch per @skills/codex-code-review/references/codex-transport.md § Resume with the re-review template. See references/codex-prompt-security.md.
Step 4: Consolidate Output
Organize results into findings summary table + detailed findings + gate.
OWASP Top 10:2025
The version is part of the identifier: SSRF is no longer A10 (it sits inside A01), and A02–A06 renumbered, so a finding labelled with a 2021 code says something different to whoever reads it.
| Code | Category | Check Focus |
| A01 | Broken Access Ctrl | IDOR, permission bypass, CORS, SSRF |
| A02 | Misconfiguration | Debug mode, default passwords |
| A03 | Supply Chain Failures | Vulnerable deps, unverified build sources |
| A04 | Crypto Failures | Sensitive data encryption, weak crypto |
| A05 | Injection | SQL/NoSQL/Cmd Injection, XSS |
| A06 | Insecure Design | Rate Limiting, business logic |
| A07 | Auth Failures | Brute force, session, weak passwords |
| A08 | Integrity Failures | Deserialization, CI/CD |
| A09 | Logging & Alerting | Sensitive data in logs, auditing, alerts |
| A10 | Exceptional Conditions | Error paths that fail open or leak |
Review Loop
⚠️ @CLAUDE.md auto-loop: fix → re-review → ... → ✅ PASS ⚠️
⛔ Must fix → fix P0 issues → /codex-security --continue <threadId> → repeat until ✅ Mergeable.
Max 3 rounds. Still failing → report blocker.
Verification
- Each issue tagged with severity (P0/P1/P2)
- Gate is explicit (✅ Mergeable / ⛔ Must fix)
- Fix recommendations are specific and actionable
- Includes verification test method
- Codex independently researched auth/input/sensitive code
References
- OWASP prompt:
references/codex-prompt-security.md - Examples:
references/examples.md - Standards: @rules/security.md
Examples
Input: /codex-security --scope src/controller/
Action: OWASP Top 10 check → output issues + Gate
Input: /dep-audit --level high
Action: npm audit → filter high/critical → output reportDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

