code-explore
Skill192 starsChanged 36 days agoMITView on GitHub
Pure Claude code investigation. Use when: tracing execution paths, understanding architecture, diagnosing issues. Not for: dual-perspective review (use code-investigate), code review (use codex-code-review). Output: analysis report with findings.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- sd0xdev/sd0x-harnessword for word, first seen Oct 6, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- sd0xdev/sd0x-harness★ 192100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository102 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adrSkill
- agentctl-setupSkill
- architectureSkill
- askSkill
- best-practicesSkill
- bug-fixSkill
- bump-versionSkill
- check-coverageSkill
- claude-healthSkill
- code-investigateSkill
- codex-architectSkill
- codex-brainstormSkill
- codex-cli-reviewSkill
- codex-code-reviewSkill
- codex-explainSkill
- codex-implementSkill
- codex-review-branchSkill
- codex-review-docSkill
- codex-review-fastSkill
- codex-reviewSkill
- codex-securitySkill
- codex-setupSkill
- codex-test-genSkill
- codex-test-reviewSkill
- contract-decodeSkill
- create-prSkill
- create-requestSkill
- de-ai-flavorSkill
- debugSkill
- deep-analyzeSkill
- deep-exploreSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- dep-auditSkill
- deploy-flowSkill
- dev-security-auditSkill
- doc-refactorSkill
- doc-reviewSkill
- epic-mergeSkill
- feasibility-studySkill
- feature-devSkill
- feature-verifySkill
- fp-briefSkill
- generate-runnerSkill
- gh-stackSkill
- git-investigateSkill
- git-profileSkill
- install-hooksSkill
- install-rulesSkill
- install-scriptsSkill
- issue-analyzeSkill
- jiraSkill
- load-pr-reviewSkill
- merge-prepSkill
- necessity-auditSkill
- next-stepSkill
- obsidian-cliSkill
- op-sessionSkill
- orchestrateSkill
- plan-reviewSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 19
No dual confirmation needed (no Codex cross-validation)
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Code Explore Skill
Trigger
- Keywords: code explore, code investigation, research code, trace code, feature understanding, quick investigation, code exploration
When to Use
- Quickly understand how a feature works
- Trace execution paths / data flow
- Diagnose problem root causes
- No dual confirmation needed (no Codex cross-validation)
When NOT to Use
| Scenario | Alternative |
| Need dual confirmation | /code-investigate (Claude + Codex) |
| Git history tracking | /git-investigate |
| System verification | /feature-verify |
| Code review | /codex-review-fast |
Workflow
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 1: Locate Entry Point │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Grep keywords -> find related files │
│ 2. Identify entry points (Controller / Service / Provider) │
│ 3. Build file list │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 2: Trace Path │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Start from entry point, Read │
│ 2. Identify dependencies -> continue tracing │
│ 3. Map call chain (A -> B -> C) │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 3: Understand Logic │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. What is the core logic? │
│ 2. How does data flow? │
│ 3. Error handling mechanisms? │
│ 4. Key decision points? │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 4: Output Report │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Architecture overview (diagram / table) │
│ 2. Key files list │
│ 3. Execution flow │
│ 4. Findings / notes │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Search Strategy
| Target | Strategy |
| Feature entry | Grep "export class.*Controller" / Grep "@Get|@Post" |
| Service layer | Grep "export class.*Service" |
| Provider layer | Glob "src/provider/**/*.ts" |
| Configuration | Read {CONFIG_FILE} |
| Data models | Glob "src/model/**/*.ts" |
Output Format
## Investigation Report: {Topic}
### Architecture Overview
{ASCII or Mermaid diagram}
### Key Files
| File | Responsibility |
| ----------------- | -------------- |
| `path/to/file.ts` | Description |
### Execution Flow
1. {Step 1}
2. {Step 2}
3. ...
### Data Flow
{Describe how data flows}
### Findings
- {Important finding 1}
- {Important finding 2}
### Notes
- {Potential issue / edge case}Verification
- Entry points identified and listed
- Execution flow traced end-to-end
- Key files table includes all relevant files
- Findings section has actionable insights
References
references/search-patterns.md— Common search patterns for codebase exploration (read when building search strategy)
Examples
Feature Understanding
Input: Investigate how user data queries work
Phase 1: Grep "balance" -> find UserService, UserController
Phase 2: Controller -> Service -> Provider call chain
Phase 3: Understand query + cache mechanism
Phase 4: Output report + flow diagramProblem Diagnosis
Input: Why does this API sometimes return empty?
Phase 1: Grep "getData" + "cache" -> related files
Phase 2: Trace data retrieval path
Phase 3: Identify fallback logic + timeout handling
Phase 4: List possible causes + recommendationsArchitecture Understanding
Input: What is the overall architecture of the user module?
Phase 1: Glob "src/**/*user*" -> list all related files
Phase 2: Identify layer relationships (Controller -> Service -> Provider)
Phase 3: Understand each layer's responsibilities
Phase 4: Output architecture diagram + module descriptionDifference from code-investigate
| Dimension | code-explore | code-investigate |
| Speed | Fast (single view) | Slow (dual view) |
| Confirmation | Single perspective | Cross-validation |
| Tools | Pure Claude | Claude + Codex |
| Use case | Quick investigation | Important decisions |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

