agentleFS
sd0xdevsd0xdev/sd0x-dev-flow/skills/code-explore/SKILL.md

code-explore

Skill192 starsChanged 36 days agoMITView on GitHub

Pure Claude code investigation. Use when: tracing execution paths, understanding architecture, diagnosing issues. Not for: dual-perspective review (use code-investigate), code review (use codex-code-review). Output: analysis report with findings.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    No dual confirmation needed (no Codex cross-validation)

    line 19

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Code Explore Skill

Trigger

  • Keywords: code explore, code investigation, research code, trace code, feature understanding, quick investigation, code exploration

When to Use

  • Quickly understand how a feature works
  • Trace execution paths / data flow
  • Diagnose problem root causes
  • No dual confirmation needed (no Codex cross-validation)

When NOT to Use

ScenarioAlternative
Need dual confirmation/code-investigate (Claude + Codex)
Git history tracking/git-investigate
System verification/feature-verify
Code review/codex-review-fast

Workflow

┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 1: Locate Entry Point                                │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Grep keywords -> find related files                     │
│ 2. Identify entry points (Controller / Service / Provider) │
│ 3. Build file list                                         │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                          ↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 2: Trace Path                                        │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Start from entry point, Read                            │
│ 2. Identify dependencies -> continue tracing               │
│ 3. Map call chain (A -> B -> C)                            │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                          ↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 3: Understand Logic                                  │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. What is the core logic?                                 │
│ 2. How does data flow?                                     │
│ 3. Error handling mechanisms?                              │
│ 4. Key decision points?                                    │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                          ↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 4: Output Report                                     │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Architecture overview (diagram / table)                 │
│ 2. Key files list                                          │
│ 3. Execution flow                                          │
│ 4. Findings / notes                                        │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Search Strategy

TargetStrategy
Feature entryGrep "export class.*Controller" / Grep "@Get|@Post"
Service layerGrep "export class.*Service"
Provider layerGlob "src/provider/**/*.ts"
ConfigurationRead {CONFIG_FILE}
Data modelsGlob "src/model/**/*.ts"

Output Format

## Investigation Report: {Topic}

### Architecture Overview

{ASCII or Mermaid diagram}

### Key Files

| File              | Responsibility |
| ----------------- | -------------- |
| `path/to/file.ts` | Description   |

### Execution Flow

1. {Step 1}
2. {Step 2}
3. ...

### Data Flow

{Describe how data flows}

### Findings

- {Important finding 1}
- {Important finding 2}

### Notes

- {Potential issue / edge case}

Verification

  • Entry points identified and listed
  • Execution flow traced end-to-end
  • Key files table includes all relevant files
  • Findings section has actionable insights

References

  • references/search-patterns.md — Common search patterns for codebase exploration (read when building search strategy)

Examples

Feature Understanding

Input: Investigate how user data queries work
Phase 1: Grep "balance" -> find UserService, UserController
Phase 2: Controller -> Service -> Provider call chain
Phase 3: Understand query + cache mechanism
Phase 4: Output report + flow diagram

Problem Diagnosis

Input: Why does this API sometimes return empty?
Phase 1: Grep "getData" + "cache" -> related files
Phase 2: Trace data retrieval path
Phase 3: Identify fallback logic + timeout handling
Phase 4: List possible causes + recommendations

Architecture Understanding

Input: What is the overall architecture of the user module?
Phase 1: Glob "src/**/*user*" -> list all related files
Phase 2: Identify layer relationships (Controller -> Service -> Provider)
Phase 3: Understand each layer's responsibilities
Phase 4: Output architecture diagram + module description

Difference from code-investigate

Dimensioncode-explorecode-investigate
SpeedFast (single view)Slow (dual view)
ConfirmationSingle perspectiveCross-validation
ToolsPure ClaudeClaude + Codex
Use caseQuick investigationImportant decisions

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.