agentleFS
sd0xdevsd0xdev/sd0x-dev-flow/skills/next-step/SKILL.md

next-step

Skill192 starsChanged 36 days agoMITView on GitHub

Change-aware next step advisor. Use when: user asks what to do next, workflow progression is unclear, session just started with dirty worktree. Not for: executing the suggested command (user decides), auto-loop decisions (hooks handle that). Output: findings-based suggestions or session summary with commit seed.

12 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use interview and brainstorm.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • dazuckSkill

    interview

    Interview me about a plan to flesh out requirements before implementation. Asks non-obvious questions one at a time until all ambiguities are resolved.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • nicolasestremSkill

    brainstorm

    Structured idea generation and solution exploration with systematic analysis.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Run bash scripts/run-skill.sh next-step analyze.js to collect deterministic findings

    line 16
  2. Distinctive:

    If the script fails or is unavailable, fall back to manual signal collection:

    line 48
  3. Very specific:

    When --go is provided, auto-execute the top next_action IF:

    line 61
  4. Distinctive:

    NEVER dispatch on P0. Fall back to advisory mode if confidence < 0.8.

    line 69
  5. Very specific:

    Only skill slash-commands from next_actions are dispatched (via Skill tool).

    line 70
  6. Distinctive:

    When the script detects actionable findings, format the top 3:

    line 79
  7. Distinctive:

    When all gates pass and no actionable findings remain, summarize the session instead of suggesting "commit/push":

    line 95
  8. Very specific:

    When a feature directory exists in docs/features/, cross-check document pairs:

    line 130
  9. Distinctive:

    When the best next step is NOT a slash command:

    line 140

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Next Step Advisor

When NOT to Use

  • Auto-loop already handling review/precommit flow (hooks track and assist)
  • User gave a clear, specific instruction (just do it)
  • Mid-execution of a skill workflow (follow that skill's progression)

Procedure

  1. Run bash scripts/run-skill.sh next-step analyze.js to collect deterministic findings
  2. Parse the JSON output — findings, gates, diff summary, phase, feature_context, next_actions, backlog
  3. If P0/P1 findings exist → format top 3 as actionable suggestions (Findings Mode)
  4. If mid-pipeline (gates not all passed, no P0/P1) → use progression tables to suggest next step
  5. If phase = post_precommit → suggest doc sync + request update (use next_actions)
  6. If phase = feature_complete → output feature complete summary with backlog
  7. If all gates pass and no P0/P1 → output session summary with commit seed (Summary Mode, P2/P3 shown as oversights)

Script Integration

The analyze script runs 18 deterministic heuristics against git state, review state, and feature context:

PriorityHeuristicsMeaning
P0Gate missing (code review, doc review, precommit)Required steps not completed
P1Test gap, security hotspot, migration risk, doc-sync-needed, request-stale, corpus-unreadableImportant oversights
P2README missing, skill-lint needed, locale drift, mixed concerns, ac-incomplete, intent-advisory (planning docs without exact intent-<key>.md)Quality improvements
P3Main branch warning, requirements-advisory, feature-completeInformational

The script exits with code 0 (no P0/P1), 1 (has P1), or 2 (has P0).

Output Fields (v2)

FieldTypeDescription
phasestringmid_development / post_precommit / ready_to_commit / feature_complete / clean
feature_contextobject{ key, source, confidence, docs_path, has_tech_spec, has_requirements, has_requests }
next_actionsarray[{ id, command, args, reason, confidence }] sorted by confidence desc
backlogobject/null{ total_features, incomplete_features } — only when phase = feature_complete

Script Failure Fallback

If the script fails or is unavailable, fall back to manual signal collection:

#SignalHow
1Git branchgit branch --show-current
2Git statusgit status -sb
3Changed filesgit diff --name-only HEAD + git status --porcelain (for untracked)
4Gate statenode scripts/review-state.js check --format=fact(installed copy first: .claude/scripts/review-state.js;checker 不在 → 不主張任何 verdict)

Then use the Progression Tables below.

Dispatch Mode (--go flag)

When --go is provided, auto-execute the top next_action IF:

  • next_actions[0] exists AND confidence >= 0.8
  • No P0 findings
  • Command is not null

Output: "Auto-dispatching: [command] [args]" then invoke the Skill tool and report the result.

Safety constraints:

  • NEVER dispatch on P0. Fall back to advisory mode if confidence < 0.8.
  • Only skill slash-commands from next_actions are dispatched (via Skill tool). No arbitrary shell execution.
  • Arguments are limited to file paths and flags extracted by buildNextActions — no user-supplied strings.

Progression Tables (mid-pipeline fallback)

See references/progression-tables.md for full work-type detection and step-by-step progression tables (Feature Dev, Bug Fix, Docs, Refactoring, Investigation).

Output Format — Findings Mode

When the script detects actionable findings, format the top 3:

📍 [work type] | [branch] | [current phase]

⚠️ Findings ([count]):
1. **[P0/P1/P2] [finding id]** — [message] → [suggestion]
2. **[P0/P1/P2] [finding id]** — [message] → [suggestion]
3. **[P0/P1/P2] [finding id]** — [message] → [suggestion]
[+N more if suppressed]

➡️ Next: [primary action based on highest priority finding]

Output Format — Session Summary (all gates pass, no P0/P1)

When all gates pass and no actionable findings remain, summarize the session instead of suggesting "commit/push":

📍 [work type] | [branch] | all gates passed

✅ Session Summary:
- [what was accomplished, derived from diff summary and conversation]
- [key changes: N files changed, types of changes]

⚠️ Oversights (if any P2/P3 remain):
- [P2/P3 findings as optional improvements]

💬 Commit seed:
  [type]: [concise description of all changes]

The commit seed is a suggestion — the user decides the final message.

Output Format — Feature Complete (phase = feature_complete, backlog exists)

📍 [work type] | [branch] | feature complete

✅ Feature [key] Complete
- All gates passed, no sync issues remaining

📋 Backlog ([N] incomplete):
- [feature-key] — status: [status], unchecked AC: [count]
- ...

➡️ Next: Pick a feature from the backlog or start new work

Document Completeness Check

When a feature directory exists in docs/features/, cross-check document pairs:

StateSuggest
tech-spec exists, no request/create-request
request exists, no tech-spec/tech-spec
Both exist, code changed/update-docs + /create-request --update

Non-Command Suggestions

When the best next step is NOT a slash command:

SignalSuggest
Requirements unclear"Confirm requirements with PM/user before proceeding"
Affects other services"Confirm upstream/downstream API contracts"
Security-sensitive change/codex-security before proceeding
No clear task"Clarify what to do — don't start without clear requirements"
Session just started, dirty worktree"Handle uncommitted changes first"

Verification

  • Script ran successfully (or fallback used)
  • Findings formatted with priority and actionable suggestions
  • Session summary includes commit seed when all clear
  • Non-command suggestions used when appropriate

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

Reviews can't be read right now.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.