agentleFS
sd0xdevsd0xdev/sd0x-dev-flow/skills/merge-prep/SKILL.md

merge-prep

Skill192 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub

Pre-merge analysis and preparation. Analyzes source branch vs target branch: commit stats, conflict detection, file impact. Analysis-only v1 — outputs report + suggested commands, does not auto-merge. Use when: user says 'merge prep', 'pre-merge', 'merge analysis', or /merge-prep

  • Commits and pushes

3 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  • could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
  1. Distinctive:

    Run the analysis script:

    line 64
  2. Distinctive:

    No auto-merge: Only output commands, never execute git merge

    line 182
  3. Distinctive:

    No auto-push: Never execute git push

    line 183
  4. Distinctive:

    No auto-commit: Never execute git commit

    line 184
  5. Distinctive:

    No rebase: Never suggest or execute rebase operations

    line 185

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Merge Prep — Pre-merge Analysis and Preparation

Analyze source branch vs target branch, detect conflicts, output analysis report with suggested commands. v1 is analysis-only — does not execute merge/commit/push.

When NOT to Use

ScenarioUse Instead
Commit code (not merge)/smart-commit
Merge to main (production)Manual PR flow
Just view diffgit diff <target>..<branch>
Rebase or squashManual operation

Input

/merge-prep <source-branch> [--target <branch>]

  • <source-branch>: Branch to merge (required)
  • --target: Target branch (default: {TARGET_BRANCH} or main)

Workflow

sequenceDiagram
    participant C as Claude
    participant U as User
    C->>C: Step 1: Validate prerequisites
    C->>C: Step 2: Pre-merge analysis
    C->>U: Show analysis report
    U->>C: Acknowledge
    C->>C: Step 3: Conflict analysis (if any)
    C->>U: Show conflict details + resolution suggestions
    C->>C: Step 4: Generate merge commands
    C->>U: Output commands for manual execution

Step 1: Validate Prerequisites

# 1a. Verify source branch exists
git rev-parse --verify <branch>

# 1b. Verify target branch exists
git rev-parse --verify <target>

# 1c. Verify working tree is clean
git status --porcelain
CheckFailure Action
Branch doesn't existHalt, list available branches
Target not foundHalt, suggest creating it
Uncommitted changesHalt, suggest /smart-commit first

Step 2: Pre-merge Analysis

Run the analysis script:

bash skills/merge-prep/scripts/pre-merge-check.sh <branch> [target]

Script outputs JSON containing:

  • merge_base: Common ancestor
  • source_commits: New commits on source branch
  • target_commits: Commits on target that source doesn't have
  • has_conflicts: Whether conflicts exist
  • conflict_files: List of conflict files
  • file_stats: Affected file statistics

Display analysis report:

## Pre-merge Analysis

| Item | Value |
|------|-------|
| Source branch | feat/new-feature |
| Target branch | main |
| Common ancestor | b03ad72a |
| New commits | 12 |
| Affected files | 46 |
| Predicted conflicts | 9 files |

### Recent Commits

| Hash | Message |
|------|---------|
| abc1234 | feat: Add new API endpoint |
| def5678 | test: Add integration tests |

Step 3: Conflict Analysis (if conflicts detected)

For each conflict file, analyze commit history to determine conflict pattern:

PatternDetectionSuggested Strategy
Iterative (v1→v3)Both sides changed, source is supersetTake source
Parallel modificationDifferent people changed different logicPer-hunk selection
Hotfix conflictTarget has hotfix merge, source doesn'tTake target
Doc add/addBoth sides added same-name fileTake source

Display resolution suggestions:

### Conflict Files

| # | File | Pattern | Suggestion | Reason |
|---|------|---------|------------|--------|
| 1 | src/xxx.ts | Iterative | Take source | v3 includes all v1 changes |
| 2 | src/yyy.ts | Parallel | Per-hunk | Two sides changed different functions |
| 3 | docs/zzz.md | add/add | Take source | Target version is outdated |

Step 4: Generate Merge Commands

Output commands for manual execution:

## Suggested Merge Commands

### Option A: Merge commit (recommended)

```bash
git checkout <target>
git pull --ff-only origin <target>
git merge <source> --no-ff
# Resolve conflicts if any
# git add <resolved-files>
# git commit
git push origin <target>

Option B: Squash merge

git checkout <target>
git pull --ff-only origin <target>
git merge --squash <source>
git commit -m "merge: Merge <source> into <target>"
git push origin <target>

### Step 5: Summary

```markdown
## Merge Summary

| Item | Value |
|------|-------|
| Source | feat/new-feature |
| Target | main |
| Commits | 12 |
| Files | 46 |
| Conflicts | 9 (resolution suggestions provided) |
| Tickets | PROJ-520, PROJ-123 |

⚠️ This is an analysis-only report. Execute the commands manually.

Multi-branch Mode

Supports /merge-prep branch1 branch2 branch3 --target develop:

  1. Analyze each branch sequentially
  2. Output combined summary
  3. Suggest merge order (fewest conflicts first)

Prohibited (v1)

  • No auto-merge: Only output commands, never execute git merge
  • No auto-push: Never execute git push
  • No auto-commit: Never execute git commit
  • No rebase: Never suggest or execute rebase operations

References

FilePurposeWhen to Read
pre-merge-check.shPre-merge analysis scriptStep 2

Verification

  • Source branch exists and working tree is clean
  • Pre-merge analysis displayed with user acknowledgment
  • Conflicts analyzed with resolution suggestions
  • Merge commands are output-only (not executed)
  • No secrets in output, no force push suggested

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.