codex-review-branch
Skill192 starsChanged 36 days agoMITView on GitHub
Fully automated review of an entire feature branch using Codex exec
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- sd0xdev/sd0x-harnessword for word, first seen Oct 6, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- sd0xdev/sd0x-harness★ 192100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository102 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adrSkill
- agentctl-setupSkill
- architectureSkill
- askSkill
- best-practicesSkill
- bug-fixSkill
- bump-versionSkill
- check-coverageSkill
- claude-healthSkill
- code-exploreSkill
- code-investigateSkill
- codex-architectSkill
- codex-brainstormSkill
- codex-cli-reviewSkill
- codex-code-reviewSkill
- codex-explainSkill
- codex-implementSkill
- codex-review-docSkill
- codex-review-fastSkill
- codex-reviewSkill
- codex-securitySkill
- codex-setupSkill
- codex-test-genSkill
- codex-test-reviewSkill
- contract-decodeSkill
- create-prSkill
- create-requestSkill
- de-ai-flavorSkill
- debugSkill
- deep-analyzeSkill
- deep-exploreSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- dep-auditSkill
- deploy-flowSkill
- dev-security-auditSkill
- doc-refactorSkill
- doc-reviewSkill
- epic-mergeSkill
- feasibility-studySkill
- feature-devSkill
- feature-verifySkill
- fp-briefSkill
- generate-runnerSkill
- gh-stackSkill
- git-investigateSkill
- git-profileSkill
- install-hooksSkill
- install-rulesSkill
- install-scriptsSkill
- issue-analyzeSkill
- jiraSkill
- load-pr-reviewSkill
- merge-prepSkill
- necessity-auditSkill
- next-stepSkill
- obsidian-cliSkill
- op-sessionSkill
- orchestrateSkill
- plan-reviewSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 43
Document review (use /codex-review-doc)
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Codex Review Branch
Thin entry-point skill — routes to the parent skill for full workflow.
Parent Skill
This is the Branch variant of codex-code-review. Full workflow, prompt templates, and review logic are defined in the parent skill.
See @skills/codex-code-review/SKILL.md
Variant
| Property | Value |
| Scope | Full branch (all commits since base) |
| Pre-checks | None |
| Prompt template | @skills/codex-code-review/references/codex-prompt-branch.md |
| Reviewers | Codex alone. --dual adds a secondary reviewer — off unless the flag is passed |
| Tier | thorough (this is the depth variant — P0/P1/P2 block, round cap 30) |
Flags
| Flag | Default | Effect |
--dual | off | Adds a second reviewer in parallel (see parent skill Step 3). The merge happens in conversation — no state write, no mode field, and the next invocation starts single again unless the flag is passed again. A second opinion that can block this review's gate. Use for releases, security-sensitive changes, and public API surfaces. |
--dual is the only code-review entry point where two reviewers run. /codex-review-fast and /codex-review-doc are single-reviewer by design and offer no such flag: the cost of the second opinion is only worth paying where the change warrants it, and this is that variant. /plan-review --dual is the plan-mode counterpart — same opt-in shape, same default of off, a different loop.
Trigger
- Keywords: branch review, full branch, review branch, codex-review-branch
When NOT to Use
- Quick diff-only review (use
/codex-review-fast) - Full review with lint + build (use
/codex-review) - Document review (use
/codex-review-doc)
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.